aliens & their message

The Sumerians didn't need to write any of the story to understand their place in the universe. Almost nothing has anything to do with an understand of why things are the way they are it only supports and shows ground on the creation of man. The mythology doesn't answer why there's rain, or how the oceans came to be, or how mountains are made. A lot of other mythology does go into that. That the mountains are bones or a great frog was poked by an echidna and bursted and filled the oceans and rivers with water.

That stuff dream time trying to make sense of things but the Sumerians didn't need to do that they seemed to come out of the great flood with a perfect recipe for starting civilisation. They didn't need to make a up story that God made it rain for 40 days and 40 nights, they scientifically instead analised that the ice sheets of the south pole had shifted into the ocean creating a devastating tidal wave hundred of meters high, which in itself is a fabulous story because if we listen to what modern historians have to tell us, they couldn't have possibly known about the south pole, the earth was flat. The Sumerians knew the earth wasn't flat though because there's descriptions about what it looks like from the upper atmosphere when select individual humans were granted permission to reach the heavens... In a space ship.

 

I looked into that. The UFO group is led by a Blink-182 member. (No joke)

 

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

From what I just read the guitarist Tom DeLonge left Blink-182 to study UFOs,

 

Maybe all that sound frequency and resonation contacted UFOs when he practice at home.

 

Disturbing if true.

 

Ohh I wouldn't post any fake news. >.>
All my facts are 100

 

Lol.

 

Now I feel like your posting off topic stuff. Should link these articles.

 

I feel like it's very on topic, after all, my arguments have consistantly been about the false history of our human origins.

 

It's on topic alright. But also merely a picture and a bold claim at this point. I mean, what are 'those handful of recent discoveries'?

You make it sound a bit like its deliberately false, or is that just me? I think you believe the current scientific consensus is false (or are you only playing with that?), but it appears simply the most likely at this point. If the new discoveries appear more plausible than the current consensus, the scientific consensus would change. It's all part of the scientific method

 

I basically don't believe anything I've ever been taught about our ancient ancestors.

Explain how southern Africa has over 500,000 square meters of stone ruins made up of billions and billions of rocks, over 100,000 structures dated to be hundreds of thousands of years old when historians tells us that South Africa was only inhabited by small tribes and in only the last 150 years has been the mass push for migration in the area.

Historians have this obsession with small Hunter gatherer tribes migrating from place to place in groups yet the archaeological evidence speaks volumes.

I don't expect you guys to understand because you won't research them. The oldest working sun dial calander, called Adams Calander and most recently referred to as Enkis Calander (because it was found in the exact location the Sumerians said it would be in Sth Africa) is dated to be 75,000 years old, in a place and continent that we've been taught had no significant civilisations, yet this calander and the all the stone ruins that have been buried under the earth and those above ground do not coincide with this history we've been taught. Therefore, I cannot find it within myself to believe anything I've been taught anymore. It is blatantly false education.

Not the mention the mine shafts that have been dated to be hundreds of thousands of years old either. Something very big was happening in South Africa a very long time ago. I think it's time somebody started to conclude some legitimate answers. The problem is you have to forfeit everything you've ever been taught to search for the truth and that's something that's hard for people to let go of.

 

Not able to see the full study but interesting research which may potentially better our understanding of consciousness... The abstract

The active electrical properties of dendrites shape neuronal input and output and are fundamental to brain function. However, our knowledge of active dendrites has been almost entirely acquired from studies of rodents. In this work, we investigated the dendrites of layer 2 and 3 (L2/3) pyramidal neurons of the human cerebral cortex ex vivo. In these neurons, we discovered a class of calcium-mediated dendritic action potentials (dCaAPs) whose waveform and effects on neuronal output have not been previously described. In contrast to typical all-or-none action potentials, dCaAPs were graded; their amplitudes were maximal for threshold-level stimuli but dampened for stronger stimuli. These dCaAPs enabled the dendrites of individual human neocortical pyramidal neurons to classify linearly nonseparable inputs—a computation conventionally thought to require multilayered networks.

Dendritic action potentials and computation in human layer 2/3 cortical neurons

 

Basically, in humans, these neurons produce more "complex" signals to dendrites than what had been previously been found in mice studies.

 

There can't ultimately be an understanding of consciousness.

 

^
There technically is already an understanding of consciousness. And this understanding could likely be improved.

 

There's an understanding in so much as we experience it. You can't come from your point of awareness and just proclaim that it's sufficient for a complete and total comprehension of anything, though. To do otherwise is to make one glaring assumption. And there's no conceivable means around this utter flaw in your reasoning. You will never, NEVER, be able to sufficiently explain it. You can't use your brain to point to your brain and say "I've figured it out." It's the most classic case of circular reasoning.

Besides the fact that it's circular reasoning, you could at least fess up to the fact that there are a plethora of dimensions to the world we aren't capable of comprehending. If you don't have a complete comprehension of the environment, which we don't, you have no comprehensive understanding of anything that exists within it. It isn't just consciousness we don't understand; it's literally everything. That's the profound truth that I hope people realize.

All we can hope to do is make predictions based on what we can perceive as humans. The fatal flaw is mistaking this for a knowledge of what the sheer essence of reality actually is.

Not only do we not know, we can't possibly know. And that, in the end, will be our reality tomorrow as it is today.

 

I agree to certain extent, but GB wasn't hinting at ultimate or complete understanding. Just making it better, gaining more insight about it. Which we likely will

 

You can't glean fundamental insight into something you can't prove you witness accurately.