"Loose" v "tight" circumcision

Are you cut or uncut? If cut, do you have a loose or tight or regular cut?

A "loose" circumcision is one with only a little of the foreskin cut off, so it often overlaps some of the head or glans when flaccid (soft) and there is even a little loose skin left on the shaft when erect.

A "regular" circumcision is one with a little skin (or "wrinkles") bunched up behind the glans when flaccid, but fully stretched out when hard.

A "tight" circumcision is one with all of the foreskin removed, so that some of the scrotal skin may ride up the shaft when erect. In some "tight" circumcisions the frenulum (or frenum) is removed, which is not good. The frenulum is the stringy thing in the inverted "V" just behind the glans on the underside which when stretched during an erection increases sexal desire.

My survey is as follows:

For circumcised men:

1. Is your cut "loose", "regular" or "tight"?

2. For men circumcised in adulthood, did you notice a decreased sensitivity without your foreskin?

3. Do you have your frenulum?

4. Would you rather be uncut?

For uncut men:

1. Are you "naturally circumcised", i.e., does you foreskin stay naturally retracted without a circumcision, even when soft?

2. Does your foreskin retract fully when you are erect?

3. Have you had any infections under your foreskin?

4. Would you rather be circumcised?

For both groups, please state your age, where you live, and if cut, where and when it was done.

Thank you very much for doing this survey. I am a lay sex therapist, and the results of this survey may be helpful to the young men and women I counsel.

 

30, NEUSE, Natural, 1. no - wouldn't like it; 2. yes; 3. No; 4. For gods' sake, No! Why?

 

What the hell is the fascination with circumcision every part of the forum has had for the past 2 weeks? Whatever though, I'll answer

I'd say my penis falls into the regular cut category.

1. Regular
2. I was done at birth, or around it.
3. Yes, pretty sure that's what I'm seeing down there anyways.
4. No, I prefer to be cut, and just about every girl I know has also said she prefers a cut penis.

 

About time these debates on getting prick cut should infact be circumsized.

 

I hope others will post here for this poll and not be turned off by London John. I did not set up the poll right, however, and you are only allowed one answer, so please respond to the most important question for you personally in the poll and then supplement your thoughts in the text below. Cutted

 

This survey has not gotten a lot of attention so far, even though it addresses an important subject. I hope some of you will answer it who have not done so. It would be OK for women to answer it for your man if you wish.

 

I am one hundred percent un-mutilated. What a shame!

 

I guess nobody's cut, nobody knows if they are loose, regular or tight, or nobody cares.

 

Actually I care. And I was curious.

 

i would describe my cut as being between a regular and a tight cut.

 

Circumcision is a barbaric, idiotic bit of cruelty used to torture and disfigure the babies of aggressively ignorant people. I'm glad to say I'm not mutilated at all.

 

Circumcision may be a necessity in this modern world of rampant STDs and AIDS, unless sex without condoms is made unlawful. It is no more a barbaric act than is removing an infected tooth or giving a flu shot- which also may be painful and could (but rarely) have complications, just like circumcision.

 

Circumcision has nothing to do with STDs, lol.
Nor does it have anything to do with cleanliness, or unprotected sex.

That was funny, though

 

grim no offense. but this thread wasn't here to argue circumcision it was to see what types of circumcision men have!!

 

We need more responses to this post.

 

.

 

Circumcised myself.

Really tight. Dont have any skin to play with. I can jerk it a bit, but not even up to the rim of the head.

The frenulum is gone. I was gutted for a long time when I found this out, and would love to have one sooooo badly. My buddy tells me how good one feels. And I read stories on the net all the time about how guys can just get off by rubbing it, saying its the most amazingly intense feeling they can have.

Cant say I'd want to be uncut. If I woke up one day and there was foreskin there, I wouldnt complain either.

I think cut looks way better than foreskin, although in England women are more familiar with a guy with a foreskin. And I know that masturbation would feel way better with a foreskin, as my head must be less sensative than if it still had skin. But if I had my choice with anything it would be Cutted's circumision. Being cut. Having enough skin to pull over the head, but having a nice sensative frenulum to go with it.

 

Extreme Phoenix - I think a regular or tight cut looks better than a loose cut like I have when it is soft, since there is no loose skin bunched up behind the coronal ridge of the glans, but erect, it is great to have that extra skin, both for intercourse and masturbation.

Uncut guys have a more sensitive glans, since it is covered unless it is in action, but uncut guys often have more problems with premature ejaculation, and the foreskin often slips back over the head during intercourse on the outthrust, which lessens the friction of the coronal ridge on the vaginal walls, which is most pleasurable for both participants.

There are also cleanliness issues for an uncut penis, unless the guy is careful to wash it every day, and some uncut guys have to pull back their foreskin with both hands when peeing to avoid spraying in unintended directions. I can use one hand.

And 10-15% of uncut guys cannot fully retract their foreskins, and go through life with only half the pleasure the rest of us feel, unless they get circumcised, or have an operation to lengthen the frenulum (the stringy thing in the "inverted v" on the underside of the glans).

So be grateful for what you've got. Nothing is perfect.

 

Probably out of date lol. tight/no frenulum/miss this pleasure of jacking!

 

I think cutted gave up or shriveled with his glans.