After the eighth school shooting in seven weeks – some gun control proposals

That story against how many teachers in the US? Which would you rather gave, armed staff with one or two children killed or unarmed staff with 17 killed?

 

Yes, I'll take one or two, please. (just not mine. Maybe yours.)

 

A fench and some barbed wire perhaps.

 

Jesus. Christ.

 

I wonder if my local bakery would bake me n AR-15 cake. If not, I’ll sue for discrimination

 

Who told you that that's a legal gun?

 

They'll make it.

 

The school board has scheduled an all-afternoon meeting . Some local war vets have an educational proposal
to present and demonstrate : Familiarity with Weapons and Live-fire for Children . I hear this will include their
cannon actually blowing up something (the one they fire for football touchdowns) .

 

More of the same shit. Kids with guns. Blow stuff up.

Yeehaa. Awesome.

 

If you like being laughed at in your face (and you sound more and more like you do on these issues) please do!

Some say "Everything is allowed in love and war". I would say "Everything is allowed in art and baked goods"

edit: slight nuance: except being dishonest on the ingredient list naturally

 

Not

LOL well not as big a hardon that some gun owners seem to have for their guns.

So you partially answer the question - yes – you want guns so you can kill law enforcement officers if you so desire.

To kill those you don’t like if they don’t do as you wish.

You need guns as a means of threating anyone with death if things don’t go your way.

But the question still stands – when would you start killing the police officers and your enemies?

You’ve admitted you would do so now can you tell me when exactly that would happen, what would be the trigger?

 

Not

This is a bit garbled – but let’s see - you don’t want to ban assault rifles because although they have the potential to kill lots of people they haven’t done that much killing so far?

Thing is that saying you don’t care about ‘little’ things like Parkland and Las Vegas etc etc etc and that to you having easy access to assault rifles is more important that those lives lost, it isn’t a rational or reasonable argument it just comes across as selfish and callous.

 

Not

So let’s recap – your stance (and that of many others in the gun lobby) is that you want easy access to very dangerous guns in your society because you want them yourself so you have the ability to threaten your ‘enemies’ with death and so you don’t care about the collateral damage done to people and your society because of that stance.

That doesn’t come across as rational it comes across as deeply paranoid and narcissistic.

 

Not

Sorry the fact is that in the US the demographic for gun ownership leans to white male and right wing

And it is mainly that group that are most vocal in opposing prudent gun control

But for me it is the right wing trait that seems to be the most significant element in opposing gun control (an old survey found that some 80% of gun owners who say they belong to the NRA identify as having a right wing political viewpoint, I’m guessing that is higher amongst the active membership these days)

And as explained this seems to be connected to a certain right wing ideology that is prevalent in the US.

 

Well , I believe the theory of letting children to be near and hear gunshots is mostly to lessen
anxiety and hysteria . Respect comes from reality . I think at the meeting I'll offer to bring the dog
and the possum to school . This would be a lesson in playing dead .

Possum fools that dog every time . It's funny .

 

Rather than force teachers to be armed, or force schools to be gun free zones. How about letting the schools make that decision? And let the parents decide what schools to send their children to.

Give more people freedom of choice, rather than allow the political elite to tell us what is best for us.

 

Right on, 6. So far it appears most of the people that are in some way connected to schools (parents, students, teachers, etc.) seem to crave better gun control.