9/11

Again, you have provided no evidence.

 

US government/military nanothermite, which was discovered by US military scientists in the 1990s, was found in abundance in WTC dust. It had no legal or legitimate reason to be there. The explosive residue/by products of these nanothermite reactions were also found in WTC dust. Iron microspheres, a major by product of thermitic reactions was found to be about 6% of WTC dust, which means that a lot of nanothermite was used.

https://benthamopen.com/contents/pdf/TOCPJ/TOCPJ-2-7.pdf

How did all this super explosive nanothermite and its by products get into WTCs 1 & 2 and into WTC7 when "hijackers" could not have planted it? Planting explosives for a controlled demolition takes weeks, at the least.

 

Ahahahahaha, backyard metal casting.com

Ahahahahaha

Oh, the colour of melted down soda cans isnt the same colour as whatever mixture poured out of the wtc, even though, is actually about the same consistency.

Lolz, very scientific

Backyard metal casting, oh you are killing me.

Seriously though? I look at that consistency, probably was alumuminium mixed with a vaporized fridge or whatever pouring out that impact crater at the wtc

 

No one found any nanothermite, stop making stuff up

 

Your lack of anything remotely approaching evidence tells us that you are BSing everyone.

 

Thermite is a mix of Ferrous Oxide (rust ) and aluminium of course there are gonna be traces (did they say how much ) It would take a pile of thermite Bigger than both those buildings to bring them down !! bet there were traces of lots of stuff in the rubble !

 

Does anybody else get it? Or is it just me? Lol.
"oh certain dust was or wasn't found, this means the air planes must not have been hijacked"

 

Two posts above this one is a link to the scientific paper that describes the nanothermite found in WTC dust.

But as it seems you are troubled by myopic vision, let me help you.

Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

Niels H. Harrit*,1, Jeffrey Farrer2 , Steven E. Jones*,3, Kevin R. Ryan4 , Frank M. Legge5 , Daniel Farnsworth2 , Gregg Roberts6 , James R. Gourley7 and Bradley R. Larsen3 1 Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Denmark 2 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA 3 S&J Scientific Co., Provo, UT, 84606, USA 4 9/11 Working Group of Bloomington, Bloomington, IN 47401, USA 5 Logical Systems Consulting, Perth, Western Australia 6 Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Berkeley, CA 94704, USA 7 International Center for 9/11 Studies, Dallas, TX 75231, USA

Abstract: We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in all the samples we have studied of the dust produced by the destruction of the World Trade Center. Examination of four of these samples, collected from separate sites, is reported in this paper. These red/gray chips show marked similarities in all four samples. One sample was collected by a Manhattan resident about ten minutes after the collapse of the second WTC Tower, two the next day, and a fourth about a week later. The properties of these chips were analyzed using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The red material contains grains approximately 100 nm across which are largely iron oxide, while aluminum is contained in tiny plate-like structures. Separation of components using methyl ethyl ketone demonstrated that elemental aluminum is present. The iron oxide and aluminum are intimately mixed in the red material. When ignited in a DSC device the chips exhibit large but narrow exotherms occurring at approximately 430 ˚C, far below the normal ignition temperature for conventional thermite. Numerous iron-rich spheres are clearly observed in the residue following the ignition of these peculiar red/gray chips. The red portion of these chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic.

https://benthamopen.com/contents/pdf/TOCPJ/TOCPJ-2-7.pdf

 

Probably even traces of semen. there's always traces of semen.

 

Interesting video from a noted MIT Engineer

 

I don't mean to be rude but why are so many people so abysmally ignorant of the science and the facts?

The amounts were whatever it took for the controlled demoltions of WTCs 1, 2 & 7. Iron microspheres were about 6% of WTC dust which means that there was much nanothermite.

The molten/vaporized WTC structural steel could ONLY have come from this nanothermite.

This is nanothermite, NOT THERMITE, developed in the 1990s, by US military scientists. If you know nothing of this then you should not be flaunting your ignorance, Mallyboppa.

 

Still zero evidence for the USGOCT, Irm. Why?

 

I'm not even arguing your follied controlled demolition, I just want you to admit it stupid to suggest that what was found in rubble could even confirm or deny what happened in the air. They're not even related subjects lol.

 

This video is quite old but the speaker is dead on correct, hotwater. Thanks for injecting some sanity into the discussion.

As it happens, the Univ of Alaska, Fairbanks study of NIST's WTC7 study is soon to be made public. The forensic engineer who led the study said last year, when asked by a lawyer what the chances are of NIST's study being accurate, answered with one word - ZERO.

Further study over the past year shows that number, ZERO, remains true to today.

 

Because you can't.

Go ahead and explain your theory, Irm. Be specific. Right now you are all over the map. Include your science and your facts/evidence.

I'm sorry but "lol" just doesn't cut it as evidence.

 

Thanks, what the video does is it brings us back to the beginning, to the basics. The pancake theory is complete nonsense

 

On Sept 11, 2001, there were myriad eyewitnesses, reporters, firemen, police, ... who reported bombs and explosions in the twin towers. The seismic record describes a huge subterranean explosion [meaning within the basement levels B1, B2, etc] BEFORE the "plane" struck.

Eyewitnesses described the "plane" that allegedly hit WTC2 as not a passenger jet.

On day two, the narrative all changed, bombs and explosions were out, and the nonsense started, "jet fuel melted the steel", blah blah blah.

Jon Cole catalogs the US government cover up in this great video.

Jonathan Cole - 9/11 Theories: Expert vs. Expert - AE911Truth.org

 

You want to tell them how big your magic steel iron balls are?



Lolz, we have all burnt steel wool as a kid.

That thing is less than the width of a steel wool strand, i could melt that with a cigarette lighter.

Copy and pasted from ae911truth.org no less

Lolz, pathetic

 

I've stated this umpteen times and you have yet to actually answer the question or justify your reasons.

How can you know what happened on a plane mid air, in flight, 1000 miles away, from the debris left behind from a tower that collapsed?

No point giving me scientific formulas for steel. That doesn't tell me what happened in the air.

No point giving me information about dust. That doesn't tell me what happened in the air.

No point giving me controlled demolition reports, that doesn't tell me what happened in the air.

All you've given me is useless information that doesn't tell us what happened in the air. Melting steel temperatures, dust particles etc. It has nothing to do with the question you're asking me to ask you. So stop bringing it up, it just shows that you have no answer for my question.

The only answer you can possibly fathom is, that you earnestly believe that no planes ever hit the buildings, in which case, you should have gone to specsavers.

 

No, the seismic thing is complete bullshit, stop making stuff up

So you are getting everything from this website then