It isn't my version, McFuddy. Science requires precision and US government conspiracy theorists never can provide that. They can't provide any evidence for their conspiracy theory. Your post is devoid of evidence. Correct?
I don't know why you have to have this explained to you. VG and all the rest of the US government conspiracy theorists can't provide any evidence, not one piece of evidence for their specious nonsensical fairy tale. On the side of truth, there is voluminous evidence against the government fairy tale. He, all the US government conspiracy theorists, have zero evidence. Look at your own post.
One doesn't have to reframe anything. There has never been any evidence for the USGOCT. There was an elaborate charade but when one measures it against science it is no contest. The USGOCT fails every time. Why? Because there is no actual evidence for it. Notice how you have no evidence, McF.
Still no evidence from you, VG, for your totally wacky USGOCT. Yet you still go on embarrassing yourself.
This is your bosses bio: I stand corrected, "working on construction documents for" so he isnt even an Architect, well, no one will hire him as an architect You wil notice he doesnt even list his education level
I'm sorry. You did not explain it satisfactory. You seem to call your convo partners with opposite stances simply a conspiracy theorist to discredit them/their points. And because they see more in the governments story than yours (cant blame them so far). But even if the government or a part of it really are conspiracy theorists...: that doesn't actually make people who see more in the official story than yours also conspiracy theorists.
i reckon you are this guy: Director of Strategy and development - which basically means viral marketing by way of internet message boards, Say there you moved to New York two weeks before 9/11, maybe it was you that brought down the twin towers. A volunteer for the rethink campaign, so basically, they didnt pay you 2009 through to 2013 BTW, its suppose to be masters of. not master of I'm not even going to bother checking if public policy is actually a postgrad degree
Damn VG I go to sleep for five hours & you're still here fightin' this shit when I get back up. Respectable commitment
When a moving body collides with a body of the same composition, two things happen. The moving body is slowed down, and the stationary body is moved. Do you disagree with that statement? Getting you to answer this is like pulling teeth. Just a yes or no will do.
You haven't addressed the fact that the USGOCT has no evidence and need I say it, you haven't provided any either. Molten/vaporized WTC structural steel, all by its lonesome, sinks the USGOCT. You do understand why, don't you?
You reckon everything silly and nonsensical but still you can't provide any evidence for the USGOCT, VG. Lame lame lame.
Reckon I got as much evidence for as you do against. Let me make some eggs, taters, & coffee & we'll see where it stands
Okay, it's obvious that no one disagrees with the statement that when a moving body collides with a body of the same composition, two things happen. The moving body is slowed down, and the stationary body is moved. Therefore, that point stands. The next question is, how is it that the upper block of the North Tower fell through the intact core structure below for the first 360 feet at a rate just 40 feet shy of freefall?