9/11

I wasn't taking any stance or trying to prove stuff. You are and you seem to try to turn it around against everyone who's not with you
I wonder why people who are certain they have convincing evidence resort to lame rhetoric games..

 

This thread is disgusting.

 

You have seen the convincing evidence, Asm, but you are ignoring it.

Explain if you will how alleged hijackers melted and vaporized WTC structural steel.

Explain if you will how alleged hijackers melted molybdenum, 3,180F.

Explain if you will how alleged hijackers caused WTC7 to fall at free fall speed.

Explain if you will how alleged hijackers made John Gross of NIST lie about the molten/vaporized steel when he had seen and touched it himself.

 

It is disgusting, isn't it, NR.

When the US government murders 2,996 of its own, then poisons untold numbers with the dust and contaminants from their controlled demolitions of three WTC towers, murders millions overseas and there are people lamely try to defend this deep deep evil, it is really way more than disgusting.

 

You call you scientifically backing up your theories (which is what they are) convincing evidence. But it appears it has not convinced anyone (here at least).
I was simply reading this thread's discussion, which get ruined every few pages because of unneccesary rhetoric games and an overall lack of respect for each other. This is what i felt like pointing out. People with convincing evidence and an urge to spread the truth (as they see it) don't have to resort to that and shouldn't even want to: it will not end in others taking them or their content more seriously at all

I won't... thanks

 

Nevermind

 

Actually Its your Ignorance thats Astounding me your arguments are all cut and paste from Conspiracy theories Lol

 

I hope he gets paid well.

 

Alright buckle up folks it's gonna be a rough ride.

@camlok @storch you both have taken the "evidence" asserted by others & claimed that "evidence" to be 100% fact & inherently flawless in nature. Neither of you has, presumably, the time or resources to test these claims yourselves but apparently that doesn't matter to you. Have you ever seen a thermite demolition in person? Have you ever witnessed an implosion on the scale of the twin towers? Have you ever been on a jet that is collidin' with something in mid air or on the other end witnessing the results of said collision from the building? Have you ever tested the meltin' temperature of high grade steel or the actual temperature at which jet fuel burns? Have you ever even assisted in a demolition a third the scale of the twin towers? No. You both only "know" what you've been told or read & you've no way of verifyin' the validity of the given "evidence". How can either of you claim truth when you can't even verify the honesty behind the things you claim?

It's all just fuckin' faith. These evidences are your God & you can only say "Look! It must be true!"

 

... Some mothers, do ave 'em.

 

The distance by which you missed my point was phenomenally far

 

You're the one that has believed what you were told, despite evidence to the contrary of what you believe.

Here, let me illustrate:

Okay, it's obvious that no one disagrees with the statement that when a moving body collides with a body of the same composition, two things happen. The moving body is slowed down, and the stationary body is moved. Therefore, that point concerning the upper block dropping through the lower core structure as if it weren't there stands.

The next question is, how is it that the upper block of the North Tower fell through the intact core structure below for the first 360 feet at a rate just 40 feet shy of freefall?
_________________________________________________________________________

It appears that you people in the "know" are refusing to acknowledge this point and the following question. I believe it's because the point and the following question leaves you with a problem. But I'll again ask all of you who so far have contributed nothing but insults to the thread to address the point and the question I've posed.

 

What is it @Asmodean is always so fond of sayin'? "Pics or it didn't happen!" or some shit like that

 

What is it that you think didn't happen concerning my point? Be specific.

When a moving body collides with a body of the same composition, two things happen. The moving body is slowed down, and the stationary body is moved.

Agree, or disagree?

 

Nothin' in particular. The whole point is inherently invalid because it's based on faith. You got no proof because you've never actually tested any of these claims upon which your foundation is built. Your entire argument is akin to sayin'

"God made the 9-11 hijackers do what they done. It was His will therefore it had to happen." Equally ludicrous & unsubstantiated claims

 

No, the collapse of the North Tower is on video. It shows that, for the first 360 feet of descent, it dropped just 40 feet shy of freefall. No faith required for that.

The point I've made is that when a moving body collides with a body of the same composition, two things happen. The moving body is slowed down, and the stationary body is moved. The question to you is? Do you agree or disagree with that point. A yes or no will do.

 

Golly, people are dumb.

 

Now that's a compelling argument, Asmo, folks who can't face reality haven't been convinced.

You get yourself all upset about a wee bit of incivility, I can handle it, but you aren't the least bit bothered by the US government murdering 2,996 in the twin towers, millions more around the world, all due to these wholly transparent US government 9/11 lies.

I know you won't because you can't. No one here has either because no one can. You all know the USGOCT is one huge lie and you, seemingly, are content with their carnage and murder. So be it.

 

What people are doing is way way way more than dumb, nst, what they are doing is incredibly evil, evil on a Nazi like scale, knowing what they know, the USGOCT is an impossible fable, and still they offer their support, still the defend those who have committed so many crimes against humanity.

 

You are woefully ignorant of the science, the facts, the truth about 9/11. You have offered absolutely nothing but the inane ramblings of a person who is "woefully ignorant of the science, the facts, the truth about 9/11".

You can't provide any evidence for the existence of any hijackers. You vacate your brain and let US propaganda fill it.