9/11

Another of VG's flat out lies. Always with zero evidence. Just deny deny deny lie lie lie, repeated over and over.

One of the reviewers, a top US physicist, one of the scientists who was given moon rocks by NASA to study, went public to dispel these crazy lies about the paper not being peer reviewed.

Notice how VG has no evidence, EVER, for his lies.

 

More of your silly desperation, VG, no evidence and no credentials.

 

Go ahead and discuss what you feel is important, what you feel is evidence for the USGOCT which has never had one piece of evidence ever provided for it. Come on, RH, why do you so vehemently deny reality. That is the hallmark of USGOCT conspiracy theorists.

Look in VG's posts, there's also no evidence there, EVER, for the USGOCT.

 

NIST states that the Pancake Theory of Collapse is bogus. Why are you so ignorant about the facts and the science and the events surrounding 9/11?

 

Ooh, i made one spelling mistake, Score!!!!

One point to you, I am going to need some Aloe for that burn

Ahahahahaha.

 

Did Anybody Watch This Video....???....It's 47 Minutes Long.....And As Such Should Give

Both Of You 47 Minutes To "Cool Off"......



Cheers Glen.

 

I am fine, i can multitask, I am watching Gogglebox at the same time, i will find that video and post it for you soon, coffee and biscuits first though

 

Here is the video Glenglen was talking about

 

Bingo
9/11 Conspiracy Theories - World Trade Center - Debunking the Myths

 

Thank You VG.........So.. Hands Up How Many Of You Watched This Video....???



Cheers Glen.

 

You are acting like a true Conspiracy advocate. If someone disagrees with you you throw a hissy fit and act like a child. Keep your head up your ass, it’s a good look for you. Adios. Oh, got you a trophy.

 

Well no, that's not the best I've got. I provided an argument for the implausibility of a virtual freefall of the upper block of the North Tower for the first 360 feet of drop. You've offered nothing in response except to express your irritation at being asked to address that impossibility, which is really not a response at all, but rather a reaction.

 

I'm afraid that saying that doesn't change the fact that the upper block of the North Tower descended through the intact core structure below a rate just 40 feet shy of freefall through the first 360 feet of drop. You believe that it's reasonable to assume that if a bowling ball was dropped from the roof of the North Tower at the same time that the collapse began, the roof would be only 40 feet behind the bowling ball. You say that the internal structure (the core) was still intact, and yet the antenna which was positioned in the center of the building dropped right through it as if it wasn't there. I think you should probably watch a video of the collapse of the North Tower so that you can avoid making claims that come back to bite you in the ass.

So the question remains: Is it reasonable to assume that the more heat damaged upper block would maintain it's integrity to the extent that it would destroy the intact core structure below at virtual freefall speed?

 

No one has responded to that becuase you arent making any sense, you rant about the freefall of the top of the tower based on the assumption that the "internal structure" is in tact

If the "internal structure" is intact

A) That means you are admitting there are no magic mystical thermite explosions

B) It is self evident, if the "internal structure" is intact, no its not going to freefall

C) Then you go on to oh it didnt freefall quite like it should, why do you assume it would? Give the example of a bowling ball falling at the same speed....but that would have to mean that "internal structure" wasnt intact

You have read some site of some video where some other guy is ranting about this, thought to yourself, oh, that makes sense, without it registering, no it doesnt make sense either way: internal structure intact why would it freefall, if not intact why would you assume it would freefall?

D) 360/40, is that 360.00/40.00 exactly from what time? Even if you wanted to do a floor to floor calculation on the conservation of momentum, you are starting off with a margin of error that multiplied by 110 floors later is going to make the end result nonsense, like that Dr Denning twit that assumed every floor was the same weight and each time there was only a single force pointing downwards

Thats why no one has bothered replying, you dont seem to understand what you are asking

 

What the hell are you talking about? what is the "intact core structure"

 

This is a classic denialist argument. You believe that if someone can't tell you who did it, why they did it, and how they did it, then you don't have to explain how the upper block of the North Tower dropped through the core structure below at a rate just 40 feet shy of freefall through a 360 drop; that the more heat damaged upper block would maintain its integrity to the extent that it would destroy the intact core structure below?

 

Look, show me the site or video you are getting this from

i understand camlocks motivations, he is just pawning for clicks to his bosses websites

But your motivations ??? You have repeated that like 30 times now

 

The reported explosions were at intervals that do not correspond to the speed at which the building collapsed. I'm not going to tell you to shut the fuk up, but it would be in your own self interest to research these things before posting.