9/11

THAT video is your evidence?! LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL Please someone post a real video now of how the twin towers supposedly collapsed. I'd genuinely like to see an explanation. Not a video that takes 47 minutes to get to "don't trust the truss" and then plays some shit graphic of trusses failing.

 

Yes It Is neo.....



Cheers Glen.

 

You're becoming more confused. I don't assume it would freefall. After repeating my position over and over, I have to believe that you're having problems with your short term memory. I don't know how you could think that that is my position.

My point is that the upper block of the North Tower fell through the core structure below at virtual freefall speed, and that that goes against the laws of physics. At this point, I'm sure you've never researched the composition of the Towers because if you had, you'd see the ridiculousness of what you're defending.

 

Yup, I was right. Now why don't you go and do some research on the makeup of the core structure of the towers. Then you'll know what you're talking about.

 

You seem genuinely ignorant of what's been declared. The point is that the core structure below the impact zone should have resisted the fall of the core structure above the impact zone. But it was shown to have not resisted. That means there was more than just gravity at work. Do you get it now?

 

Well, Glen, I'm afraid that's a fail. Nice propaganda piece, though, British narrator and everything. You almost forget that they're not bothering to explain how the towers collapsed.

 

You are making multiple mistakes, VG and you are also never provided any evidence for your goofy USGOCT. You are just a crank conspiracy theorist for a zero evidence USGOCT.

 

People who don't get this have no idea how physics works.

 

That would be a core structure that is intact. It was actually quite self explanatory.

 

Still no evidence, VG, you an't even discuss anything from your "sources" because you know it will fall flat. You can't wish away the molten/vaporized WTC steel, the US government nanothermite, the WTC7 free fall, ... all of the impossibilities that sink the USGOCT.

 

VG and me??

 

Still no evidence from any USGOCT conspiracy theorist, VG, certainly none from you.

 

Ok, but what do YOU call the core structure, the centre steel beams only, or all other materials from how far from the external wall of the building, Give me a far clearer definition. And the height of this core structure, what floor does it start/end?

and "virtual" freefall. Give me YOUR definition of virtual, or do you just mean freefall

 

RH, you haven't provided on speck of evidence, you haven't been able to discuss anything about 9/11, none of you have because you USGOCT conspiracy theorists are woefully ignorant of the science and the facts of 9/11. That is so abundantly apparent because AGAIN none of you can give any evidence or rational arguments for your nutty, zero evidence USGOCT.

 

So steel vaporized now?

 

Are you really just going to keep parroting that?

 

A classic USGOCT conspiracy theorist's song and dance routine. Talk about all sorts of inane minutia, pretending that it means something and you know about the science and events of 9/11. It's all bafflegab, which is all USGOCT conspiracy theorists do.

Give SOME EVIDENCE for the USGOCT, VG.

 

See,what I mean, just nonsense from the USGOCT conspiracy theorists. You aren't even ignorant of this, you are just lying.

 

The fact that you have to ask what I'm referring to when I mention the core structure tells me that I've been talking to someone who doesn't even know the parameters of that which is being discussed. You're even asking me the height of the core structure; what floor it starts on. Anyone who has done even a minimal amount of research into the construction of the Towers is reading what you're writing and shaking their heads.

Is there anything else you'd like to add?

 

Why can't you provide any evidence for the USGOCT, lead conspiracy theorist?