Yes, the precedent of Graham v. Connor still seems to be in effect and seems more relevant than ever. As legal precedents go, 30 years is not that old. Why would the requirement of objective reasonableness be lifted during rioting and looting, especially when the rioting and looting are purportedly occasioned by officers who failed to use the standard?
Why don't you try thinking with your head instead of your gut for a change? You might get better results. I think getting Trump out of the picture could have a calming effect. I seriously doubt that Biden and Harris are about to do anything too radical to inflame the situation, but the pressure on the police will still be there as long these incidents of killing unarmed black men keep happening.
You misspelled Faux News... I have wondered that too. I've been in hundreds of protests with never a violent moment until the cops arrived with their billy clubs.
Why is it always about "black men"? Don't white men ever get killed? And if what you say comes to pass, who will the millions who support President Trump vote for? Mr Biden? Gimme a break even the liberals don't really want him. If and when the Democrats come to power it won't be Mr Biden who calls the shots. Correct me if I'm wrong please.
Come on really? Is it the police who cause rioting, burning & looting? Even you can't really believe such drivel. Sitting on the sidelines as we do, can any of us judge a police officer? The left use one angle and the right another when they show videos.
The articles are based on the 2019 study by a team of researchers from Rutgers and the University of Michigan: F. Edwards, H. Lee, and M. Esposito, "Risk of Beiing Killed by Police Use of Force in the United States by Age, Race-Ethnicity, and Sex", published in the prestigious Proceedings of the National Academy .Risk of being killed by police use of force in the United States by age, race–ethnicity, and sex The study considered CDC data but found it inadequate because it relied on reporting by police departments and underreported police killings by about 50%.
Black men are about 2.5 times more likely to be killed by police than white men. .Risk of being killed by police use of force in the United States by age, race–ethnicity, and sex It's a binary choice. The polls show Biden leading even in the swing states. Maybe they'll vote for Kanye at the last minute, but I doubt it. At least it won't be Trump who's calling the shots. That's the important thing. Is there a "riot" in a neighborhood near you? Particularly where there are riots over police abuses, we need officers with good judgment and professionalism calling the shots--not running riot themselves. My sisters attended the protest against the WHO in Seattle back in 1999. It turned into a police riot after a bunch of black-masked anarchists showed up and started smashing things: police spraying bystanders with mace, etc. Not good. One officer fired his weapon point blank into a group of demonstrators to prevent access to the WTO. How Seattle Police in 1999 Set the Terrible Example Others Have Followed Ever Since Today in history: The WTO riots shut down downtown
"Gentlemen, get the thing straight once and for all – the policeman isn't there to create disorder, the policeman is there to preserve disorder." ~ Richard J. Daley
Calling back the past now and quoting stuff you should know is dubious in the extreme. Scared little puppy indeed!.
One grain of rice? They weren’t rookies, they were veteran cops out on the streets for decades. Imagine the untold damage they likely caused including false arrests and imprisonment of innocent men and women. btw If one grain of rice is tainted with bacterial blight, the whole harvest is in question
Calling back the past is dubious in the extreme? Quoting stuff I should know is dubious in the extreme? (BTW, who'd I quote?) No wonder you're a Trump supporter.( A sick little puppy at that.)The past is history. Those who don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it. (Santayana) And not quoting stuff I should know (or not giving credit) would be plagiarism. Didn't they teach you that in obedience school? You've just pretty much discredited yourself as somebody who has anything intelligent to say. You seem to think that stating raw opinion unsupported by fact is something wonderful.
I think they are, but the thing is, everybody else has the same right, and if you express a dumb one, expect people to call you on it.
You're in a focused panic about the scraped elbow while the body has one leg broken and half torn off.
Because you don't get to decide what is hip. If the MSM and establishment are on your side, you're not the revolutionary anymore.