The Donald Trump Score Card

The Feds Are Now Investigating Whether Trump Tampered With Classified Documents
Ryan Bort
May 12, 2022 3:21PM ET

The Feds Are Now Investigating Whether Trump Tampered With Classified Documents

excerpt:

"Federal prosecutors have launched a grand jury investigation into whether the trove of classified White House documents that wound up in Mar-a-Lago were tampered with, The New York Times reported on Thursday.

The National Archives discovered in January that former President Donald Trump took boxes of official documents to Palm Beach upon leaving the White House. Some of those boxes were clearly labeled as classified, raising questions about whether Trump may have violated the Presidential Records Act. The discovery was made as the Archives were retrieving the material after it was subpoenaed by the Jan. 6 committee.

Trump spokesperson Taylor Budowich responded on Thursday by bashing the investigation as political. “President Trump consistently handled all documents in accordance with applicable law and regulations,” he said. “Belated attempts to second-guess that clear fact are politically motivated and misguided.”

It would be putting it lightly to say there’s suspicion over whether the material was mishandled. The Washington Post reported in January that some of the documents delivered to the committee had been torn apart and taped back together. The Post later reported that the president regularly ripped up official documents throughout his time in office. “He didn’t want a record of anything,” a former senior Trump official told the Post. “He never stopped ripping things up. Do you really think Trump is going to care about the Records Act? Come on.”

Trump didn’t just rip up documents he wanted to destroy. Maggie Haberman of the Times reported in February that the White House staff often found the former president’s toilet clogged with wads of paper. Trump called the allegation “categorically untrue,” but Jennifer Jacobs of Bloomberg said that she’d also been told the staff often found Trump’s toilet clogged, and they they believed Trump had ripped up paper and tried to flush it."

 

A year and half later and these Trump supporters still can't accept the fact that he lost.

He lost so there must be voter fraud, somewhere, anywhere, perhaps under this rock or behind this tree...lol..

Trump supporter 'went off the deep end' while doing voter fraud inquiry at Washington man's home

A resident of Bremerton, Washington is calling foul after being accosted by a Trump supporter at his doorstep over potential "voter fraud."

As the Seattle Times reports, an organization called the Washington Voter Research Project has been sending canvassers door to door to ask residents about their voter registration status in an effort to find "voter fraud" in the state.

Bremerton resident Michael Simonds tells the newspaper that he came away disturbed after one canvasser came to his door recently and "kind of went off the deep end" when she started ranting about undocumented immigrants and forging ballot signatures.

Even more disturbingly, Simonds said that the woman falsely implied she was there on behalf of the county auditor's office, which is something that Spokane County Auditor Vicky Dalton tells the Seattle Times is simply not true.

“We don’t do this kind of doorbelling or canvassing door-to-door,” she said. “We don’t sponsor it, we don’t endorse it, nobody is doing this under our authority.”

 

OK, like the reasonable, educated, scientific sane people we are - How many MILLIONS of forged signatures would it have taken to throw the election? Something like that would have too many pieces, too many people to blab, too many smoking guns.

 

https://thehill.com/policy/national...quiries-for-jordan-extends-subpoena-deadline/

excerpt:

"The House select committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot has extended the deadline for Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) to comply with its subpoena, laying out in a letter its fullest accounting yet of the information it would like to discuss with him.

The correspondence to Jordan comes after he wrote a six-page letter to the panel demanding to see the bulk of evidence it has compiled concerning his actions after the 2020 presidential election and leading up to the Jan. 6 certification of its results.

The letter outlines eight topics on inquiry, including previously unreported efforts by Jordan to reach then-Attorney General William Barr the day before the 2020 election was called and to speak with President Trump’s then-chief of staff Mark Meadows about “efforts to pressure Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolfe to audit his state’s election results."”

 

"you better comply or we'll give you yet another line to cross.....there.....cross that one now.......now that one.........and this one....."

 

So, why do they give Jordan any time at all? You're in contempt, the officers of the court are at your door to bring you in - in handcuffs. Whoops, it's late now, you'll have to spend the night in lockup here, with your roommate pantless bubba.

 

'Outsider' in Nevada’s GOP Senate primary surges, rattling Trump's pick (msn.com)

 

Geeze, I wasn't even sure they still made boom boxes and gameboys.

 

Trump ally, Lesko, booed off stage.


Trump ally booed off stage during political speech at high school graduation ceremony

 

How John Durham's probe has exposed Trump's Russia con

excerpt:

"Yet after years of toil, Durham has produced nothing to suggest the Russia investigation was a Deep State hit-job against Trump. He has brought three cases that have nothing to do with the origins of the investigation. One involved an FBI lawyer who altered an email used to obtain a search warrant after the investigation was started. (The attorney pleaded guilty and was sentenced to a year of probation.) Another led to the indictment of Igor Danchenko, a source for the so-called Steele dossier, for allegedly lying to the FBI about his sources. His trial is scheduled to begin in October. This prosecution, too, has nothing to do with the origin or legitimacy of the FBI’s investigation, which was not triggered by the Steele reports. The third was the Sussmann case that just exploded in Durham’s face. It, too, was essentially unconnected to the FBI’s core investigation, given that the meeting in question happened months after the bureau began examining the Russian assault and that the FBI quickly dismissed the Trump-Alfa Bank tie.

Despite declaring over two years ago that he had reason to question the FBI’s opening of the Russia investigation, Durham has failed to make good on his assertion. His investigation has yielded zilch in this regard. His prosecutions are all sideshows.

But Durham has done Trump and his cultists a great favor by providing material they can exploit for one of their favorite pastimes: deflection."

 

But but but but Hillary's emails.......Hunter's laptop.......squirrel !!!!

 

The GOP’s New Election Rule: Voter Fraud Is Only Real When We Lose to Democrats

excerpt:

"One of the most hilarious parts of Donald Trump and company’s plot to overturn the 2020 election, insomuch as there’s anything funny about a stunted man-child’s fascist attempt to burn democracy to the ground, was the elected officials who insisted the presidential results were invalid due to fraud but accepted their wins further down the ballot. A short, noncomprehensive list of such people included representatives Stephanie Bice, Marjorie Taylor Greene, and Lauren Boebert and senators Roger Marshall, Tommy Tuberville, and Cindy Hyde-Smith, all of whom helped Trump further his baseless election-fraud claims while never once suggesting that the results of their own races were suspect. Now, with the 2022 midterms on the horizon, you might be wondering if Republicans will once again be trotting out the same claims of fraud for races that don’t turn out the way they want—while being all “nothing to see here!“ when things go their way. And the answer is yes, they undoubtedly will be, but before we get to that, let’s take a look at the incredible acts of hypocrisy and contortion that have been on display during the primary season.

Take Representative Mo Brooks, for example. As The New York Times notes, Brooks spent much of his campaign for Senate bragging about having “proudly stood with President Trump in the fight against voter fraud.” Indeed, Brooks played a role in Trump’s plot to steal a second term, urging the crowd at the “Stop the Steal” rally that preceded the January 6 insurrection to “do what it takes to fight for America.” But when he came in second in the Alabama Republican primary last week, leading to a runoff, he claimed possible voter fraud was the furthest thing from his mind. “If it’s a close race and you’re talking about a five- or 10-vote difference, well, then, it becomes a greater concern,” Brooks told the Times. “But I’ve got more important fish to fry. And so, at some point, you have to hope that the election system is going to be honest.” What changed? According to Brooks, who has spent much of the last 16 months claiming the 2020 election was rife with “massive voter fraud and election theft,” such concerns don’t apply to his primary because unlike Democrats, Republicans don’t commit voter fraud. “I’m in a Republican primary, and noncitizens don’t normally vote in Republican primaries,” Brooks explained."

 

Trump wants to get his 'reputation' back.


Trump threatens Pulitzer committee with legal action if they don't rescind award for Russia probe coverage

excerpt:

"Together with the publications that have obsessively promulgated disgustingly false attacks against me, you have done all you can to destroy my reputation," Trump said, asking, "how do I get my reputation back?"

 

Trump is really frustrated with Sussmann's acquittal.

 

‘It’s going to be an army’: Tapes reveal GOP plan to contest elections

excerpt:

"Video recordings of Republican Party operatives meeting with grassroots activists provide an inside look at a multi-pronged strategy to target and potentially overturn votes in Democratic precincts: Install trained recruits as regular poll workers and put them in direct contact with party attorneys.

The plan, as outlined by a Republican National Committee staffer in Michigan, includes utilizing rules designed to provide political balance among poll workers to install party-trained volunteers prepared to challenge voters at Democratic-majority polling places, developing a website to connect those workers to local lawyers and establishing a network of party-friendly district attorneys who could intervene to block vote counts at certain precincts.

“Being a poll worker, you just have so many more rights and things you can do to stop something than [as] a poll challenger,” said Matthew Seifried, the RNC’s election integrity director for Michigan, stressing the importance of obtaining official designations as poll workers in a meeting with GOP activists in Wayne County last Nov. 6. It is one of a series of recordings of GOP meetings between summer of 2021 and May of this year obtained by POLITICO."

 

Poor Diaper Donny haz a sad...