Climate Change

There are many people. Who for whatever reason. Refuse to look @ food ingredients. Or even if they do. Soaringly proclaim that. Any chemical element unless by scientific standards. Is perfectly safe to eat. But since deemed safe, is. Many people here. Refuse to eat certain foods. Still others consider organic consumers as crackpots. & mind u. Maybe not precisely here that skeptism. But i live among those of that ilk.

 

Some humans, are simply sorta addicted to certain scientific methods. In some cases. Control fouls results. Some realities simply are. It may be possible. That some of these. May be intelligent enough to remain hidden. Do you know what would happen if certain humans. Suddenly became aware of certain of their powers?

 

Quite obviously we aint ready for certain leaps en masse.

 

What humans might those be?

 

Learn how to use a period!

 

Greece makes 79 arson arrests over wildfires - BBC News

79 arrests 2 days ago shows that this is coordinated.

 

Ok so then the next time there’s Tornados or hot weather I don’t want to hear anyone crying about climate change lol. I will just quote you and say that “climate is different than weather.”

 

So is controlling the weather repeatedly over the course of years technically climate change?

 

If you’re skeptical about the source of my quote, here is a website from 2011 attempting to “debunk” the quote. It looks as if the original source of the quote has been officially memory-holed at this point, which does not surprise me.

Debunked: "Others are engaging even in an eco- type of terrorism"

Here’s the full dialogue:

“Cohen made the remark as part of an answer given at a conference, the Sam Nunn Policy Forum being hosted by the University of Georgia, "on Terrorism, Weapons of Mass Destruction, and U.S. Strategy", on April 28th 1997. His full answer is below, showing the quote in context. Emphasis mine.


Q: Let me ask you specifically about last week's scare here in Washington, and what we might have learned from how prepared we are to deal with that (inaudible), at B'nai Brith.

A: Well, it points out the nature of the threat. It turned out to be a false threat under the circumstances. But as we've learned in the intelligence community, we had something called -- and we have James Woolsey here to perhaps even address this question about phantom moles. The mere fear that there is a mole within an agency can set off a chain reaction and a hunt for that particular mole which can paralyze the agency for weeks and months and years even, in a search. The same thing is true about just the false scare of a threat of using some kind of a chemical weapon or a biological one. There are some reports, for example, that some countries have been trying to construct something like an Ebola Virus, and that would be a very dangerous phenomenon, to say the least. Alvin Toeffler has written about this in terms of some scientists in their laboratories trying to devise certain types of pathogens that would be ethnic specific so that they could just eliminate certain ethnic groups and races; and others are designing some sort of engineering, some sort of insects that can destroy specific crops. Others are engaging even in an eco- type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves.

So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations. It's real, and that's the reason why we have to intensify our efforts, and that's why this is so important.”

 

& some of the methods & tools. Utilized in achieving this. Are paranormal in nature. Is partially why they are getting away with it. As they well know how we are. Some of yall say these changes are nothing new. This is partially right. Especially when ya learn. Just who these are doing it.

 

Assuming that this quote is correct, it's a discussion about a hypothetical capability. It doesn't mean the when there's an earthquake or volcanic eruption that a terror group from a James Bond film is behind it.

I think it's at least plausible that there could be terror groups that deliberately set fires, but the supply of dead wood and dry grass would be the fundamental factor that would make this successful. In other words, it's climate change that has created conditions that allow for these mass scale fires, whether they're started lightning, accidents, lone arsonists, or organized arsonists.

 

This is pretty disingenuous and mental gymnastics.

If I were to switch this to “I think it’s at least plausible that there are gang rapes, but the supply of vulnerable drunk slutty women would be the fundamental factor that would make this successful. In other words, it’s women being so attractive and going out in a promiscuous manner that has created conditions that has allowed for these rapes, whether they happen accidentally, by lone rapists, or organized gang rapists”…

…I don’t think you would buy it.

 

Whats an end goal of science & engineering etc? Holography & mind controj etc are those goals.

 

& guess what. Our ancestors knew of these. & we are only just now rediscovering em. Took us a lil while.

 

While its partia
lly true. These changes r from our slashing trees. & burning alot. This is done enough here in the ozarks. Add our automobile addictions to that equation. Maybe on a normal basis. Nature can bounce back given time from some things. We did actually get some reprieve during covid.
But again. This is different. There are many factors involved. As well. The changes themselves sorta evolved as mentioned by chinacat. One of the reasons may be. That we may have handled previous changes to a certain extent.
But they are bothered by our unexpected developments. Thefore they had to pull harsher tactics. & these may occasionally run away from even their control.
Because of this & other factors. Our normal allies. Have been allowed to step in to a certain extent. I wish i could convey. Precisely who the culprits are. They are similar to james bond villians. But its worse than that. As dr. Mccoy said. A comprehensive timeline would be nice. Katrina provides an example.

 

Doesn’t climate change boil down to the statement that pollution is bad? The debate is about how much irreversible damage how much pollution create, and about how to balance the damage with the short-term needs of business