Oprah Winfrey should apologize

Power hungry thugs.
They'll stick a knife in you and smile the whole time.

 

Really? You're kidding me.
What was Trump convicted of? Details on the 34 counts and his guilty verdict
That would be the hush money coverup.

​

Jury finds Donald Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation in E. Jean Carroll case
That would be the Rape case.
Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll
A judge has now clarified that this is basically a legal distinction without a real-world difference. He says that what the jury found Trump did was in fact rape, as commonly understood.

And we have the six counts of tax fraud.

Then we have the cases that he wormed his way out of...money talks.
There's the discrimination case: "The case was settled in 1975 with no admission of guilt, but Trump was required to sign a document agreeing to change his rental practices."
He evaded his sexual predatory charges by 25 women, including one of his wives and a teenager by paying them off or threatening them.

Not to mention the Trump University fraud case.

And of course the federal indictments for insurrection, stealing top secret documents, and influencing an election that he will pardon himself for or order his underlings to "make disappear."

 

No, the energy should be spent fighting for the Constitution, law and order, the inclusion of all people and the freedom of those people to live their lives in peace without being told what religion to follow, what they're allowed to do with their body, or what books they can read.

The energy should be spent educating those poor lost souls that voted for a man convicted of 34 fraud felonies and rape because they think he's going to give them cheaper eggs. (The high price is caused by the avian influenza A(H5N1) virus)
They lost the election even though they think they won.

But why waste that energy trying to explain anything to those who voted for a con man?
As my father used to say, "You can learn the easy way or you can learn the hard way."
They are about to learn the hard way.

 

Shoe, I'm curious, what is it with you and Kamala's laugh?
Is that how you judge people's character, by the way they laugh?
Do you think you would like George Washington's laugh? How about Winston Churchill? Albert Einstein? Abraham Lincoln?
Maybe Donald Trump's laugh is the best and that's why he should be president...you like his laugh!

It seems to me that this is one of the major problems with our country today, we judge people by superficial characteristics, not the substance of their nature.
Joe Biden walks funny, Kamala Harris has a funny laugh, therefore they can't govern.
It may be related to a hegemonic male syndrome; the need felt by men who are not very confident in their own manhood to disparage women, non violent males, and others who they feel aren't "manly enough" They tend to identify with bullies and those who display what they perceive as a strong will to dominate others, thus allowing them to gain their own manhood by association.
Kamala can't govern, and is a bad person because she has a subjectively bad "cackling" laugh.

Then you brought up Dick and Liz Cheney.
You start by claiming Dick Chaney is a war criminal.
Interpol has no outstanding arrest warrants for D. Cheney. Now I'm not about to defend many of D. Cheney's actions but I will point out the hypocrisy you are displaying.
D. Cheney is a "criminal", although never arrested or convicted in the U.S.; and that is bad. However Trump, who has been arrested, and convicted in the U.S. 35 times, with 34 felonies, is also a criminal..but that's okay.

D. Cheney did vote for Trump the first time, but at least he is capable of correcting past mistakes, unlike Trump.

Likewise I don't agree with many, if not most, of Liz's policies and views; but she is standing up to a tyrant at the cost of her political career and she has had to hire private security after receiving many death threats from Trump's violent backers....not to mention Trump himself:

That takes courage.

Liz Cheney is a true patriot, someone I can disagree with over policy, but agree with when it comes to law, order, and morals.

 

Yes, part of Kamala's loss was due to sexism. Just take a look at Trump's cabinet picks and Trump himself, a lot of misogynists there.

And I don't watch MSNBC, no cable or satellite.

 

Sure, fighting for the Constitution, law and order, the inclusion of all people and the freedom of those people to live their lives in peace without being told what religion to follow....

....by electing a man who wants to fight for the Constitution and law and order by the "termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution", who wants to include all people by deporting 20 million of them (about 17% of the entire country), promoting freedom of religion putting Christian bibles and only Christian bibles in every public school, and banning books they don't like.

Doublespeak (look it up.)​

 

Do you know how to read, are you 9 years old or maybe a Russian agent?

I ask because you either have a reading comprehension level below that of a 3rd grader as you have no comprehension of what you read...
Example: felony conviction = no felony conviction.
...or you deliberately promote false information and propaganda.