Corporation for Public Broadcasting shut down

Musta 'said a wrong word about DER FUHRER!! That's all it takes. Whomever does not worship the prick is an enemy and must be dealt with. I will miss PBS.

 

It's all part of Project 2025, which Trump claimed to know nothing about before the election.

 

Where will big Bird go? Or will Trump have it for lunch?

 

All of the Sock puppets will be immediately rounded up by ICE, and inspected for Chinese spy devices, before doing anything else. Big Bird, may become the first White House Thanksgiving Turkey to not be pardoned.

 

He knew...if if he wants everyone to believe he didn't. It was all planned out.
If you do a side by side comparison Project 2025 is a modern version of teh Enabling Act of 1933 that Gave Hitler power over Germany's lawmaking power

 

The one thing nobody ever credited with starting WWII was all the corruption. If a historian actually listed all the corruption in the world's leading economies, he would be burned alive at the stake and his work censored.

Its not a mistake that the most advanced countries in the world, keep declaring war on the entire world.

 

Woke Coffee!

Before I Found Real Coffee, I Had No Life!
Coffee Has Become My Woke Spirituality!
These Days I Worship At The Coffee Urn!
Living Life One Cup of Coffee At A Time!
Coffee, made me more compassionate!
Coffee Gave Me Back My Voice Again!
Coffee, Gave Me Back My Life Again.
Coffee, Managed To Open My Eyes!
Coffee, Inspired A Higher Purpose!
Coffee Gave Me True Perspective!
Coffee made me more productive.
Woke Coffee Has Repeatedly Saved My Sanity!
But Whatever You Do, Don't Drink The Cool-Aid!​

 

The problem is, modern science doesn't support PBS, they support Wall Street.

Donald Duck is now reminding them of the error of their evil ways.

 

Anyone who watched PBS back in the 70's and 80's will remember some great shows that were more progressive and inclusive than anything today. It's just that the center has moved and the terminology doesn't mean what it used to.

How many remember watching the Flintstones when it was normal to "Have a Gay Old Time." and no one's parents were triggered because the cartoon was trying to indoctrinate their child.

 

Testing their DNA is the most reliable way to determine how anyone votes, while Google has complained the younger generation have all the decision making capacity of chickens, making it harder for them to censor half of reality, and shoot for the lowest common denominator. Its a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad Toxic Corporate Sponsored Playground, and there is no center to fall apart. The fact they're going after even PBS is simply more proof there's nobody in charge around here, because they've all censored half of reality, including the democrats.

Blame your own teachers, who could not teach a child how to use a dictionary if their lives depended on it, and could not care less if a quarter of their students still claim the sun revolves around the earth.

 

DNA can’t predict how someone will vote in a specific election. There is NO Gene to determine Political Beliefs.

 

You have it backwards, genes make us either more or less assertive. Shyness, for example, was the first personality trait proven to be genetic. In other words, our genes ,make us more or less political, and determine who is conservative or liberal. Without genes, ya got nothing.

In this case, the research shows that people have no choice but to rely on their genes, because there are no real politics happening, they're already censoring half of reality, and whoever advertises the most is almost certain to win.

These days, if you wanna become president, you must have billionaires supporting you.

 

Just wondering how much of Public Broadcasting's budget was covered by Government largesse? Did they really need to close down ?
This was not unanticipated.

 

The Corporation For Public Broadcasting is a nonprofit corporation, and with their federal funding cut, they have no choice but to close their doors, and PBS has no choice but to reorganize as a for profit venture.

Its bizarre, because Disney is the only corporation that could begin to fill their shoes, and they're being attacked as well. Donald Duck would steal candy from every baby alive, all at the same time.

 

Okay Dumbledore ...
"DNA determines if you're conservative or liberal," like it's a new sorting hat for political parties.
Yes, genes can influence personality traits like openness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, etc., and there’s some research showing correlations between certain traits and political leanings. For example:

• People high in openness to experience are more likely to lean liberal.
  
  
• People high in conscientiousness are more likely to lean conservative.
  

But saying "genes determine your politics" is like saying "your height determines whether you're a basketball fan." There's just too much going on—life experience, upbringing, education, culture, trauma, and, oh yeah, your actual opinions.

Also, claiming that "without genes, ya got nothing" is about as deep as a bumper sticker that says “Gravity: It’s the Law.”

It's the kind of thing that sounds profound if you’ve just discovered pop science but completely falls apart under scrutiny.

 

I loved aspects of PBS. However, it's just not the case that PBS was non biased, especially when it came to social issues.

It was in large part media by and for social liberals.

 

In ten years of my surveying people, not a single person knew how to use a common dictionary, or was willing to admit they did, because its taboo in our culture. Once you comprehend that, according to their own standards, academia cannot teach a child how to use a dictionary if lives depended on it, and they're perfectly content that a quarter of their students insist the sun revolves around the earth. Richard Dawkins famously invented his own nonsense word, "meme", encouraging billions of atheists to babble complete nonsense for decades now.

So long as nobody is allowed to challenge academia's ability to teach, the entire population consists of Kindergarten drop-outs, and its debatable what even academia calls politics.