Our President!

Discussion in 'Politics' started by sm0key42o8, Apr 28, 2005.

  1. sm0key42o8

    sm0key42o8 Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,020
    Likes Received:
    26
    Mr Bush stated yesterday that this country needed to work on moving away from our dependency on fossil fuels. I am right on track with him on this. But he went from there to say that he was asking congress for a budget to look into the use of coal.


    Would anybody like to take a ride on my coal powered hover-bike?
     
  2. LickHERish

    LickHERish Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,009
    Likes Received:
    2
    Mr Presidunce ought to check his encyclopedia for the term "fossil fuels".

    Coal IS a fossil fuel, moron! And a highly polluting one at that as anyone living a soot stained European city to this day knows all too well.
     
  3. sm0key42o8

    sm0key42o8 Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,020
    Likes Received:
    26
    Yea, I am so glad the man in charge of my country is no smater than a middle school chap!
     
  4. LickHERish

    LickHERish Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,009
    Likes Received:
    2
    So are Cheney and the rest of the cabal actually running the nation away from the cameras. All the easier to hand the dunce his "talking points" and tell him to avoid deviating from the script once the cameras are turned on.
     
  5. sm0key42o8

    sm0key42o8 Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,020
    Likes Received:
    26
    Bush went on to say that the U.S. has not invested in a new nuclear power plant since 1979! Hummm, I wonder what happened that year to make us change our mind about nuclear power?

    On March 28, 1979 Reactor 2 at the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant suffered a partial meltdown.
     
  6. Orsino2

    Orsino2 Hip Forums Supporter HipForums Supporter

    Messages:
    41,058
    Likes Received:
    4
    Hahaha... I saw that on the daily show, too. I also read it in U.S. News. At this point, my head is going "I wonder if Dubya is having some fun fucking with us" :eek: Surely, he can't seriously think it's better.
     
  7. sm0key42o8

    sm0key42o8 Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,020
    Likes Received:
    26
    Yea, I love John Stewart. I serious doubt W is that stoopid! Atleast I hope not. Did anyone see the footage of him holding hands with that Saudi guy, they were talkin about the flowers too! Makes you wonder!
     
  8. Orsino2

    Orsino2 Hip Forums Supporter HipForums Supporter

    Messages:
    41,058
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ahaha... I know, Dubya scored highly on his SAT, but I wonder if all his partying days and cocaine binges went to his head.
     
  9. Soulless||Chaos

    Soulless||Chaos SelfInducedExistence

    Messages:
    19,814
    Likes Received:
    7
  10. sm0key42o8

    sm0key42o8 Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,020
    Likes Received:
    26
    Yea lets just nuke the globe while we are at it, because lets see nucleat waste does not break down. That means that it will always be wherever we dump it.
     
  11. matthew

    matthew Almost sexy

    Messages:
    9,292
    Likes Received:
    1
    Has any one bothered to read the proposals ?. As hilarious as all this is...i read a bit ..but you lot (americans) should know more , right ?.
     
  12. Soulless||Chaos

    Soulless||Chaos SelfInducedExistence

    Messages:
    19,814
    Likes Received:
    7
    Yes because I have such limited capacity as to not be able to differentiate between nuclear power plants and nuclear weapons. :rolleyes:

    If nuclear power is so bad, how then do you propose the energy problem be solved?
     
  13. element7

    element7 Random fool

    Messages:
    1,519
    Likes Received:
    0
    The deal is they're only going to look in the direction that will continue to fill their pockets. That's my take anyway because it fits the pattern. But as far as alternate energy Future Hi has a great section on it. Amazing stuff.

    http://www.futurehi.net/archives/cat_energy.html

    [​IMG]
     
  14. sm0key42o8

    sm0key42o8 Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,020
    Likes Received:
    26
    Lets see. We could look more into solar, hydroelectric, wind(cant remeber what that ones called) there are alot better options than nuclaer. And remember anytime there is a nuclaer reaction it creates nuclaer waste and that has no half-life!
     
  15. Soulless||Chaos

    Soulless||Chaos SelfInducedExistence

    Messages:
    19,814
    Likes Received:
    7
    Scalability... Wind and hydro lack it. Solar is innefficient. Nuclear waste does have a half life it's just quite long, but fortunately, it can be quite efficiently recycled.. Normal proccessing only uses about 5% of the potential energy, they can recycle it and continue to extract energy. :D
     
  16. Pressed_Rat

    Pressed_Rat Do you even lift, bruh?

    Messages:
    33,965
    Likes Received:
    2,508
    Bush does not want to curb fossil fuel consumption. Don't be so gullible, folks.
     
  17. sm0key42o8

    sm0key42o8 Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,020
    Likes Received:
    26
    Yea I know. What is his family business again?? Oh yea OIL!
     
  18. LickHERish

    LickHERish Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,009
    Likes Received:
    2
    Soulless, using the PNAC as a source for legitimate energy solutions is like asking the alligator for his skin to make a new pair of boots. Don't you realise these are same cabal who orchestrated the lies behind the aministration's "war that will not end in our lifetime". You think they care one whiff for anything that isnt directly tied to their big money interests?

    I can assure you that these people are a significant reason why there is no serious effort to invest in alternate energy infrastructure in America.
     
  19. sm0key42o8

    sm0key42o8 Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,020
    Likes Received:
    26
    YEa, what she said!!!
     
  20. Soulless||Chaos

    Soulless||Chaos SelfInducedExistence

    Messages:
    19,814
    Likes Received:
    7
    I wasn't using that as a source for solutions, just to show what they had in mind. :rolleyes: It really explains a lot if you bother to read what's on that site. :rolleyes:
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice