part of it looks like at the photo store that another photo was accidently imposed to another nagative. I know you said its digital though..weird
It is digital. And I know exactly what you were talking about. If I had taken this picture with a film camera I would think that same exact thought.
You are talking as though it is a settled matter that these kinds of things in photos actually are ghosts. That is far from indisputable. I personally do not believe such things. For one thing, why on earth would ghosts appear on film but not visibly to us? The camera records simply the same visible light that WE see. I don't know of any reason why the same visible light that causes the film to react would not cause our eyes to react, seeing the "ghosts" at the same time the camera sees them. Makes no sense. I do understand that some people like to believe that these things are ghosts. But I think it's wishful thinking. -Jeffrey
maybe you're right jeff or perhaps there is a possibility that there are some thing humanbeings do not understand?
You know what? Anyone who keeps insisting it's real it's real it's real to a bunch of people like us who have no way at all to verify what has or has not been done to the photos loses all credibility with me. I mean, you say we should be able to just look and somehow KNOW that this is a photo of "real ghosts"? Anyone worth believing would not be so insistent. They would seem to be far more objective. They'd say "check it out and see what you think." They wouldn't say, "You'll see that it's real." After all, there is no way at all for any of us to know -- except based on faith in your word -- that these photos have not been altered in any way. It would be foolish to just believe away. -Jeffrey
There is a huge difference between acknowledging that there is more in the universe than we human beings understand, and claiming that this is definitive proof of what else is out there beyond our understanding. Don't you see how overambitious it is to state unequivocally that "these are ghosts"? Anyone who is careful and scientific in their study of anything (and yes, study of the paranormal must be done scientifically for it to be worth anything) knows that you don't go off half-cocked. Only crackpots do -- credulous fools who will believe something before proof is truly established. Answers about the universe will never come from people like that. -Jeffrey
jeffery do you remember that stick you shoved up your ass for safe keeping? perhaps it is time you took it out. if you read my posts you'd know that I stated that I am going to remain undecided just because that is my opinion yet you have to try and bring this guy down and basicaly kill all the fun in everything... you are just another cancer on these forums. the only difference is I don't believe you are a bad person, just very stressed for lack of a better word. anyway lets just assume this guy (personface I believe) isn't lieing and he took the photo and it did genuinly come out the way it is with out him altering it. Sure it may or may not be a bunch of ghosts but it doesn't mean you have to be such a dick about the whole subject and write a short essay on why you think he is wrong...
maybe not exactly, but the colors and such would suggest something like that... wouldnt explain the faces though... im just a skeptic.
"For one thing, why on earth would ghosts appear on film but not visibly to us? The camera records simply the same visible light that WE see. I don't know of any reason why the same visible light that causes the film to react would not cause our eyes to react, seeing the "ghosts" at the same time the camera sees them. Makes no sense." It makes for a much better movie