I HATE BUSH.. HE IS AN EVIL EVIL MAN!! I CAN'T STAND HIM! just thought i would get that off my chest.
AMAZING! you just supplied all those reasons and everything! now im sure as hell gonna hate bush since you gave all that support for your claim. hahah im joking. pressed rat good to see you again
that's an intellgent.. or do you mean, "that's intellgent" speak for your self. i can list a million reason..... but i don't have the time.
Well, I'm sold. Thirty seconds ago I loved him, but how can I argue with a post like that? Fuck Bush. Peace
Wow you sure did come up with good reasons for hating Bush. Im impressed. You probably cant come up with a really good reason for hating him besides the fact that your a mindless liberal who believes anything thats said from another liberals mouth. Or that he started a war *gasp* Say no to war!!! Unless a Democrat is president...
The Worst President? Liberals claim President Bush shouldn't have started this war. They complain about his prosecution of it. They point out that Iraq didn't attack the U.S. and we shouldn't have went to war with them. One liberal recently claimed Bush was the worst president in U.S. history. Most of these claims come from liberals in the Democratic party. Being an Independent I decided to take a look at history and see if using that criteria who else could be called the "worst" president. FDR ( a democrat) led us into World War II against Germany, Italy, and Japan. Neither Germany or Italy ever attacked us: Japan did. From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost, an average of 112,500 per year. That's 1 Democratic President, 4 years and 450,000 American lives Harry Truman (a democrat) finished that war and started one in Korea, North Korea never attacked us. From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost, an average of 18,333 per year. That's 1 Democratic President, 3 years, and 55,000 American lives. John F. Kennedy (a democrat) started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never attacked us. Lyndon B. Johnson (a democrat) turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975, 58,000 lives were lost, an average of 5,800 per year. Finally in the 1970's Richard Nixon (a republican) pulled us out of Vietnam. That's 2 Democratic Presidents, 1 Republican President, 13 years, and 58,000 American lives. Bill Clinton went to war in Bosnia WITHOUT UN or French consent, Bosnia never attacked us. The Clinton administration was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three times by Sudan and did nothing. Osama has attacked us on multiple occasions. In the two years since terrorists attacked us, President Bush has liberated two countries, crushed the Taliban, crippled al-Qaida, put nuclear inspectors in Lybia, Iran and North Korea without firing a shot, and captured Sadaam Hussein, who slaughtered 300,000 of his own people. We lost about 600 soldiers, an average of 200 a year. Bush did all this abroad while not allowing another terrorist attack at home. That's 1 Republican President, 2 1/2 years, and about 600 American lives. Then the Democrats complained about how long the war on terror is taking, but... It took less time to take Iraq than it TOOK JANET RENO TO TAKE THE BRANCH DAVIDIAN C0MPOUND! THAT WAS A 51 DAY OPERATION! We've been looking for evidence of chemical weapons in Iraq for LESS TIME THAN IT TOOK HILLARY CLINTON TO LOCATE THE ROSE LAW FIRM RECORDS IN HER OWN OFFICE! It took less time for the 3rd Infantry Division and the Marines to destroy the Medina Republican Guard than it took TED KENNEDY TO CALL THE POLICE AND GIVE HIMSELF UP AFTER HE HAD AN ACCIDENT WHILE DRUNK AND SANK HIS OLDSMOBILE IN THE CHAPPAQUIDIK RIVER KILLING THE YOUNG LADY WHO WAS HIS PASSENGER! And Finally... IT TOOK LESS TIME FOR THE U.S. MILITARY TO TAKE IRAQ THAN IT DID TO COUNT THE VOTES IN FLORIDA IN 2000!!!!
Hey a good post from you for once. Reflecting on all the other posts you've made thus far, you should follow your own advice sometime.
Yes, Danip, perhaps you should take your own advice. You have a sour attitude, and a bad reflection of what some Republicans are...ASSHOLES. How do you expect to even remotely sway people (which Im glad you wont because you are such a BAD EXAMPLE) with a stick up your ass. I dislike Bush as well. He is evil. I feel inside of me, and it is quite obvious that he is liar. When I see his face on TV I know his true alterior motives.... BUSH IS A SELF RIGHTEOUS HYPOCRITE CON MAN!
I do not see why I should follow my own advice, I have never had the need to vent on here. You say Bush is a liar? Look at John Kerry, how many different stories does he have about his stupid war medals? And you say republicans are ass holes? Republicans have for quite some time been the more quiet party while Democrats have always been the ones who are out protesting and making a big deal about everything. Now all of a sudden the Republicans start being a little bit louder than they have in the past and all of a sudden were the ass holes? I think not.
Dude you've totally missed the point. Perhaps I should have been more specific... it's the "you should try thinking" part that you could make good use of. Your post aren't always devoid of thought, but they often have really underdeveloped, one-sentence arguments and are sometimes plain asinine. I'm really not trying to flame you, I try to avoid getting personal. Just saying, think more when you post, man.
what's wrong with being self-righteous, Butterfly? I generally think of myself as self-righteous, and besides do you think Bush is smart enough to be a conman?