No, its not. Turns out that the world tribune is owned by bush. Their actually in a partnership with weekly world news and the national enquire.
Come on West Point - get a clue. If even a portion of that information was valid you would have seen it platered all over CNN, - Bush, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz the whole warmongering gang would have been giving press conferences over the past five days saying, "see I told you so, I told you so" We you find valid and confirmed sources for news, by all means share them, but don't waste our time with BS like this.
no dhs the news is almost as liberal as you are why would they support a republican it would destroy the war democrats have waged on people who can think for themselves.
Have you ever watched Fox News, danip? Cockamamy. What in the name of all-that-may-be-holy are you talkin' about?
That's what I would like to know. Geez and to think in all my 28 years I've simply been brain washed by the democrat party into not thinking for myself.
Oh yes, definitely the source I should go to for my news - after all John Kerry owns the Associated Press doesn't he? Its a key component to the Democrats war on people thinking freely.
west point, if that was a compiment i thank you however, if it was a fucking insult...i have all the facts i need. i look at every stand point from an objective eye. i have looked at most news articles, all the political filth spewed forth and the inconsistances. i have come to one conclusion. bush is evil as are all his staff plain and simple.
Why isn't this all over the news? Because we never actually held these WMD's in our hands. I can guarentee you that once we posses all of these WMD's, have them fully traced back to Iraq and saddam, and of course the U.N. says "yup we found um" you will get your CNN headlines.
i just wanna know who now has all the wmd's that saddam had. where'd they go? we know he had them because we gave them to him. who has them now, or where are they buried?
As Scott Ritter said from the start, they were destroyed. Arm chair pundits can cling to whatever vain hope they wish to justify their ideological bent, but insofar as Scott himself headed up the inspections for several years, his assessments carry much greater legitimacy. Sooner or later the ideologues will either have to wake up and acknowledge that unilateral warmongering (as some self styled global authority) is the very posture we once condemned our Cold War opponents of adopting, or else they will be sidelined (and none too soon) as the fence riders increasingly decide to assume their civil responsibility and help us restore some rationale and adherence to "the rule of law" to our governance. We could demonstrate that committment to international law by making the ratification of the ICC a top priority and offer up the architects of the PNAC for War Crimes trial as our first examples.
kay, then this would have been all over fox news. but wait... fox news helped COMMUNIST china launch it's official propaganda website... so maybe they are in the hands of the dark progressive cabal bwahahahaha....
