Embryonic Stemcell Research -What's Wrong With It?

Discussion in 'Science and Technology' started by forest_pixie84, Apr 12, 2005.

  1. forest_pixie84

    forest_pixie84 Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,325
    Likes Received:
    1
    I heard on the radio yesterday some people arguing against embryonic stemcell research because it's "killing potential human life forms". People say that if it were not for the research the potential unborn person may have done great things. This does not make logical sense, seeing as how the mind (as far as we are allowed know) ONLY stores and conditions only after it's had experiences. AND If an unborn person has the potential to do great things, it is also the potential to be like Hitler.

    Maybe people who disagree think that Hitler was evil in the womb, or Gandi was born wise. For the Jesus believers, even in the bible Jesus wasn't born doing great things.
     
  2. StarFaerie

    StarFaerie Member

    Messages:
    267
    Likes Received:
    1
    Well, I always thought they were using the cells of the already aborted or miscarried fetus...perhaps someone with some knowledge of this can clear that aspect up for us?

    If it's just using the fetuses who are already not going to be born I don't understand what the problem is either, but I also am pretty ignorant on the subject..I mean do they have to keep the fetuses alive for this research? Cause that seems inhumane...but if it's just an issue of using cells that would be wasted otherwise I don't see the problem
     
  3. matthew

    matthew Almost sexy

    Messages:
    9,292
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think its the concept of 'aborted' babies being used 'life' being used

    I am sure some one will break it down a lot better than my 'cut and paste'..fundementaly i think your right.
    It is the ugly side of religeon (that has a problem with it) imho.

    I don't see the problem..
     
  4. turtlefriend

    turtlefriend Member

    Messages:
    546
    Likes Received:
    5
    Most of the babies used are discarded fetuses from invitro (sp?) fertilization, where they fertilize several eggs, and after the mother has had all the kids she wants, the rest are discarded and possibly used for reaserch. I go to a Catholic school where they're also against invitro, and I think the reserch is part of the reason why they're against it. (even though if the fetuses won't be used for ssr, the majority of them will just be thrown out)

    I personally am against abortion after the first month because after that month, the fetus has all the rutimentary nerve endings in place and can potentially feel the pain of being aborted. But these fetuses being reaserched on are smaller than that, they're just specks in a petree dish - and the reaserch on them can provide cures for so many things, from Altzheimer's to paralysis. The potential for these fetus to improve the quality if life for so many people is just to good to pass up.
     
  5. matthew

    matthew Almost sexy

    Messages:
    9,292
    Likes Received:
    0
  6. because most fundy christians have no idea why the fuck their protesting something , they just are, they blindly listen to some hate spewing fuck in a pulpit with 3 months in a seminary and a skim through the gospel books

    And that is why people are against it, I had an entire thing worked out going through the fundy "logic" and the logic shootin' it down but it just got convoluted
     
  7. matthew

    matthew Almost sexy

    Messages:
    9,292
    Likes Received:
    0
    Fundemental christians are following christianity .. christianity fundementaly can't be that wise...thats why religeon is fundementaly bollocks (pardon my french).
     
  8. robostiltzkin

    robostiltzkin Member

    Messages:
    251
    Likes Received:
    1
    There is nothing wrong with it. For many, it is another "pro-life" cause. Regardless, these embryonic cells would either be used for research, or thrown away. Which is better? Tough choice... not at all. While the research component is very important, and should not be limited, it has been demonstrated that stem cells from the individual (eg marrow, umbilical cells, etc) is more effective in therapeutic uses. The research must continue, though. If the US doesn't do it, someone else will.
     
  9. RoBoWaLkEr

    RoBoWaLkEr Member

    Messages:
    983
    Likes Received:
    0
    I personally don't see anything wrong with it...especially when you look at all the potential benefits that it has to offer! Those who would say otherwise though would have you think something along the lines of mothers being forced to abort their babies for the sake of research, or something else on that level. As someone else said, most of the fetuses used are ones that would more or less be thrown away anyway. That's just my 2 cents tho.
     
  10. StarFaerie

    StarFaerie Member

    Messages:
    267
    Likes Received:
    1
    Originally Posted by Quest_techie
    ""because most fundy christians have no idea why the fuck their protesting something , they just are, they blindly listen to some hate spewing fuck in a pulpit with 3 months in a seminary and a skim through the gospel books
    And that is why people are against it, I had an entire thing worked out going through the fundy "logic" and the logic shootin' it down but it just got convoluted"

    Fundemental christians are following christianity .. christianity fundementaly can't be that wise...thats why religeon is fundementaly bollocks (pardon my french)."

    I agree with you...but let's face it, any group has that aspect of it...I've been getting emails about protesting them driling for oil in the artic...well I don't see a problem with it, we have to get oil somewhere and nobody has been able to tell me what animals are in danger...so I'm assuming there aren't even any animals in danger...so why the hell would I protest that? You know? Any time you proetst anything just because *your group* is protesting it then that's when yopu have ridiculous stuff that makes everyone lose respect for you...

    Allright I'm done preaching lol...it looks like they are just researching on cells that would be thrown away...so my opinion would be it would be stupid not to research
     
  11. matthew

    matthew Almost sexy

    Messages:
    9,292
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  12. Actually most fundys I've encountered don't know shit about their religion, and when approached with the idea that *gasp* god might use metaphors so that an old hebrew\ egyptian guy could understand the creation of the universe (much like jesus used parables {metaphors} to explain to people how being nice to people worked {oversimplification, I don't care right now, you get the point}) They piss themselves

    1:10 christians have actually read the bible through, and that is according to a survey taken by a church, most of them probably lied too, I'd bet it's closer to 1:30 (1:100 in the U.S.) so really how many of these ignorant sons of bitches preaching ignorantly about "their own religion" (which they don't even really practice for the most part it's vastly an excuse to exclude others) have actually thrown people away from god, far far away.

    Shit if the baby isn't going to happen and wasn't meant to happen (and he isn't meant to happen if he didn't) why waste the cells, that's fucking stupid


    on the same thread what is w\ catholics god is all powerful but you can't wear a condom just in case god can't break it to let a baby get born that he wants? thats ignorance of ones own religion and it's disgusting
     
  13. StarFaerie

    StarFaerie Member

    Messages:
    267
    Likes Received:
    1
    "1:10 christians have actually read the bible through, and that is according to a survey taken by a church, most of them probably lied too, I'd bet it's closer to 1:30 (1:100 in the U.S.) so really how many of these ignorant sons of bitches preaching ignorantly about "their own religion" (which they don't even really practice for the most part it's vastly an excuse to exclude others) have actually thrown people away from god, far far away."


    LOL!!! whenever I finally read the Bible through I couldn't stomach the thought of being Christian anymore...just thought that was funny you should say that...if they were forced to read what they're perpetuating I think of lot of them would be shocked and appalled...not all though
     
  14. matthew

    matthew Almost sexy

    Messages:
    9,292
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree fully with what you both have said.. :) .
     
  15. HuckFinn

    HuckFinn Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,752
    Likes Received:
    1
  16. shaggie

    shaggie Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,504
    Likes Received:
    19
    Millions of embryos have been destroyed in the name of in vitro fertilization by fertility companies. No one is complaining about that. Yet when a few are used for scientific purposes, people are upset.

    I posted this article a while back in another room:

    http://www.accessexcellence.org/WN/SU/parthenogenesis.html

    .
     
  17. Raelian1

    Raelian1 Member

    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    0
    A fetus is not a living person. There is nothing wrong with using fetuses in stem cell research. In fact, this research can potentially cure a lot of diseases. Conservative groups are against this research because they think that fetuses have souls. There is no such thing as a soul. The Catholic Church is the worst offender. They are against all medical research (that's why I was surprise to see Pope John Paul II getting the latest medical treatment. Gee, wouldn't you think that the imaginery God would "faith heal" him). Going back to stem cells, this research is so important that people from the Raelian Movement (that I belong to) created a company that started a project called stemaid (all in the stemaid.org website).
     
  18. Rowan

    Rowan Hip Forums Supporter HipForums Supporter

    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    0
    Another important thing to consider is many of the current stem cell lines are derived from cancerous tissues, such as the famous and oft used HELA cells from Herieta Lack's cervical cancer cells (yay I KNEW i'd use what I learned in cellbio one day!), and are genetically different from "normal" totipotent cells. If your using stem cells to study treatments for cancer, it would be useful to have both cancer cell lines and "normal". Also, as a cell line gets older it degenerates and builds up mutations further deviating from "fresh normal" stem cells.

    Also, as soon as I read the bible (like 6 years ago) christianity has seemed totally wrong for me. Check out annotatedbible.com (I think thats the address) its great!


    Rowan
     
  19. Kandahar

    Kandahar Banned

    Messages:
    1,512
    Likes Received:
    0
    The embryos used in stem-cell research are already dead and frozen. Why would you want to adopt a frozen test tube filled with lifeless goo, instead of letting someone use it who actually might derive some benefit from it?
     
  20. Mononucleosis

    Mononucleosis Member

    Messages:
    316
    Likes Received:
    1
    Those aren't talking about the stem cells taking from dead and frozen embryos. In Vitro fetilization has the egg and sperm taken and mixed and implanted... not adopted from the dead embryos...
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice