False Flag Over London

http://www.onlinejournal.com/Commentary/070805Leonard/070805leonard.html


False flag over London

By John Leonard
Online Journal Contributing Writer


July 8, 2005—Yesterday we saw a classic false flag attack in London, organized by western secret services to distract attention from the deepening political troubles of Bush and Blair, and perhaps even to create the pretext for war on Iran. Of course, Bush and his poll ratings have been sinking under scandals and rumblings of impeachment. Blair too has been badly hurt by the Downing Street memo.

For giving the lowdown on the London underground, I was roundly rebuked today, accused of disgracing the dead. Yet I was the one speaking out to avenge their honor, defending their memory from the bloodstain of abuse by the vultures of war. But no, the shocked sheeple flocked to march in ever tighter lockstep for their Vaterland, with each new Reichstag Firemeisterwerk casting a stronger spell. . . .

The G-8 conference was an ideal, high-profile venue to mobilize the sympathy of world leaders behind their flagging amateur B&B show. Today's Guy Fawkeses, home-team self-terrorists in the heart of empire, thumbed their noses at mortal fools while they played their favorite base-eleven numerology game, on this 7/7 date—following on Madrid 3/11 and New York 9/11, with its Flights 11 and 77.

Cui bono. Wall Street closed on an uptick.

So how can I be so sure? The war-profiteer clique are not all that inventive. False terror is the only trick they know. If they had any idea of governance or statecraft, they wouldn't need to stoop to these toxic tactics.

One of the classic trademarks of false flag terror was on display yesterday: the "previously unknown" organization posting anonymously on a website. Of course, western intelligence, using Echelon and such tools, could track any web posting back to its source. If it wanted to.

"Real" terrorists are known groups that make concrete demands. They are an endangered species, if not extinct.

Fake terrorists—covert psy-war units of western intelligence—always invent a name of an "unknown" group. They have to do this, of course. If they claimed, say, that the PLO did it, the accused would energetically deny it, spoiling the show. So they use fictitious identities, which they can mold to suit the target of convenience.

Yesterday's fiction was a "secret" group affiliated—oh how wonderfully convenient—with Al Qaeda and Al Zarqawi. Yet the state-owned BBC itself has established that Al Qaeda does not even exist, in its documentary film, "The Terror Myth." And just this week Dahr Jamail wrote of his trip to the town of Zarqa, on the trail of the fabled Zarqawi. The man's family believe he died years ago—no recent photos exist. Certain is only that the mythical Zarqawi's base of operations always pops up wherever the Americans want to attack—Fallujah, Samarra, where do you want to go tomorrow?

Some other dead giveaway signs:

*Scotland Yard warned Israeli Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu half an hour beforehand not to go to the bomb site, according to an AP wire from Jerusalem (a slip that was subsequently denied of course, but it was still up at Al Jazeera).

*An MSNBC translator says an error in a verse from the Quran in a statement by the "unknown" group couldn't have been made by Al Qaeda, and he thinks it's phony. Blair's proofreaders are falling down on their dossiers again . . . they ought to be belted or suspended.

*Train bombings like London 7/7and Madrid 3/11 are a speciality of NATO psy-war units. The expert on this since 1978 has been Webster Tarpley, who shows in his latest book, 9/11 Synthetic Terror, how the bombing of Bologna Stazione Centrale in 1980 by the so-called Red Brigades is of one cloth with the Madrid bombings. The supposed "communist terrorist" Red Brigades were phonies, a patsy outfit created by Lodge P2, the neofascist shadow government with Italy in its grip. The Madrid train bombing suspects were police agents, also run by a neo-fascist falange: as Tarpley notes, one suspect admitted he worked for the old guard, the Guardia Civil, Unidad Central Operativa.​

*Another possible motive, says Tarpley, is that the war party want to push Bush into Iran, but America has no stomach for it. They need another 9/11 so they can occupy both the Iraqi and Iranian oil fields, and hold the world, all of us, to ransom.

War and rumors of war—reports of covert American commando operations against targets inside Iran have prepared the ground for war. A storm of anti-American sentiment was aroused, sweeping the elections against the reformers in favor of radical dark horse candidate Mahmoud Ahmadinejad—in turn paving the way to mobilize a war coalition against Iran. Failing that, he may replace Saddam as symbol of vilification while keeping Iran shackled by backward fundamentalism.

Tarpley's book has a chapter named "Islamic Fundamentalism: Fostered by U. S. Foreign Policy." It's a policy going back to the 19th century British Arab Bureau, crown purveyors of divide and conquer tactics, who hit on xenophobic fundamentalism as the tool to make the Arabs impossible partners for alliances with any of Britain's rivals.

"Poster boy" Osama bin Laden is only the latest product of this policy. Alternative writers in the West are quick to point out the demagogic effect his image has on Western publics. Few of them realize the deeply cynical obverse of the covert strategy: feeding the Arabs on the poison pills of false hopes in a terrorist hero.

Yet Arab admiration for Osama has remained platonic. Anthropologists long ago noted the Arab tendency to vent feelings in words rather than actions. Many Muslims felt bound to fight in Afghanistan against the atheist Soviet occupier, but the BBC's Terror Myth documentary recounts how bin Laden and Zawahiri utterly failed to mobilize real Arabs to the way of terrorism against innocent citizens. Tarpley adduces evidence that Zawahiri is probably bin Laden's handler from MI-6. Enter now the shadowy world of the alphabet agencies and their covert clients, the patsies and moles, who live a tunnel life, like the trains of London they have fed on this time.

O lovers of peace and opponents of war: never shall you see an end of calamities instigated by the war party, until the people see through the false flag trick. It is not in marching that wars are stopped, but by understanding.

We are working to bring out a new book that gives depth of historical background to this picture: The Nazi Hydra in America, currently online. It shows how the 1933 Reichstag fire, that most infamous false flag operation which catapulted the Bush-Harriman protégé, little Adolf Hitler, to power, was followed in 1934 by an attempted military putsch against FDR, launched by the Morgan interests—an episode that has been expunged from all schoolbooks. Yet if it had succeeded, with America and Germany both under Nazi control, the New World Fascist Order would have come into being 70 years ago.

They do not give up. They have time, money, and no project more captivating. They've been preparing the final putsch for at least a century, if not more.

Nor were they defeated in 1945. The postwar CIA and NSA are a Phoenix created from the ashes of Nazi assets. The enemy is within the gates.

Read, understand, and realize how bitter and lasting is the struggle against the corporatist hydra, which now lets show the true features behind that leering smiley face, as it grasps again for absolute world power.

John Leonard is the publisher of Webster Griffin Tarpley's "9/11 Synthetic Terror." It may be purchased from his website, Progressive Press. He also was editor and co-author of The War on Freedom (2002), the first exposé of 9/11 published in the United States.

 

You ever thought about this though : What if all the pressure gets to this admin and they give in to what the people want. They then orchestrate some major attack on american civilians only confirming their "we told you so" attitude and even stricter laws are enforced as a result. Bastards trapped us in man. Sorry.

 

That is in horribly bad taste. You might find it funny - hell, I even find it a bit funny - but a lot of people will be offended by that sort of joke so soon after the attacks.

 

have you considered that islamic supporters of this attack might be writing or paying people to write all these nutty conspiracy theorys .
whose interests do these conspiracy theorys serve?

 

That the majority are yet sneering at critical examinations of the glaring falsehoods (and the roster of such is long indeed) proffered by our Anglo-American leaders from 911 onwards is testament to those who are "benefitting". More to the case is the demonstrable multi-billion dollar winfalls accruing to the array of industry "solutions" springing up to fuel the continuance of this "WoT" and the concurrent institution of increasingly intrusive and repressive measures over our own populaces here at home.

No, if anything is a conspiracy theory of ridiculous magnitude it is the "official" sanitised groupthink propaganda advanced by our exposed lying leaders and reinforced daily by their media mouthpieces.

 

and what you need to do is notice that after every attack you have this same thing

the west did it
its not muslims
it has nothing to do with islam
islam means peace

all around the world there are these attacks being carried out by western intelligence to be made to look like islamic attacks, and western intelligence is never caught .

somehow they have this stream of people who appear to be islamic willing to blow themselves up to discredit Islam and aid western imperialism ....how do they do this .

how do they get all these agents who support these attacks and live deep cover lives as islamic clerics

 

how were they able to change the koran and haddith to support such attacks, you have a jihadi literature that goes back 1400 years how did western intelligence do that

if you go to the middle east you will see placards with pictures of recent suicide bombers thousands of people carrying pictures of them, how does western intelligence do that .

I live in the uk and when I went to the peace marches before the iraq war I saw thousands of people carrying placards supporting groups carrying out suicide bombing .

and little children with headscarfs with al-asqa martyes brigade , or hamas on them . I saw that with my own eyes these are " british " muslims .
I posted about it on this site and on stop the war sites ,how did western intelligence do this

 

Where were the bodies of these supposed "islamics willing to blow themselves up" on 911? Oh right, no remains to be verified and all site evidence duly denied forensic investigation and shipped out of the country against all principles and rules of evidentiary handling following a crime.

Again, no "arabs willing to blow themselves up" to be found involved with Madrid or the recent London bombings as they were planted devices. Our intelligence establishments/MIC are incapable of planting bombs, is it?

No Johnny, what we've had from the start was "claims" and "assertions" that it was this "Al Qaeda" network (steadily inflated from ragtag elements in Afghani caves to todays groupthink acceptance of a massive interlinked network of handy "never before heard of splinter cells" every time a new act is perpetrated). The whole facade comes complete with readymade website admissions by the "never before heard of splinter cell" written in Arabic (often with rather dubious references when scrutinised however) claiming responsibility and praising "Al Qaeda".

Where are these "masterminds" whose names get trotted out like a gradeschool roll call by the established media pundits and non-investigatory mouthpieces who call themselves "jounralists" these days? If they are such masterminds they are incredibly stupid and illogical to attack when public sentiment against our leaders always seems to hit new lows, giving our leaders renewed political capital.

The whole thing doesn't stack up once you step away from the mainstream dissent deadening littany of "offical" (officially paid more rightly) "experts" and start to examine the thread connecting all this back to the paradigm forming event of 911 itself.

Its all public perception management, friend. And as for histories of the use of "terrorism" as propaganda and population control, youll find that its roots of use by own governments on their own people, especially here in Europe goes back centuries.

All this "WoT" has actually ever produced is the oft repeated pointed finger at fundamentalist perpetrators of unknown national origins, a threat so transparently fabricated for perpetual exploitation for more decades to come than its preceding "Cold War" mythmaking managed.

 

If putting things in "quotes" somehow discredited them, your post would have a rock solid argument. Unfortunately it doesn't, and so saying that "terrorists" "bombed" "london" is really just boilerplate angry ranting.

"You" are "getting" boring with "your" angry "tirades" against everyone who "defies" your "moronic" conspiracy theory "herd instinct".

 

as far as I know they are still working on the london bombing so we dont know if they will find the body of the man on the bus ,and I believe the spanish found the madrid bombers and they blew themselves up may be wrong on that .

anyway

in london we have at present a man called omar bakri last year he was recruiting people to take part in suicide bombing attacks, he is still walking about a free man if you come to london I would imagine you would be able to see him .

Ive seen film made by two british suicide bombers before they killed themselves and several people in Isreal .

This recent attack in london didnt come at a low point for tony blair he has won a election and most likely wont stand again ,and we had just won the job of hosting the 2012 olmypic games .

I would agree with you that the goverment seem to blame everything on al-queda but I think that is because they dont want to address that support for these type of attacks is much wider and mainstream than they want to say, has its basis it islamic theology, and that they dont have a clue what they are doing .

you dont need to belong to a large group to be active in terrorism you have jihadi writers like the late sayyed qutb being read by quite a diverse selection of muslims cutting across sects .

and you have new methods being copied across groups ,so Im not suprised if there are all these little splinter groups poping up.

al-queda are pretty popular in fundi circles when they want to show how dangerous they are even with sects that wouldnt generally agree with ben laden, so thats the reason they would all qoute him.

The mispelled quran qoutes if they are there could be done by accident or could be done to feed the disinformation conspiracy nuts that islamists see as their allies .

I would think if our intelligence is that clever they would be able to qoute the quran correctly

 

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/londonnews/articles/10329634?version=1

its from back last year but gives you a idea of the mindset, Ive been debating muslims for years way way before sept 11 so I suppose I see this differently from you.

when I posted back last year that omar bakri was training suicide bombers some as young as ten in the uk, I got the same well its just a con by our government crap .

people said look they arrest all these people but no convictions,so the threat is all made up, well you have no convictions because they dont break or inform on each other much .

if you want to blow yourself up you have real commitment

bakri had open meetings with hundreds of people present I just dont believe they are all working for mossad or the cia

omar bakri http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2005/105/22.0.html

 

http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-13386011,00.html

discribed as being very nice boys and good muslims they chatted on cctv cameras before the attack while wearing military style rucksacks

http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-13385127,00.html

 

If that's what you want to believe, so be it. Frankly, I don't buy it for one minute. The government and corporate media can make up anything and put the blame on whatever patsies they so choose, and most people will believe it without question. I have been studying state-sponsored terrorism in depth for the past year and a half, and I know that the British government - not al-Qaeda - most stands to gain from such an attack.

And the fact that government officials were carrying out a drill at the exact same place, at the exact same time, involving the exact same scenario, more than proves who was really responsible for the attacks.

 

what does the british government have to gain, blair doesnt care about being re-elected, he was popular before the attack you had the feel good factor with winning the 2012 games .

now hes being blamed for letting the attacks happen, the only people who may gain are islamists and neo-nazis .

The islamists because they want to make muslims more radical, and they like killing kafirs and the neo-nazis because they can say told you so and they may get more support.

 

First of all, Tony Blair, like George Bush, is just a puppet. Both answer to much higher powers. So the idea of it benefiting Blair isn't even an issue to me. It's not intended to benefit Blair, but the high-level globalists that Blair answers to, who use terrorism to bolster support for further military action in the Middle East and the centralization of power. Blair is simply a figurehead for these elitists, who are the ones really controlling things from behind the scenes.

Certainly Blair has blood on his hands, but to think he called for the attacks and orchestrated them himself would be naive. I am sure he had foreknowledge of the attacks, which makes him complicit in the attacks, but I do not believe he orchestrated the attacks himself. His globalist handlers did.

I am not saying the British government did this, persay, rather elements within the government. Most of the people in government are good people, who have no idea what really goes on much higher up on the pyramid. People need to understand that there are rogue elements within every intelligence agency, whether it's the CIA, MI6 or Mossad, that literally operate above the government and above the law, who are working directly for the power/global-elite, to carry out their agenda.

 

power/global-elite, so you think there are this small bunch of whatever you like to think of them as knights templers, jews, spacemen, who control the world .

and all these other agendas like the islamist agenda dont really exist they are just mirages .

I suppose its a reassuring outlook find the naughty jews or the knights templer or the wicked spacemen and you will solve all the worlds problems .

but I dont buy it I think there are all these different groups and no one knows what they are doing, they all have agendas.

I dont think that anybody outside Islam needs to arrange bombings to make muslims look bad they do a good enough job of that by themselves

 

we now have nobody really knows, but about 1.6 million muslims in the uk.

I remember being in a protest against salman rushdie (I wasnt part of the protest I supported rushdie ) about 20 years ago

and I have never felt more hatred in my entire life, hatred not just directed at rushdie but at the west on general .

These demonstrations had 30,000 + people and in the years since then things have got worse and people have got more radical .

I have never seen a demonstration of 30,000 muslims against islamic terrorism not even 300 , you dont see that happening now .

all you see is groups linked or set up by terrorist groups saying they condemn the attack much like arafat used to say he condemned suicide bombing in english and praising them in arabic .

what you do see is muslims being keen to paint themselves as victims telling you that it has nothing to do with them or with islam, they really like you conspiracy nuts .

The media wont look at the real issues because the real issues scare them .

I live in the uk and I really dont think you would need to create a threat

 

Jonny2mad,

Didn't you know that Islamic fundies don't really exist? Osama doesn't really exist. The Middle East isn't what our evil media tells us it is. Women there have equal rights to men and there is no childslave-trade. Saddam Hussein was an actor hired by the US government to torture the Iraqis so that the US had an excuse to invade. The Middle East and all the Muslims are just peaceful innocents who want to spread joy,warmth,and equality all over the globe.

Surely they wouldn't actually butcher children to further their own personal agendas.

Only the evil white people in the US are capable of that behavior.

 

I am well aware that there are people in the Middle East who don't like us, and would like to cause us harm. But I also look beyond all the reactionary, overtly emotional BS. I ask myself real questions like:

1) If they truly hate us, why?

2) Who helped fund al-Qaeda and the Taliban?

3) Who funded Saddam and sold him biological agents?

4) Who sold Iran two of their nuclear reactors?

5) Who treated Osama bin Laden in the summer of 2001, and where?

6) If al-Qaeda really attacked America on September 11th, 2001, did they also tell NORAD to stand-down, while three out of four inexperienced terrorist-pilots flew literally hundreds of miles -- for over an hour, and by sight alone -- to locate the World Trade Center and Pentagon, and crash perfectly into all three targets (something inexperienced pilots have said even they couldn't pull off)?

7) Did al-Qaeda bring WTC-7 down only hours after the attacks on 9/11, despite the fact that no plane had hit it, and it was unofficially admitted by its leaseholder, Larry Silverstein, that the building was "pulled" (referring to a controlled demolition)? If the building's collapse really was the product of a controlled demolition, when did al-Qaeda access the building, without being detected, to rig it with explosives so that it would fall perfectly to the ground, destroying any evidence that might have been inside?

8) Which country was behind Operation Northwoods; a declassified government document from 1962, highlighting various scenarios for launching attacks on America and its people, to be used to blame the Cubans as a pretext for war?

9) Who most stands to gain from terrorism: the terrorists, or the government of the country that was attacked?

10) Why have attempts to capture Osama bin Laden by government officials been thwarted by higher-ups?

I look foreward to your answers/ideas.

 

The old german army would had stuck all this dirty camel drivers in the oven. in 60 days would could fill the Mercedes Benz with cheap Petrol.