U.S. Government Class A IP address used by Alneda

Proof the U.S. Government and Al Qaeda are the same.

http://www.ksee.blogspot.com/

Hostname for 65.89.91.148
IP address 65.89.91.148
Hostname www.alneda.com

The new alneda website is using a Class A IP address found between

UUNet Technologies, Inc.
63.0.0.0 - 63.127.255.255

and

Comcast IP Services, L.L.C.
73.0.0.0 - 73.191.255.255

The address ranges between these two government contracted agencies are top secret and are not listed.

About Alneda: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alneda

The new SECRET Alneda site is much more difficult to hack because it is on a new government IP address.

http://www.bushnews.com/attack.htm

The international Islamic media center
Global Islamic Media Centre

- posted by casey @ 7:57 AM

يرفع ... لتكون غصة في حلق أفعاني ومن معه
وأيضآ

يرفع ثانيه
حتي تخرج الجرزان من جحورها ويكتمل العدد
وبعد ذلك ياتي الذبح
the butchery will come

قائدهم .. الشيخ أسامة يحفظه الله .. يأمرهم .. أربع .. أربع .. !
the leader, sheikh osama god praise him he commands them 4 4

وخلايا " قاعدته " ينفذون أوامره .. أربع .. أربع .. !
and the operatives of his cells, obey him , 4 4

أربعا في الجو .. !
4 in the skies

وأربعا في البر .. !
4 on land

وأربعا في البحر .. !
and 4 in the sea

فجروها في أمريكا .. " جواً " .. أربع .. أربع .. !
it exploded in america in the air 4 4

وفجروها في الرياض " أرضاً " .. أربع .. أربع .. !
it exploded in riyadh on land 4 4

وفجروها في المغرب أرضاً " .. أربع .. أربع .. !
and it exploded on land in morroco 4 4

وأن شاء الله في القريب ...عشره عشره في اليمن
and god willing 10 10 in yemen

وأن شاء الله في القريب ...عشرون ...عشرون في مصر
and god willing 20 20 in egypt

والقادم بإذن الله " بحراً " .. أربع .. أربع .. !
and the next will be via sea 4 4

يفجرونها .. مكبرين " الله أكبر " أربع .. أربع .. !
they make it explode and say 'allahu akbar' 4 4

والقاصمة قريبا في أمريكا .. أربع .. أربع .. !
and soon in america 4 4

وها أنا اليوم أبتسم .. أربع .. أربع !
today I smile 4 4

وغدا سوف أضحك لنصر المؤمنين بإذن الله .. أربع .. أربع .. !
and tommorow I will laugh to the triumph of beleivers 4 4

فلله الحمد والمنة .. أربع .. أربع .. !
thank god 4 4

إنني أبتسم .. سبحانك ربي الأعلى ..
I smile, god is great

العدو يضرب من علو .. وأنت الأعلى .. سبحانك ربي الأعلى ..
the enemy hits from high above, but you[god] are higher, god is great

إنني أنتظر نصرك العظيم .. سبحانك ربي العظيم ..
I await your great victory, god is great

سالتني في حمانا ظبية 000 اتحب الشوق في عيني صبية

قلت لااعشق حسنا ظهرا 000 او ارى الحب عيونا نرجسية

انما اعشق صدرا عامرا 000 يحمل الموت ويزهو بالمنية

ادركت سري وقالت ظبيتي 000 انته لاتعشق غير البندقية

يرفع لتخرج كل الفئران والجرذان

الضربة الاولى كانت اربع 00 اربع
the first strike was 4 00 4
الضربة الثانية كانت اربع 00 اربع
the second strike was 4 00 4
الضربات القادمة ان شاء القوي الحليم ستكون اربع 00 اربع
the next strikes will be 4 00 4

والقاسمة ستكون ان شاء الله اربع 00 اربع

فقولوا معي
الله اكبر الله اكبر الله اكبر الله اكبر لااله الا الله
god is great
الله اكبر الله اكبر الله اكبر الله اكبر صدق وعده ونصر جنده وهزم الاحزاب وحده


__________________


- posted by casey @ 7:04 AM

65.89.91.148

 

Weren't you banned?
I don't know much about it, but something tells me random-nonsense-posts like these were the cause.

 

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/F74386DB-3B23-49E4-B70A-04A02D513538.htm

US censured over internet control

Saturday 02 July 2005, 16:24 Makka Time, 13:24 GMT

A decision by the US to retain oversight of the computers that control internet traffic has drawn harsh criticism about the lack of independence it could mean for the free-flowing, anything-goes communication network.

John Strand, a Copenhagen-based technology consultant said on Friday: "This seems like an extension of American security in the aftermath of 9/11."

"People will ask: 'Do the Americans want to control the internet?'"

The United States announced the move on Thursday, publishing a four-paragraph statement online, saying it would retain - indefinitely - oversight of the computers that control traffic on the internet, instead of gradually releasing control to an international body, as some countries have favoured.

That ran counter to previous US policy, although Michael Gallagher, assistant secretary for communications and information at the Commerce Department, said it was "the foundation of US policy going forward".

He said the declaration was a response to growing security threats and increased reliance on the internet globally for communications and commerce.

That has done little to allay fears that the United States is overstepping its boundaries and locking its grip on the internet - which is used for everything from selling second-hand shoes to criticising governments including authoritarian dictatorships.

Confrontational US move

Patrik Linden, a spokesman for the Swedish Internet infrastructure foundation, which runs and develops the Swedish top level domain .se, said the US announcement was "rather confrontational" towards those who would like to see an international body take control of the internet root servers.

"This kind of statement doesn't exactly favour that discussion," Linden said, adding that the announcement "wasn't completely unexpected".

"This is perhaps what a lot of people have thought that [the US] has always intended," he said.

The US does not have direct control of the internet.

Instead, it controls the administration of 13 computers - known as root servers.

The root servers tell web browsers such as Firefox or Internet Explorer and email programmes how to direct internet traffic.

Though located in private hands around the world, they contain government-approved lists of the 260 or so internet suffixes, such as .com, .net and country designators such as .fr for France or .no for Norway.

Patrik Faltstrom, one of Sweden's foremost experts on IP technology and a liaison for both the Internet Engineering Task Force and Internet Architecture Board, said the US announcement was negative for a lot of countries.

"It's not going to work in the long run to have the USA deciding everything by themselves," Faltstrom said. "It's clearly not good if one country can say no to what (DNS changes) are made in Sweden, for example. No country should be able to say no to that."


Political motivation

While the United States has yet to deny such requests, "the mere possibility of being able to do so is pretty serious", Faltstrom said.

"It becomes politics at a high level," he said. "It can only be worked out between the different countries. I don't see any technology in this."

In Japan, officials said the use of the internet for business and commerce - and keeping it available to all - would be debated further in light of the US decision.

"When the internet is being increasingly utilised for private use, by businesses and so forth, there is a societal debate about whether it's befitting to have one country maintaining checks on that. It's likely to fuel that debate," said Masahiko Fujimoto of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications' data communications division.

In 1998, the Commerce Department selected a private organisation with international board members, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, to decide what goes on those lists.

But Thursday's declaration means the department will keep control over that process rather than ceding it to ICAAN as originally intended.

Fracturing the internet

The US government has historically played the role of overseer because it funded much of the internet's early development.

Critics contend that in a worst-case scenario, countries refusing to accept US control could establish their own separate Domain Name System, thereby fracturing the internet, with addresses in some regions becoming unreachable in others.

Strand said that was unlikely, given the internet's reach and users' familiarity with it. "It's so huge and so solid that's it unlikely anyone would want to do that," he said.

"AOL tried to connect an internet on the internet and it didn't work. There can't be any walled gardens."

A United Nations panel is to release a report this month on internet governance, addressing such issues as oversight of the root servers, before November's UN World Summit on the Information Society in Tunisia.

Some countries have pressed to move oversight to an international body, such as the UN International Telecommunication Union.

 

Results of IP Tracking for 65.89.91.148

IP address 65.89.91.148
Hostnamewww.alneda.com
ISP Broadwing Communications, Inc.
Country United States



Extra Technical Information Broadwing Communications, Inc. BROADWING-2BLK (NET-65-88-0-0-1)
65.88.0.0 - 65.91.255.255
Broadwing Communications Data Center BRW-11034-NWRK-DATACENTER (NET-65-89-80-0-1)
65.89.80.0 - 65.89.95.255

# ARIN WHOIS database, last updated 2005-07-18 19:10
# Enter ? for additional hints on searching ARIN's WHOIS database.

 

OrgName: Broadwing Communications Data Center
OrgID: BCDC-2
Address: 1122 Capital of Texas Highway South
City: Austin
StateProv: TX
PostalCode: 78746
Country: US
NetRange: 65.89.80.0 - 65.89.95.255
CIDR: 65.89.80.0/20
NetName: BRW-11034-NWRK-DATACENTER
NetHandle: NET-65-89-80-0-1
Parent: NET-65-88-0-0-1
NetType: Reallocated
Comment: RegDate: 2004-07-15
Updated: 2004-07-15
OrgTechHandle: ZB13-ARIN
OrgTechName: Hostmaster
OrgTechPhone: +1-512-427-3700
OrgTechEmail: hostmaster@broadwing.com

# ARIN WHOIS database, last updated 2005-07-18 19:10
# Enter ? for additional hints on searching ARIN's WHOIS database.

 

did you actually read the whole wikipedia entry? hacked tracked and now owned by the usa or some such, it means nothing



now if you had retroactive info (as in september 11 2001) that was similar it would mean something, but you most likely don't that is provable, so you have nothing.....

 

You don't get it do you? Alneda is back up and running on a new U.S. Government IP address! Al Qaeda is just another U.S. government agency.


Do you even know what a Class A license is?!

http://www.arin.net

 

CyberFly


I have a wonderful idea for you.

Instead of trying to get your schizophrenic-paranoid rambling message heard by pestering a handful of people in here who really:

A) Don't Care
B) Don't Take you Seriously
C) Don't Like You

Why don't you start your own Blog site where you can post your delusions to those who actually want to read it.

Hell, you might even start a little following of weirdos just like you who will believe anything they want to believe as long as it fits their world view, and you can even throw up some advertisting and make a few bucks in the process.

I mean, if you're going to be a annoying paranoid troll, you may as well make some money doing it!

I just checked Registrar.com, and
www.CyberFlysRamblingParaniodBlogSiteAndIfYouQuestionMeYouAreAnIdiot.com is still available!!!

 

What a little skank. Just because you don't understand something doesn't make it, "schizophrenic-paranoid".


You probably would have said something similar if I had posted that the World Trade Center was going to be destroyed. So you speak for everyone?

 

Hey asshole!


All I did was offer you a money making suggestion that might even give a little meaning to your life, rather than posting the same crapola over & over again to the sixteen people that regularly view this site.

 

http://www.searchlores.org/

 

Wow.

Cyberfly is right, you are a skank. You haven't said anything original. You don't even understand the message. Ms. Kitty is the one who should be banned.

 

Oh no! Not that! Anything but being banned from Hip Forums!

 

you look good girl
screw

 

it said that the united states gov't had assimilated the site dumbass..... read your own bibliography and stop jacking off in the time you would other wise spend doing so.....

 

you are cyberfly, this is clear,
now
1. burn (shock and awe)
2. insurt rebar into your urethra by whatever means nesescary
3. make the determination for your self to die
4. do so in a gruesome way......


ban dodging is against the "eula" and so is multi posting...... now die......

 

Quest_Techie, are you some kind of douchbag eating fucktard?