appolo .........or how ever yer spell it . firstly can you define we ? . who the fuck duya mean WE. WHAT IS WE ?. QUESTION YOU SHOULD BE ASKING IS........how do i think i can contribute to stopping unessary wars. secondly people " can i ask you all individually to think for yourselfs as to the word terrorist . mathew is a terrorist " i am a terrorist according to mathew. but mathew knows that is not correct . again this word terrorist is used vastly these days.............why i ask meself................................chow
There seems to be an assumption here that people can only commit terrorist acts for good reasons (except the West, which apparently commits terrorist acts because it is evil, or controlled by jews etc etc). Why do we assume that terrorists only commit acts of terrorism because they are upset about things WE can sympathise with? Isn't this projecting our values onto them? And even worse, projecting solutions based on what we assume they want? Lets look at Osama bin Laden. Millionaire Saudi who went to Afghanistan to support/take refuge with the Taliban. He wasn't poor or oppressed. And what did he do with his money and freedom? He and other foreigners helped the Taliban wage war on ethnic minorities opposed to Taliban rule. The Taliban, meanwhile, executed women in full burquas in the middle of football stadiums, destroyed ancient buddhas, and presided over mass famine. It was by any standard among the most brutal, inept, destructive regimes on the planet. Meanwhile the US was, at the time, the largest provider of Humanitarian aid to Afghanistan. But who did Osama bin Laden attack? Not the Taliban. The US. So we're supposed to believe that terrorists care about justice? Stop projecting YOUR values onto people who behead aid workers and bomb electoral polling stations!
I find comments like this funny. Yeah, lets "overthrow the 1st-world governments" !! That'll solve everything. Meanwhile, you're sitting behind that computer, listening to your iPod, sending txt msgs on your cellphone and calling your boyfriend, all the while hating the evil "1st world governments." Where's the logic?
i was talking in accent" forgive me for not talking the queens english .now hope you understand . question remains the same how do you define WE ? . i see you can spell it " but i am interested and intrigued as to know how you define WE . hope my spelling is has improved now for you to answer the question "without your smart arse comments about spelling ( have you swallowed a dictionary). its one thing to spell and another thing to understand meaning .............regards
yes well, i'm glad 2 hear that. u do remember the pasting u gave me 4 linking to dewdney's noticeboard and not being aware of where all the links went that were on that noticeboard? u said along the lines of: "not knowing what i was linking to", "adding links i'd randomly selected from a search engine to support my argument that i hadn't even read myself". weeeeeeeeeeeeeell matthew...
I'm not exactly sure WHAT it is you want me to answer, but I'll try my best. Ok, so someone posted something about "overthrowing 1st world governments." To which I said, that if we do that then we're really "in the shit." So, now you want me to define "WE" ? Meaning, WHO is the WE that will be IN THE SHIT. Is this right? OK, the WE that will be in the shit is YOU and I, dear boy. Let's say we "overthrow" the USA, the UK, and the rest of the European Union. Be gone, evil ones! Then what? Will the world be a better place? Will the terrorists lay down their weapons and hold hands now that these evil 1st world governments aren't terrorizing them anymore? Will African children get off their lazy feet and make their own food, now that evil 1st world governments aren't there feeding them? The Cubans and the Haitians will really be in the shit because they can't take their boats to an evil 1st world government anymore. And all these free-lovin' 17-year-old hippies on these forums will be crying their eyes out because their iPods will stop working, their laptops won't crank up, their txt msgs will go nowhere, because those evil 1st-world government satellites will have stopped working as well. I do NOT agree with the war in Iraq. Bushie was a dummy for going there. I also do not think we can exit out of Iraq right now---we have to stick it out. I DO BELIEVE in the war on terrorism. And I am very aware that 1st world goverments (USA, UK and EU) have had their hands in "spreading" terrorism. Yes, we're partly to blame for the mess we're in. But I just laugh my ass of when I hear young idealistic teenagers (not saying YOU are a teenager) cry about the evil 1st world regimes, all the while driving evil 1st world government automobiles; using iPods and downloading music on the evil 1st world government Internet; smoking pot in their room which is located in upstate NY in some evil 1st world government town; and using pretty much this technology that has never been available before for anyone on this planet and then totally dissing the evil 1st world government that has been instrumental in developing this technology. I'm not sure if I answered yours or anyone elses question here, but goddamnit it felt good to get this off my chest.
u didn't answer mine: are YOU a catcher or a pitcher? u closet scatologist, u! (this is an in-joke; see Alternative Lifestyles>Gay>Catchers & Pitchers)
hmmmm see what you mean . thank you for explaining WE dear boy. as for (you saying )will african children get off their lazy feet and make their own food "now that the evil 1st world goverments are"nt feeding them. i would like to point out that you forgot to mention the terraine "droughts etc etc that these people have to suffer "to grow their own food . as for 1st world goverments feeding them " you also forgot to mention about the ordinary person in the street "charity"S and other ways etc etc people are trying to help . without going off topic just thought i needed to mention that . EVIL 1ST WORLD GOVERMENTS.........too much evil and not a lot of good governing .............THINK I WILL BY A TENT.........regards