The case for controlled demolition in the WTC collapse

To read the most concrete and convincing case about U.S. government complicity in the 9/11 attacks, read David Ray Griffin's "The New Pearl Harbor" (2004) and "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions" (2005). After reading these 2 books, at very least...you'll be shaking. There is a sure-fire prima facie case for a REAL investigation into what happened on that day.

www.truthemergency.us

www.septembereleventh.org

 

ok fair enough,first tho i only speak for myself an no 1 else, that said,lack of physical evidence keeps from forming "any" conclusion thus far.as far as the 3 skyscrapers, 1st off i have never, nor have any of you EVER seen a building dropped like that , "perfectly " in that time frame.let alone 3 of them. it is common knowledge a building of that size would take months if not years to prep.an would take a work force to large to go unnoticed. and not forgetting all the exposed notched steel beams,plus the 1's they would have to remove. lets go back to the people who were "burnt" from fire an exxplosions in the basement. they themselves hold "key" pieces of evidence.the source of the fires be it fuel or explosives would have left small but tracible amounts of the source on their clothes an bodys, but yet none of them had piece of mind to preserve any of it.an to date i havent heard of a bunch of people getting their clothes being repossed by the gov.if it was such a big cover up of all the evidence surely they wouldnt have let this slide. the fact that most if not all the evidence is gone..an most have formed their theorys without a single ounce of physical evidence, i will separate myself from that crowd an wait.......

 

Because these people probably didn't even know they had evidence on their clothing