.....if bush fixes everything he screwed up before he leaves office I'll create a new account and change my vote....... meanwhile, billy boy.....
You have every right to be here, but I always wonder why people who aren't hippys, and who seem to hate and despise hippys come here for? I mean, you have a right to post here, Gilligan, but WHY of all the sites on the net, do you choose a HIPPY board, if you are so resentful and contemptuous of hippys? I just don't understand. I don't post on "ProBush, Nascar watchin, Walmart shoppin, Right Wing" sites, telling them how wrong they are about everything, why, if you don't like hippys, do you want to be surrounded by them? Just a question. Not an indictment.
No, was your name in it? Really? Did you expect anything BUT angry responses when you post something like this on a HIPPY BOARD? Is that the way you display affection for people? As I said, you have a right to be here, but you seem to have a LOT of contempt for hippys. Why hang out on a place where you don't care for most of the feelings and thoughts of those here? I mean, if you want to, you certainly can be here, but I would think, reading your posts, that being here would be a very frustrating experience. You like hippies "as people" but think they are irrational and think they all think the same? I don't get it.
Hmmm.....it's my world view and my political ideas that make me a hippie. It's the world view and political ideas that make me profoundly uncomfortable around neoconservatives. The idea of profits for large corporations as being the greatest good rather than the needs of all people and the environment strikes me as profoundly evil. The values of the Republican party are about as diametrically opposed to my personal values as it is possible to get. However, I don't hate Republicans and find some of them to be "nice."
Maggie can i ask you why the hell you are so uptight about veiws that aren't the same as yours? I mean you bitched him out for not agreeing with your half understood notions of Marxism.
You people are insane to separate CLINTON from those others!! He is the EXACT SAME, and even worse when it comes to the Drug War. Hypo-Clinton with 40 VOTES????????????? It ought to be 0% all the way around.
Clinton was a better politician, but he needed to buff up the armed forces and he weakend them. I mean get people to enlist.
You may as well say Clinton because you are all brainwashed if you think there is a LEGITIMATE difference between any of those assholes.
...and that means I would have no idea what he did as president? Nice assumption, captain jack. Wow, a typo. You must be god or something.
Ha....not really, my friend. You really should stop sticking that stick further up your ass. EDIT: I'm saying 'not really' because I consider (most) media bias source, and there are ways to avoid it and still gather unbias knowledge.
There are people on these forums who voted for Dubya and Reagan? After all we know as a populace? Incredible...
I thought Clinton would be a really different president when he campaigned in favor of universal health care when he was running for his 1st term. I was wrong. He didn't do anything skillful at all to shepherd that initiative through Congress-instead, he let the Republicans kick the ball around and call him a 'socialist', etc., and the whole idea of universal health insurance that he had campaigned on died on the vine. It didn't even seem to bother him that much. I would say, if anything, that Clinton was the most harmless of the four, but that's really not by much. That's if I was forced to choose one.