London Bombing "Mastermind" Was M16 Asset, Covered For By M16

http://www.infowars.com/articles/London_attack/mastermind_mi6_asset.htm

Good Video....Turns out this Guy Aswat was not only working for MI6, but tried to set up multiple terrorist training campls WHILE he worked for MI6, when he fell under danger of being prosecuted, the MI6 actually covered for him, hid him away from prosecution...and the rest is history...reminds me EXACTLY of the kind of connection Bin Laden had with the CIA...Osama actually had the CIA meet with him for 10 days at a Hospital in Dubai WHILE he was a wanted terrorist...if the CIA had been doing it's job they would have taken him in right there...watch the video and see what I mean...

 

I think the fact it was aired on fox was because the CIA is trying to clear it's name, I am sure both the CIA and MI5/MI6 were involved with this guy, so the CIA put this guy out to clear their name and say that they were trying to arrest Aswat and the MI6 was hiding him and shielding him from prosecution when in reality both the CIA and MI6 were...

 

dunno. mi5/6 are really junior partners 2 the cia with fingers in all sorts of similar pies, apparently. ruppert claims the british probably helped the cia 2 stage 9/11 but i've not seen any such evidence myself. justin raimondo has been talking 4 a while about there being a split between the neo-conservatives and the cia, with the valerie plame business the cat's paw between them. i have a hunch, but i could be q wrong, that this is what the fox story is about: cia are playing a v dangerous game with bush et al. but when u consider what's at stake, and the stakes are very high, brinkmanship is what it's all about. if there's evidence that mi5 used an agent to mastermind the bombings in london then how far away are we from the same conclusions being rapidly drawn about 9/11? i doubt we're going 2 hear much 'analysis' in the mainstream press about this. i noticed that even the guardian had nothing about what fox had said. time to visit antiwar and from the wilderness 4 dose of reality...

 

True, but If the CIA can clear it's name about involvement with Aswat, and that they were playing the "good Guys" and trying to get ahold of this guy and prosecute him (Which i'm sure is complete bull) than they can dismiss theories that they had a hand in 9/11 or the 93' WTC attacks, etc. because they can say "oh we're the good guys, we try to prosecute these guys...don't blame us for anything"

 

strangely quiet in here, innit? matthew? point break? i'd be interested to know what u think about this interesting development.

 

Personaly i don't jump into every thread within 'america attacks' if i can help it pouring scorn on other peoples threads is sometimes rude.. you guys should have your time to chat and stuff now and again. Now you ask here goes..

These conclusions will be rapidly drawn. I think we should stay away from 'mastermind' ... He claims he was once a body gaurd / Hit man for OBL that will be right a 31 year old bloke from Leeds rises to the level of 'body gaurd' 'Hit man' OBL must be a real idiot.. This chap like Abu Hamza al Masri is a loud mouth zealot that decieded like the other simmering jihadis he would try and impress OBL with all of this.. Hyping him up as a MI5/6 stooge and a 'Al-Qaeda operative' is well i dunno a bit wishful thinking. Lets tell it like it is he is a fucking piece of scum who probaly helped plan with other idiots (for there own twisted ideology) the indiscriminate deaths of many many people .



"He was a British intelligence plant. So all of a sudden he disappears. He's in South Africa. We think he's dead; we don't know he's down there. Last month the South African Secret Service come across the guy. He's alive...the Brits know that the CIA wants to get a hold of Haroon. So what happens? He takes off again, goes right to London. He isn't arrested when he lands, he isn't arrested when he leaves... He's on the watch list. The only reason he could get away with that was if he was working for British intelligence. He was a wanted man."

In other words:

U.S. authorities had asked South Africa if they could take Aswat into custody. South Africa relayed the request to Britain, but authorities there balked because he was a British citizen, the sources said. While the debate was ongoing, Aswat slipped away
http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/europe/07/28/london.tube/index.html

LOFTUS: This is the guy, and what's really embarrassing is that the entire British police are out chasing him, and one wing of the British government, MI6 or the British Secret Service, has been hiding him. And this has been a real source of contention between the CIA, the Justice Department, and Britain.

JERRICK: MI6 has been hiding him. Are you saying that he has been working for them?

LOFTUS: Oh I'm not saying it. This is what the Muslim sheik said in an interview in a British newspaper back in 2001.

JERRICK: So he's a double agent, or was?

LOFTUS: He's a double agent.

JERRICK: So he's working for the Brits to try to give them information about Al-Qaeda, but in reality he's still an Al-Qaeda operative.

Excuse me how can he be a 'bouble agent' ...in reality he was more than likely questioned by the inteligence serviice..lied his as off about a multitude of things.. asked to 'inform' them of 'Al-Qaeda' activity.. Was released when he gave them a few tit bits and promises and went back to his 'activities' laughing in the face of the establishment.

I am sure because the network wants to be global OBL lets any fuck wit be a 'Al-Qaeda operative' as long as they use jihad and kill as many infidels as possible, he does not rightly give a shit..All part of the new Al Qaeda: local franchises
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/4700911.stm

http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0711/p01s01-woeu.html?s=yahw

Another 'double agent'

 

This is a video clip of some guy saying that some other guy said that MI6 may have been using the guy as an informant.

From here of course the same people who fell for Flocco immediately jump on this as if it were conclusive evidence and say "Turns out this Guy Aswat was not only working for MI6..."

Why would I get all worked up over that? Some guy said that some guy said...

 

hahaha typical pointbreak, i can read past your words and all I hear is that you have no way to debunk this because its completely full proof, this guy even went on Alex's show and confirmed that Aswat WORKING for MI6 even now, is exactly what he meant to say and is not just conspiracy theorists taking his words out of context.

 

OK. I am a shape changing lizard jew Illuminati.

Now prove me wrong. You can't. So I must be a shape changing lizard jew Illuminati?

Are you really that slow? I never said he was being misinterpreted, I said it was hearsay. It is impossible to disprove hearsay. How is "some guy say that some guy says" completely full proof? This typical of the standards you use for proof, and why you are a perfect candidate for conspiracy theories.

 

LOFTUS: Oh I'm not saying it. This is what the Muslim sheik said in an interview in a British newspaper back in 2001.

Find out who this muslim shiek is, if you can.

 

Ok fair enough...But seriously PB stop using the whole "Lizard Jew Illuminati" crap, it's just a useless insult on peoples behalfs, let's just have a conversation

 

I agree

 

As do I.

 

My point is not the SCTTLJI, my point is hearsay.

Please tell us what you mean by completely full proof and confirmed in this context.

As far as I can tell, unless you have other evidence you aren't sharing with us, completely full proof means some guy said and confirmed means some guy said twice.

 

Ok pointbreak, all this guy is claiming is that Aswat was working for MI6 for these reasons

-The Muslim Sheiks said it in a 2001 interview
-He was investigated for setting up terror training camps in Oregon but the MI6 told The Prosecutors to leave Aswat alone

 

just like the fbi told its agents not to investigate al queda, the bin ladens, and the 20th hijacker. whether or not this london story is true what flabberghasts me is that fox tv, fox of all networks, even ran with it. fox means murdoch means big power. something's happening when big power want to spread an accusation like that around the forum noticeboards. has any1 seen it repeated elsewhere?

 

This shit gets worse and worse. You see some shitty video of a bloke saying something bizarre, so you automatically believe it? *clap* *clap* *clap* Top marks for independant thought there, chaps!