What do you think of bush?

War crimes? hmmmm naw butter not.let's reelect him for another four years and really fuk this country up

 

bush is just a puppet to cheney and rove

 

bush has made us the laughing stockof the world..or i guess the idiots who voted for him did that..but bush has made us ythe most hated country for sure

 

With all apologies to those who put their faith in George W. Bush.

If you have yet to imagine anything better, then maybe the President's accomplishments seem good enough. However, I believe history will judge George W. Bush to be the worst president ever.

George W. Bush started a war. I understand the justifications (security, prevention, revenge) for going into Iraq. I just don't necessarily accept or believe they were appropriate to the situation, and I certainly do not believe that George W. Bush's "vision" corresponds with reality. However you choose to explain it, sooner or later you have to recognize the simple fact that the man started a war. If you can name three people throughout history who have started a war, put Bush in their company and then take that as one measure of the man.

It would appear, however, that such immorality doesn't count if it isn't sexual.

If, in spite of his words, deeds and policies, the man is actually more intelligent, conscious and creative than he appears, then I would suggest that he begin to offer less destructive and wasteful responses to the problems our civilization faces. It is difficult to believe, however, that the man is going to do any better. I just hope, for everyone's sake, that we have seen his worst.

Peace and Love . . . and sorrow,

 

Technically he never declared war so I really don't see how he gets around killing iraqs without being charged with murder. Other than that he takes money out of social security for tax cuts for the rich and this so called war. He has also hurt mother natuer.If someone sould explain to me how he gets troops over there without declairing war would make me happy.

Cheak out greenpeace.com

 

well lets see. i think the wtc attack was a act of war. an the war wasnt funded by social security ok. as far as mother nature, well george didnt set the oil well's on fire , iraq's i believe took responsibility for those.

 

He's a pretty terrible president.

He hasn't really done anything to piss me off too much lately, his energy bill and CAFTA were the best pieces of legislature he's gotten through in his whole presidency. The G8 confrence went as well as I hoped, and Bush pushed for the elimination of export subisides for African markets, which I pray will go through.

His social policies are pretty crappy though, I dunno if he's worse then Clinton or not, either way, I think this country might be better with someone who doesn't care about politics at the helm.

 

I'd like to get my hands on all those out-standings

 

I think he is a man of priciple, but not a great leader by any means. He relies too heavily on those around him to point him in the right direction. He is too much the frat boy still. He has strong faith though, and I like that, no matter how misguided, he still is honest and moral.

 

See Trekker, that's where you're wrong. In fact it's a huge error on your part. You can say tons of things about Bush that may or may not be accurate, but to say that he is honest is a sad thing because he is ANYTHING but honest. He and his administration are one of the most compulsively secretive administrations this country has ever seen. Nothing they tell us is from the heart. Nothing stems from morality. None of what they tell us is sincere. I can even see it in their eyes. Their primary goal is to stifle opposition at any cost. C'mon dude, wake up. To think that they are honest is to fall into their trap. In other words, they like where your mind is at...

 

ha, good point. He's only the puppet, the spokesman. He's not the man behind the curtain, that's for damn sure.

 

We were attacked on 9/11/01. We were also attacked on 4/19/95. One of these criminal acts was addressed as a crime, for which the perpetrators were brought to justice. The other was an "Act of War" to which we responded with two full-scale military operations that have cost thousands of lives, billions of dollars and the respect and good will of much of the world.

Why was "Act of War" the only way to think of the 9/11 terrorist attacks? What if we had acted on the premise that the 9/11 terrorist attacks were criminal acts, just as we did with the Oklahoma City terrorist attack? Why didn't we just solve the crime and bring the perpetrators to justice? Four years later, we still don't have Osama Bin Laden. Why is that?

 

he went up the creek without a paddle

 

terrible!

 

I think Bush is simply a closeminded republican, an idiot, a real live dumbass.

 

This thread is 'what do you think of bush' not 'post your opinions and then lets question them'.

 

http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/003450.php

...agh well thats life.

 

He's a hypocrite and he is FALSE. I saw him in New Orleans yesterday (of course, he only spent about an hour there, wouldn't want to get his $5,000 suit dirty) and his "Southern Accent" became stronger as he talked. What a, geez I hate the word, POSER. He wasn't even actually born in the South, he was born on the East Coast, but he's got all these moron Nascar watching idiots to vote for him and he LIVED in Texas for a time.

When he goes to the South, his "accent" gets stronger. He was there for a HOUR, it wasn't like he was picking it up. He did it on purpose to try to let the people know he was "one of them." (Yeah, he's a poor southern black whose been living in his own excrement for 5 days and hasn't had a decent meal in as long and is homeless.) This alone, can tell you what a faker this man is.

He should really be "one of the people" and instead of, AGAIN, telling us about "a lotta hard work" (which I think he talks about all the time because he has NO IDEA what "a lotta hard work" would be like to do!) it'll take to fix the Gulf Coast, he could have REALLY been "one of the people" he should have spent a night in the SuperDome. Let him sit in wet clothing, with maybe nothing to eat for 3 days but 3 or 4 MREs and a couple of bottles of water. Let him not have a shower, and be surrounded by tens of thousands of "his people" (hmmm. the state of Louisana voted overwelmingly for Bush, what does that tell you?) and have him sleep in a chair in the stands and have to take his shit in a toilet which hasn't flushed in 3 days. THEN maybe I'd gain some respect for him. But NO, he was wisked outta that dirty city before he had time to even smell the bodies smelling.

Hate? I try not to, but he is the worst president since Herbert Hoover. I only see things going from bad to worse in the coming years.

It'll take more than a decade to release us from the damage he and his minions have done. And that is ONLY if we get a NON Neo Con President right away and get a Liberal Congress. And of course, all the damage will be heaped on the NEXT Democrat president who gets in after Dubya.

I have no respect for this man. He is bringing this country into the mud, he is bordering on evil (only, I think you have to actually have a certian amount of intelligence to actually be evil and he doesn't have that) he is WRONG and he only care for people just like him. Rich, White, Male and LUCKY.

 

"http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/003450.php"

ok, so if saddam had a document mentioning a tie with a terrorist who had to do with 9/11 (although it's well documented that Saddam hated Osama and Al Queda), if we can launch a war on that basis, why didn't invade Israel after their possible complicity was shown by 5 israeli movers, cheering and video taping the planes crash into the buildings...later that moving company was linked to the mossad

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/fiveisraelis.html

 

'We' did not launch a war on that basis..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_UN_Security_Council_and_the_Iraq_war

Is there a link between saddam and islamic fundementalists or not ?.. We 'backed' OBL for a while, the fact that we are at opposite ends of the spectrum now means things change. The complicity of 5 people means nothing if the actual people doing any bargaining with us do not agree with these people.. Israeli diplomats [any diplomats] don't generaly go with the radid notions of the minority...including you and i.