The secular humanists are at it again (and here i thought they all died out in the seventies, extinct along with the pet rock). I mean, afterall it's X-mas now, what does X stand for? is it a variable? why don't they just say Christ (because "X" is a cross, and a very old way of saying christ, when a man who couldn't read signed something, it was with an X so it was a promise unto god, Plus X is shorter so you spend less $). And, unless you ever watch TV, Listen to the radio, go shopping, talk to people, or even go outside on some days you would never know Christmas is coming! (think of those poor hermits!)
Yea, I don't like those people. I'm not offended if someone says happy Honica or happy Qhanza, so why are they offended by merry Christmas?
i agree, i think its very scroogey to be upset that someone wishes you good tidings. when someone says happy chanukah..i dont scream "i'm not a jew!" I simply say thank you
I tell you what. Ill let you put chirst back in xmas if you and all other xtians promise not to drive to the malls while doing your xmas shopping. It really makes it a pain in the ass trying to find a parking spot
if only there were one person to blame for political correctness, i would enjoy killing him/her HAPPY BABY JESUS DAY!(and im not even christian)
x is the first letter of how christ is spelled in Greek, in which many of the original gospels were wriiten in/translated to. So you're wrong. What did YOU buy Jesus for his birthday so he won't burn you in hell?
I thought it was an "L", oh well, you learn something new every day. But the point still stands, that there is no threat to christmas, that the gorram holliday is still everywhere this time of year, and people like me aren't able to excape it. If i hear "rudolph the red nosed reindeer" or "Little drummer boy" one more gorram time i'm going to start shooting up malls or something... P.S. Any FBI agents monitoring this board should realize that i'm not being serious...
you guys should read this op-ed by the director of the ACLU Program on Freedom of Religion and Belief: http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2005-12-18-gunn_x.htm A fictional 'war on Christmas' By T. Jeremy Gunn Last December, a group called Public Advocate for the United States (which claims to defend America's traditional family values) sent some Christmas carolers over to sing in front of the ACLU offices in Washington. Carrying signs reading "Merry Christmas" and "Please Don't Sue Us!" — they also seem to have carried with them some rather strange imaginings about an assault on Christmas. (Related: Law doesn't mandate a secular Christmas | The year's dust-ups) I don't know what the carolers thought might happen. To tell the truth, the ACLU is not often serenaded by Christmas carolers. So it was with some excitement that the staff went outside and joined in the singing. They brought with them cookies and warm drinks to share. One staff member, who is an ordained Baptist minister, did a little witnessing about his faith to some astonished proponents of family values. Fox News did broadcast the event (as a part of its "war against Christmas" campaign). Although the visiting singers were shown, the cameras failed to include any footage showing that everyone had participated in the caroling. Rather than reporting the facts, the anchor preferred the propaganda: "We believe the ACLU heard the message loud and clear, but they don't care." The battle cries This year, several groups are once again introducing the Christmas season with some heated and misleading military rhetoric. Some declare, "There is a war against Christmas!" One group launched a "Friend or Foe Christmas Campaign." One particularly bizarre charge is that there is "a thorough and virulent anti-Christmas campaign." Without a shred of evidence, they pretend that there is an effort afoot to remove "God" from the Declaration of Independence. Two groups even announced that they have assembled hundreds of lawyers to protect Christmas against this imaginary threat. Make no mistake about it. These warrior-lawyers are not asking us to love our neighbors (and certainly not our enemies), nor to turn the other cheek, nor to be peacemakers, nor to render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's. Nor is this a joyful effort to encourage the Christmas spirit in the millions of places where it can be promoted without any conflict: in people's hearts, in their homes, with families, in churches, or with friend and neighbors. No, this is a campaign of military-infused rhetoric demanding that everyone accept one politically correct version of "Christmas." For example, this year in Boston — the same city where Puritans once prohibited the pagan-inspired "Christmas tree" — the new Puritans now demand that the city call its evergreen spruce a "Christmas tree," and they threatened a lawsuit if the city didn't comply. Another group charges that there is a "campaign of fear, intimidation, and disinformation" against seasonal symbols in Raleigh, N.C. — and they offer to provide a defense for the city against any threatened lawsuit. Yet they give no evidence that anyone is threatening a lawsuit. Before accusing others of engaging in "disinformation," perhaps these Christmas warriors should first take a look in the mirror. Why this desire to manufacture controversy — about Christmas? Guidelines already exist Rather than engaging in propaganda about a "war on Christmas," all who want to promote the spirit of Christmas should remember a couple of simple guidelines. First, Christmas displays — including nativity scenes — are perfectly acceptable at homes and churches. This religious expression is a valued and protected part of the First Amendment rights guaranteed to all citizens. Second, governments should not be in the business of endorsing religious displays. Religion does best when government stays out of the business of deciding which holidays and religions to promote. Religion belongs where it prospers best: with individuals, families and religious communities. And finally, as a seasonal greeting to all Christians: Merry Christmas from the ACLU! And for believers in all other traditions: Thank you for enriching our world! T. Jeremy Gunn is director of the ACLU Program on Freedom of Religion and Belief.
Another bullshit issue trumped up by Bill O'Reilly to get ratings. I watched him say that non-christians who get offended by "two little words" (Merry Christmas) are nuts. Then he turned around and said just seconds later that Christians have every right to be offended by "Happy Holidays" (two little words if I am counting correctly). Leave it to a douchebag like O'Reilly to turn the positive gestures of well-wishers into political statements. By the way, when I was a kid, much of what is called political correctness these days was known as common courtesy.
