Cut vs Uncut

Yes, I did read the thread that got shut down, and I want to add a few things. First, I'm a woman in the midwest US and prefer uncut men. It's such a rarity for Americans to find an uncircumsized man, I can see why the women want to move overseas.

For the folks out here, the cut rate about 10 years ago was 90% or so. Here recently, the rate is down to about 80% and still dropping. Why? Because the insurance companies deem it non-essential or elective surgery and won't pay for it. As was noted in the previous thread, there are certain instances where the foreskin is too tight. These cases are rare, and even so, just a small incision corrects the problem. Only in extreme cases circumcision is warranted.

Personally, I would love to meet any of the uncut men on this board. I would want to screw you senseless, and as many times as we could handle. One of my fantasies is to have a gang bang with all uncut men. Sigh, sadly it will never come to pass, I fear...

 

*signs up*

j/k

 

I was always glad i was cut til bout a min or two ago, damn my low maintence penis...

 

I don't think I'd like to be uncircumsized. I prefer my penis NOT looking like a tube sock.

No offence to anyone else.

 

you know, it only looks like a tube sock when it's flaccid. When it's erect, it looks like every other hard cock you see in porn...

 

<-- uncut, definately a more natural feel for women during sex.

 

I'm am uncut hot Hispanic male who would love to take you to new heights of ecstasy. If you ever tarvel deep in the heart of Texas, just look me up and we'll get together for a nice long sensual night of erotic delights.


ALI

 

Well blah, I like the appearance of it first off. I mean, that is how it's supposed to look! Second, I like the wrinkling of the skin at the base of the head. That extra bit of texture adds so much stimulation, it's unbelievable! Also, the foreskin allows the movement in and out to be smoother and more, well, natural! There's not the reliance on lubes or natural juices to keep the motion going.

 

I wish my parents had never had me cut. I mean, I started questioning it like 2 years ago and am now very disappointed that they made that decision for me. If I had any say back when I was an infant, I would of told them to stay the fuck away from my penis.

 

I dunno, maybe a dozen all told. The last 5 or 6 were from the UK, one was from eastern Europe, one was a US serviceman's kid who was born overseas, one was a preemie at birth, and the others were Americans that were just never cut.

 

Just for your information,

There are no medical benefits to circumcision at all. It does make the penis SLIGHTLY easier to clean, but by the same measure, chopping your ears off saves you time cleaning your ears.

There are many disadvantages to circumcision, such as it is EXTREMELY PAINFUL and can cause trauma, it is taken against the baby's will, it violates the child's rights, and it totally fucks with the natural development of the penis — the head is not supposed to be exposed so early on in life.

And of course the foreskin has 12 important functions:

1. To keep the head protected from shit and ammonia, as a baby.
2. The keep the head lubricated.
3. To protect the head with a waxy substance.
4. To assist intercourse by allowing the cock to glide in and out easily.
5. To provide extra skin to cover the whole erection, by unfolding.
6. To provide the man with more pleasure durings sex. (The foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis, and men who are circumcised as adults say most of the pleasure is gone afterwards).
7. To keep the head soft with emollient oils.
8. To provide an aid to masturbation and foreplay.
9. To protect the head from friction and abraision.
10. to reduce friction and chafing during intercourse.
11. to cover and bond with the synechia so as to permit the development of the mucosal surface of the glans and inner foreskin.
12. To contact and stimulate the G-spot of the woman.

Circumcision is a cruel and unnatural ritual, originally used as a sacrifice or a punishment, or a preventitive measure to stop a boy from masturbation. It has no place in a modern enlightened society.

I urge anyone reading this: when you have kids DO NOT do it to them!

 

I've heard the arguement that circumcision is no more of a mutilation than piercing your ears. To those out here that think this way, I must strongly disagree! With a piercing, you can always let the piercing heal shut. Once that section of skin is gone off a penis, you can't ever get it back!


Then there are those that say it's a religious practice no different than baptism. Again I say wrong! Baptism involves water on the head of the baby, nothing more. Circumcision is a lot more involved than that! You might also say that baptism as a baby doesn't leave any say with the baby. But the man later in life can renounce the upbringing that he had, but would still be intact. In the case of say a bris (Jewish term), if the man decided to turn his back on that upbringing, there's no way in hell he can grow a new foreskin!

 

Good points, Minnie!

 

I thought your points were excellent too, Dizzy

 

I completely agree that natural is best

 

I wish I hadn't been circumsized, but it is too late now. Hardly anyone in Australia is circumsized these days (less than 3%). My son is uncut. I cannot see what advantage removing an important part of the penis did, except to reduce my pleasure potential for the rest of my life.

 

You can see I'm 46, so I would say most would have been circumsized in the late 1950's. At least 80%. Maybe more.

 

cbrmale, were you chopped as an infant or as an adult? The whole idea is just deplorable in my eyes.... oh and yes, all three of my brothers were hacked up.

 

Growing up out west in the mountains, it was pretty much the norm back in those days. They don't know any different, really. My folks don't talk about it, it was just the accepted practice of the day.

 

My current boyfriend is uncut & is the first of the 15 men (the others were circumsized) I've been with to bring me to orgasm. Coincidence?

xoxo
cortnee