US government is banned from Wikipedia for altering facts

US CONGRESS CAUGHT MAKING FALSE ENTRIES IN WIKIPEDIA

January 30, 2006
Posted by Declan McCullagh

We already know, of course, that politicians live primarily for re-election and typically view the truth as an impediment to the higher purpose of unfettered self-aggrandizement.

Still, we can be excused for feeling mildly nauseated when fresh confirmation of this distasteful aspect of modern politicking surfaces.
The latest episode appeared last week in the form of a report that aides to Rep. Marty Meehan, a Massachusetts Democrat, deleted references to his broken term-limits pledge and massive campaign war chest on Wikipedia.

Then the trusty editors at Wikipedia got together and compiled a list of over 1,000 edits made by Internet addresses allocated to the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives. The IP address subsequently was blocked and unblocked.

An extensive analysis reveals how juvenile official Washington secretly is, behind the mind-numbingly serious talk of public policy.

One edit listed White House press secretary Scott McClellan under the entry for "douche." Another said of Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Oklahoma) that: "Coburn was voted the most annoying Senator by his peers in Congress. This was due to Senator Coburn being a huge douche-bag."

(Keep in mind these are the same holier-than-thou political climbers tasked with writing laws telling the rest of the country how to behave. Or else.)

This juvenalia is, of course, thoroughly bipartisan. Another change to the Iraq invasion entry shows that the anonymous congressional editor played up the dubious connections between al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein.

It's true, of course, that the cretins who are behind the Wikipedia alterations can (and probably will) do this from their home computers in the future. But the difficulty in policing the political class shouldn't make us any less alarmed at the most recent evidence of its misdeeds.

http://news.com.com/2061-10796_3-6033082.html

http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=536

 

so you're saying scott McClellan is not a douche?

 

Scott McClellan may not be a douche, but he is a Green-Wing Macaw, in other words, gay.Of course, I am also, so I have no room to talk.

 

This headline is a little exagerated. I am an admin on wikipedia ( http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Xaosflux ) and we HAVE had an issue with these types of edits, but we have not banned the entire government from editing. One of the 'pedia's drivign principles is presenting a neutral point of view, and we've had this issue with may groups, and they do generally die down after all their 'contributions' get cleaned up by the masses. ~~~~

 

It says here that you do not understand Bullshit.

How, then, can you clean up vandalism when it contains Bullshit? Most non-speakers of other languages can't identify what the other language is.

 

go wikipedia! i love them. and i love them even more for standing up to the gov't.

 

Actually it says: "This person does not understand Bullshit (or understands it with considerable difficulties or does not wish to communicate in Bullshit)." I'm more of the "does not wish" category

 

4|-||-||-||-|... 3`/3 533.