Will they Assassinate Kerry?

The war had been going on years before LBJ took office.

 

the only threat I saw with Sen Kerry tonite was the possibility of getting knocked out by a line drive in Fenway Park. He had the best seats in the ballpark, right next to the Red Sox dugout. I cant even dream of those kind of seats EVEN at Kauffman stadium in Kansas City. And poor Ben Affleck had to sit next to the Yankees dugout, getting heckled by Alex Rodriguez and his cohorts.

 

Yes, I was referring to the movie JFK. Oliver Stone did a good job IMHO. I particully like the run through that Costner did regarding the "magic bullet".

Vietnam was already in progress when JFK took office. I do believe he even commited troops there, but did not want to remain there. He had plans for pulling out, probably due to constant harrassment from brother Bobby....hehehe.

However this is a bit off topic...so back to Kerry. I just watched a CNN program on Kerry. It was interesting and gave me a better "feeling" toward him. Didn't know he was on the debate team at college. Isn't he suppose to debate Bush sometime in the future? That ought to be interesting...One who can't even utter completes sentences against a former debate team master. They said he has the ability to sense an opponents weakness in debating and goes for the jugular...Let's hope so...though if he makes Bush look like to big a fool....well maybe this topic will come into play after all.

 

Strange enough, I just got this in my email tonight:
http://www.1funny.com/presidential.shtml

According to this, Bush is the one who should be ducking.

 

I think an assassination would be a bit too drastic. I agree with freesue in that if anything the "powers-that-be" will just fix the election to ensure Bush's victory. I mean they basically fixed it last time, what's to stop them from doing it again? And especially now with the new electronic voting machines, how would we ever know who voted for who?

 

Woooohh... With the terrifying prospect of President Cheney in mind, I guess, for once, I have my fingers crossed for Georgie that he ducks well.

Think I've seen that Presidential curse list before... interesting factoids I guess.

 

I made my last post before reading all of your original. Now, I know you are the top dog and we're not suppose to tick off the power that is, but I have got to ask if you have ever been in an accident or something in which you bumped your head real hard? Not being disrespectfull, but man, I think you are a bit out there if you honestly belief Kerry is going to be assanated, or that Bush is sleeping with the enemy,(other than Isreal), etc.

The death of michael, I mean, Martin King, did in no way benifit the conservative party. It finalized his communist cause and that of the liberals. He became a legend and a hero - which he would have not become had he not been executed.

Personally, I don't think it criminal or bad to be a liberal. Funny and sad, yes; Criminal no.

I would really like to know how you came to this conclusion, Skip, as I believe it is a jewish, zionist influence that controls both parties.

8% is nothing compared to what the zionist control in this country. The Federal Reserve Bank alone controls the stock market and it is jewish owned.

Your last sentence - just telling you what I think, brother.

 

I'd highly doubt it. Kerry is sponsered by the same corporate powers as bush, so i don't think they give a shit who wins. either way, they win. we lose.

 

i'd always thought that the english and the dutch were the biggest investors in the usa.


as for kerry, no, i don't think he'll be assassinated.

 

"They" shot Reagan too.

What has Bush really done for the fundamentalists? Nothing. All they need is the usual scare tactics that abortionist gay loving librul athiests are going to be elected and they show up at the polls. After the election, they are kicked back to the curb.

Not even close. I assume this is from Moore's film. His numbers don't add up; it is more likely that Saudis represent 8% of total foreign investment in the US (stocks, bonds, real estate, etc). http://www.davekopel.org/Terror/Fiftysix-Deceits-in-Fahrenheit-911.htm#Saudi_Departures_from_United_States

And if nothing happens, what should we conclude? That maybe the anti-Bushies are getting as apocalypic as the christian fundamentalists?

 

Skip, for once I have to wholeheartedly disagree with your conclusions.


Kerry as a "progressive" alternative to Bush is a hilarious joke. He's a multibillionaire who has stated that he will INCREASE the number of troops in Iraq. He refuses, in fact, to state definitively that the illegal invasion of Iraq was even WRONG. He's a less attractive, less amusing Bill Clinton - all liberal rhetoric with no real action. He wouldn't even BE the candidate if he were truly an alternative to Bush. In other words, there is absolutely no reason whatsoever for the ruling elite to assasinate Kerry. He CERTAINLY should not be compared to Martin Luther King, for crimeny's sake.

What we have to understand is that, assuming Kerry is elected, he will provide the perfect patsy to increase troops in Iraq while deflecting blame away from the republican party. It's a little game these bastards play - they've been playing the same one for years. They play "conservative America" for a while, with a "conservative" figurehead, then they pitch their "liberal America" crap, and the figurehead's rhetoric swings the other way. Meanwhile, they very quietly continue doing exactly the same thing they've been doing for 20 years - looting the world of its resources, waging war against pathetic third world backwaters, carrying on disgusting CIA operations and coups, and supporting the wealthiest people in this country and around the world while turning the rest of us into wage slaves. The gap between rich and poor WORLDWIDE (including the US) has increased every year since Carter's presidency. The wars against the third world haven't stopped since WWI. The environmental destruction has accelerated (under Clinton, rainforest imports INCREASED). Americans have gotten fatter, more depressed, have less insurance, fewer work benefits. The power of unions has decreased alarmingly for 30 years. This has happened under republicans, democrats, liberals, conservatives. We would have to be blind FOOLS not to see it. And perhaps that, afterall, is the real problem.

 

Skip, what you haven't said (unless you said it in a post I haven't read, and if so, appologies) is that the greatest and longest lasting harm Bush could do is the appointment of Supreme Court justices. How would everyone like a few more Scalias? THAT is scary.

 

I agree Skip, Kerry may well be the lesser of two evils, but I believe he would be considerably less evil. What bothers me is the realization that most of us believed that about Nixon in 1968.

 

Well, Skip, that was the whole point of my post seeing as how Bush Duh hasn't appointed a justice. You can bet you ass he will, though, if he gets a second term. Rehnquist and Stevens are both in their eighties. Stevens is fairly moderate. Rehnquist is , well, Rehnquist. Stevens would be a loss, however.

 

Well, Skip, hopefully you will do an indepth search on these people that you mentioned - "specifically Rummy & Cheney & Wolfowitz & Kunteezer (of whom my people have a different name for) Lice" - you may find some very interesting facts. But these people are not just part of the game, they are indicitive of the game. You will find many of the same measure in each camp. I perceive you as an intligent individual and so I believe you are open to different views. Once you or anyone here does an open and honest investigation I believe that you will find that there are powers behind the obvious.

All of these were based on personal beliefs, nothing more. They should not be perceived as anything else. For me to say, "Skip is the greatest guy in the world and his site comes from God", is the same thing. In other words, Boykin is the only one who thinks "DEVINE RIGHT" is involved with Bush.

Cheney is definately in it for the long haul. Look at his religious affiliation.

That is enough from me. Lets just see if my post clears, or disappears.

 

>>"George Bush was not elected by a majority of the voters in the United States. He was appointed by God"
Lt. Gen. William G. Boykin appointed to the newly created position of Deputy Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence by G. W. Bush

Don't you people see? They believe Bush rules not by the will of the people, but by DIVINE RIGHT. We are up against a RELIGIOUS CRUSADE, just as Bin-Laden described it, and now it should be obvious for all with eyes open to see.<<

Just had to add....ya'all know who is one of the major consultants and players in the Bush campaign strategy don't ya? Good ole Ralph Reed, former director of the Christian Coalition. Rumor has it that Reed has had his eye on chairmanship of the RNC. So, I have to agree with Skip on this aspect. And, that's what is frightening about Bush to me. Anyone who thinks he is on a "mission from god" in a powerful political office...hmmmmmm