Shane99X's Anarchist Spotlight: Peter Kropotkin

Also known as " the Anarchist Prince"!

Oh what Russia could have been....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kropotkin

Prince Peter Alexeevich Kropotkin (In Russian Пётр Алексе́евич Кропо́тки&#1085 (December 9, 1842 - February 8, 1921) was one of Russia's foremost anarchists and one of the first advocates of what he called "anarchist communism": the model of society he advocated for most of his life was that of a communalist society free from central government. Because of his title and his prominence as an anarchist in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, he was known by some as "the Anarchist Prince". He left behind many books, pamphlets and articles, the most prominent being his works The Conquest of Bread and Fields, Factories and Workshops, and his principal scientific offering, Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution. He was also a contributor to 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica.


Biography

Peter (or Pyotr) Kropotkin was born in Moscow. His father, Prince Alexei Petrovich Kropotkin, traced his male line to the legendary prince Rurik; his mother, the daughter of a general in the Russian army, had remarkable literary and liberal tastes.

In 1857, at the age of fifteen, Kropotkin entered the Corps of Pages at St. Petersburg. Only a hundred and fifty boys — mostly children of the nobility belonging to the court — were educated at this privileged corps, which combined the character of a military school endowed with special rights and of a Court institution attached to the imperial household. He remained there till 1862, reading widely on his own account, and giving special attention to the works of the French encyclopaedists and to French history. Before he left Moscow, Prince Kropotkin had developed an interest in the condition of the Russian peasantry, and this interest increased as he grew older. The years 1857-1861 witnessed a rich growth in the intellectual forces of Russia, and Kropotkin came under the influence of the new Liberal-revolutionary literature, which indeed largely expressed his own aspirations.

In 1862 he was promoted from the Corps of Pages to the army. The members of the corps had the prescriptive right of choosing the regiment to which they would be attached. Kropotkin had never wished for a military career, but, as he did not have the means to enter St. Petersburg University, he elected to join a Siberian Cossack regiment in the recently annexed Amur district, where there were prospects of administrative work. For some time he was aide de camp to the governor of Transbaikalia at Chita, subsequently being appointed attaché for Cossack affairs to the governor-general of East Siberia at Irkutsk.

Opportunities for administrative work, however, were scarce, and in 1864 Kropotkin accepted charge of a geographical survey expedition, crossing North Manchuria from Transbaikalia to the Amur, and shortly afterwards was attached to another expedition which proceeded up the Sungari River into the heart of Manchuria. Both these expeditions yielded most valuable geographical results. The impossibility of obtaining any real administrative reforms in Siberia now induced Kropotkin to devote himself almost entirely to scientific exploration, in which he continued to be highly successful.

He quit the army in 1867 and returned to St. Petersburg, where he entered the university, becoming at the same time secretary to the geography section of the Russian Geographical Society. In 1873 he published an important contribution to science, a map and paper in which he proved that the existing maps of Asia entirely misrepresented the physical formation of the country, the main structural lines being in fact from south-west to north-east, not from north to south, or from east to west as had been previously supposed.

In 1871 he explored the glacial deposits of Finland and Sweden for the Russian Geographical Society, and while engaged in this work was offered the secretaryship of that society. But by this time he had determined that it was his duty not to work at fresh discoveries but to aid in diffusing existing knowledge among the people at large, and he accordingly refused the offer, and returned to St. Petersburg, where he joined the revolutionary party.

He visited Switzerland in 1872 and became a member of the International Workingmen's Association at Geneva. The socialism of this body was not, however, advanced enough for his views, and after studying the programme of the more radical Jura federation at Neuchâtel and spending some time in the company of the leading members, he definitely adopted the creed of anarchism. On returning to Russia, he took an active part in spreading revolutionary propaganda through the nihilist-led Circle of Tchaikovsky.

In 1873 he was arrested and imprisoned, but escaped in 1876 and went to England, removing after a short stay to Switzerland, where he joined the Jura Federation. In 1877 he went to Paris, where he helped to start the socialist movement, returning to Switzerland in 1878, where he edited for the Jura Federation a revolutionary newspaper, Le Révolté, subsequently also publishing various revolutionary pamphlets.

In 1881, shortly after the assassination of the Tsar Alexander II, Kropotkin was expelled from Switzerland by the Swiss government, and after a short stay at Thonon (Savoy) went to London, where he remained for nearly a year, returning to Thonon towards the end of 1882. Shortly afterwards he was arrested by the French government, and, after a trial at Lyons, sentenced by a police-court magistrate (under a special law passed on the fall of the Paris Commune) to five years' imprisonment, on the ground that he had belonged to the International Workingmen's Association (1883). In 1886 however, as the result of repeated agitation on his behalf in the French Chamber, he was released, and settled near London.

In 1902 Kropotkin published the book Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution, which provided an additional means for animal and human survival, beyond claims of 'Survival of the Fittest' proffered at the time by some Darwinists, such as T.H. Huxley. (See Murray Bookchin and social ecology, and also sociobiology).

"In the animal world we have seen that the vast majority of species live in societies, and that they find in association the best arms for the struggle for life: understood, of course, in its wide Darwinian sense -- not as a struggle for the sheer means of existence, but as a struggle against all natural conditions unfavourable to the species. The animal species, in which individual struggle has been reduced to its narrowest limits, and the practice of mutual aid has attained the greatest development, are invariably the most numerous, the most prosperous, and the most open to further progress. The mutual protection which is obtained in this case, the possibility of attaining old age and of accumulating experience, the higher intellectual development, and the further growth of sociable habits, secure the maintenance of the species, its extension, and its further progressive evolution. The unsociable species, on the contrary, are doomed to decay." -- Peter Kropotkin, Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution (1902), Conclusion. Prince Kropotkin's authority as a writer on Russia is universally acknowledged, and he contributed largely to the Encyclopædia Britannica, including an entry on anarchism in the 1910 edition (see external links, below).

Kropotkin returned to Russia after the February Revolution. He died on February 8, 1921 in the city of Dmitrov, Moscow province and was buried at the Novodevichy Cemetery, Moscow.

[edit]


Timeline of Kropotkin's Life

• 1857 - joins the Corps of Pages where he begins to develop a rebellious reputation.
• 1858 - Peter's early writings show interest in political economy and statistics, begins contact with "real" peasants.
• 1861 - Peter has his first prison experience as a result of participating in a student protest.
• 1862 - becomes disillusioned with royalty when as page de chambre to the tsar he witnesses the extravagances of court life.
• 1862-1867 - at his own request serves with the military in Siberia. Witnesses the living conditions there, and the unwillingness of the corrupt administration to do anything to improve this.
• 1868-1870 - pursues survey and geographical studies.
• 1871 - becomes interested in the workers' movement and the events surrounding the Paris Commune.
• 1872 - travels to Switzerland, where he joins the International; returns to Russia with a quantity of prohibited socialist literature.
• 1873 - as a member of the Chaikovskii Circle, he helps with rewriting pamphlets in a way that can be understood by the uneducated; he shows great ability for communicating with the workers.
• 1874 - Peter is imprisoned in the Peter and Paul Fortress because of his revolutionary activities. At the intervention of the Geographical Society, he is given special dispensation to work on a paper on glacial periods.
• 1876 - Escapes from a military hospital and moves to England.
• 1877 - Returns to Switzerland to work with the Jura Federation. Attends the last meeting of the First International in Ghent.
• 1881 - Attends the International Anarchist congress in London. In his propaganda of deed he supports the assassination of Tsar Alexander II on the grounds that an explosion is far more effective than a vote in encouraging the workers to revolution. This gets him kicked out of Switzerland. The Russian government is embarrassed when he discovers a plot to assassinate him in London.
• 1882 - Shortly after moving to France he is arrested for his work in The International and sentenced to five years in prison. He stays there until 1886 when he is released on condition that he leave France.
• 1886 - returns to England. Learns of his brother Alexander's suicide in Siberian exile for political activity.
• 1890s - Spends most of his time writing. Visits Canada and the United States in 1897. The Atlantic Monthly agrees to publish his memoirs. In his books he attempts to develop an anarchist-communist view of society.
• 1901-1909 - writes material in Russian for readers in his homeland. He was very disappointed by the failure of the 1905 revolution.
• 1909-1914 - returns to Switzerland on condition that he refrain from anarchist activities. Tries to publicize the massacre of 270 workers at the Lena gold mines, but this activity is cut short by World War I.
• 1914-1917 - actively supports the war against Germany as a war against the state. This position, a strange and questionable one for an anarchist to take, alienated him from many of his associates, particularly Errico Malatesta.
• 1917 - Returns to Petrograd where he helps the Kerensky government to formulate policy. He curtails his activity when the Bolsheviks come to power.
• 1921 - His funeral at the Novodevichy Cemetery, with Lenin's approval, becomes the last mass gathering of anarchists in Russia.

[edit]

 

Meet the Man!

 

The Best of his Works: The Conquest of Bread

Anyone still believing that an anarchist society would be economically unsound should give this a good read.

FULL TEXT:
http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/Anarchist_Archives/kropotkin/conquest/toc.html

excerpt:

This text was taken from a 1st edition of The Conquest of Bread, G. P. Putnam's Sons, New York and London, 1906.
THE CONQUEST OF BREAD

[size=+1]by P. Kropotkin[/size]

[size=+1]CHAPTER XIV[/size]

[size=+1]Consumption And Production[/size]

[size=+1]I[/size]

LOOKING at society and its political organization from a different standpoint than that of authoritarian schools- for we start from a free individual to reach a free society, instead of beginning by the State to come down to the individual- we follow the same method in economic questions. We study the needs of individuals, and the means by which they satisfy them, before discussing Production, Exchange, Taxation, Government, etc.

To begin with, the difference may appear trifling, but in reality it upsets official Political Economy.

If you open the works of any economist you will find that he begins with PRODUCTION, the analysis of means employed nowadays for the creation of wealth; division of labour, manufacture, machinery, accumulation of capital. From Adam Smith to Marx, all have proceeded along these lines. Only in the latter parts of their books do they treat of CONSUMPTION, that is to say, of the means necessary to satisfy the needs of individuals; and, moreover, they confine themselves to explaining how riches are divided among those who vie with one another for their possession.

Perhaps you will say this is logical. Before satisfying needs you must create the wherewithal to satisfy them. But before producing anything, must you not feel the need of it? Is it not necessity that first drove man to hunt, to raise cattle, to cultivate land, to make implements, and later on to invent machinery? Is it not the study of needs that should govern production? It would therefore be quite as logical to begin by considering needs and afterwards to discuss the means of production in order to satisfy these needs.

This is precisely what we mean to do.

 

"In the animal world we have seen that the vast majority of species live in societies, and that they find in association the best arms for the struggle for life: understood, of course, in its wide Darwinian sense -- not as a struggle for the sheer means of existence, but as a struggle against all natural conditions unfavourable to the species. The animal species, in which individual struggle has been reduced to its narrowest limits, and the practice of mutual aid has attained the greatest development, are invariably the most numerous, the most prosperous, and the most open to further progress. The mutual protection which is obtained in this case, the possibility of attaining old age and of accumulating experience, the higher intellectual development, and the further growth of sociable habits, secure the maintenance of the species, its extension, and its further progressive evolution. The unsociable species, on the contrary, are doomed to decay." -- Peter Kropotkin, Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution (1902), Conclusion.

How's that for "the problem of human nature"....:H

 

What a dude

 

a hundred years and the world, except for having fancier toys, is back where it was then, and the road not taken still becons. not the road of adam smith OR carl marx.

nhilism and the tzar's assassination were the big mistakes. and lenin's militance.
and i blame christerism for most of that. for its having become a personality cult.

as with christ, we don't need a personality cult about kropotiking but to listen to
the perceptions he advocated. it is the 'little' people togather who make history.
the 'big' people only come along and take credit for it after the fact.

we do not need to commit nor condone acts of violence. but we do need to boycott
the causes of harm and suffering. how we can do that. there is no one size fits
all answer for each individual, and i mean to condem no one's part.

i am neither as wise nor persuasive of that wisedom as this world needs nor as yet
has anyone else been. if anything it appears to me we suffer from a surfiet of
persuasion. even if some has been less poorly considered then others.

that is why i support, not the tearing down of institutions, but the end of continuing
to support them. particularly when they give little or nothing in return.

and that includes fanatacism of ALL idiological, economic, and religeous flavours.

the circular illogic of little green pieces of paper IS fanatacism. just is much and more
then any procustian equalization.

=^^=
.../\...

 

themnax, i love you man.

 

I'm thinking of buying "The Conquest of Bread" in real form. I know you can get the full text online for free but I heard it's such a good book that it's a must have if you're an anarchist. Sort of an "Anarchist Bible" I guess.