pressed rat long time no converse the little I know about communisim , is based primarily on my reading of the abc of anarchy published 1920 by the freedom press london in that book it described the many types of communisim how the eroupted in eroupe and for what cause and for what final intent, communal anarchy so from my understanding, communisism, and all its forced principals were in place so as to change the mind of society and thus change the social nature of man, from working against eachother to working for ONE cause, problems man I see greed sneaking its face so quick its not funny, especially if the mass is lliving on what it needs, but the folk holding the rivers of cash are living for what it desires....hence the csars. ccp and so forth, the ideal died when the rest of the word passed it by in capitalist stuper personally I agree with the ideal of communisim, though i cant say im much for oppression, the last few years Ive been doing highway child, a nomadic commune, tribe of sorts, we live communally ithat all of the money we make goes into one pot, which pays us all our food, entertrainment fuel ect....but were more democratic then most communists, we decide the spending as a vote, we elect the treasurer, its completely voluntary, your on the bus we live that way dont like it dont be on the bus, ..... I knwo it makes travelling much much easier.....though in the end there isnt any personal financial gain, more just a means of survival.
Who? You certainly can't be talking about Communists, or be so ignorant as to believe that there is any person on this Earth without morals.
LoL. Dude there are plenty of people on earth with no morals. Their called murdering crackhead child rapists, and there are enough of them. Yes communists do have no morals my man. Think man is just an animal, that should be herded like sheep. Communists are elitist pigs, the idea looks good on paper just like every single person says, but it doesn't work with human nature, although it addresses and faces the fact of violence, obeidence, and all other "canine" characteristics of mankind. Did Lenin or Stalin have morals? No they were evil dipshits. LOL
So you admit you lost. Dude I just named tons of people who have no moral base. That was a dumb line rephrase it to be like maybe some people just have morals backwards and think murdering is helping something. Most people do it for the pleasure, and they got off on the fact they have no morals. You ever seen Basic Instinct?
All people have morals. They might not be morals you agree with, or they could be completely insane, but they still have morals.
he dont care about moral at all and we have no obligation to teach him. he only wants to win, no matter it's moral, immoral or amoral. i dont think 20 is too young, maybe im wrong. When i was a child, i hate communism, but at that time i even didnt know Marx was a German. i was selfish. guess the same shit happens to him
What morals are you talking about you fuckin idiot. Your only 16 shutup. I have 4 years on you and this is an obvious example. There are people with no morals. You are a communist supporter and hopefully not American. Lenin, Stalin and Marx were all Jews that went against their God that raised them and got their families through tough times. They renounced this god for atheism, and dialectical materialism. Every conflict is solved by violence and humanity is a beast to be herded by those elite in charge. What are you basing this knowledge of alternate morals on? What morals do they have? What are you making up in your own silly little fantasy world here? Maybe you should use a different word, because the dictionary definitions for moral goes like this Of or concerned with the judgment of the goodness or badness of human action and character: moral scrutiny; a moral quandary. Teaching or exhibiting goodness or correctness of character and behavior: a moral lesson. Conforming to standards of what is right or just in behavior; virtuous: a moral life. Arising from conscience or the sense of right and wrong: a moral obligation. Having psychological rather than physical or tangible effects: a moral victory; moral support. Based on strong likelihood or firm conviction, rather than on the actual evidence: a moral certainty. So if you are amoral you contradict your beleif in this crap. A moral means ANTI-MORAL, AGAINST-MORALS. THEREFORE YOU CANT HAVE ANY. IT HAS TO DO SOLELY WITH GOOD AND BAD. SO IF YOU VALUE BAD MORALS YOU ARE A-MORAL, therefore eliminiting the word morals to be used to describe your beleifs.
lmfao. CHYOUU! LOOOSEE! That was really stupid, and since you have no backbone in trying to attempt a logical or even illogical response you say that. Your a baffoon, lets see what Green has to say.
Take that cigar out of your damn mouth, and actually say words LMFAO. This is like a damn kindergarten arguement. You haven't said one fact yet. Green has just said people can be immoral and amoral. Which they can't be and still practice morals or morality. Cut that cigar, fill it with weed and fuckin smoke it. It isn't even a cuban or anything man. See is this a moral response? No It was immoral because I took your feelings into consideration and still said it. Therefore I have no moral base on that attack, except the fact it was everything "against morals". Explain to me something, Cooloner wtf do you have to say you couldn'tve just typed out right there?
Communism will never work with power hungry, money hungry, and blood hungry people in our society. In order for communism to work in this day and age, there would need to be a complete collapse of the economy and political systems as well as a major catastrophic event in the infrastructure of our society. Communism is an idea, than when applied from mind to paper, is erased, edited, and skewed to support the agenda of the people in control. You cannot run a country under communism, but you can run a small group of people who are willing to give blood, sweat, and tears for each other. But why would you want that? There is no growth, only repetiveness. Like Nimrod said, a caste system is the only thing that would work in this day and age so long as the wealth and power are distributed properly, something that doesn't happen in todays capitalist/facist state.
You say Nimrod is incurable, so I guess I am too. "Those who are far gone have merely traveled deeper into the world and what lies to be discovered." -me So instead of being a dick when you are faced with an oppurtunity to have an intellectual discussion, try and listen instead of waiting for your turn to speak, it will make all the difference in actually learning something.
yea, thats what i thought. i think ill setup a paypal account on here so my talk won't be cheap, and only those who seek the truth shall hear thou speak! Communism, at the expense of your house, your job, everything you own, and your family, dying everyday just to live, working hard for the other guy.
Damn cooloner you've lost BAD now. WAY BEHIND. I suggest you have a reasonable response prepared. cuz yer gettin OWNED.
many out there are just unable to distinguish hate and respect hate with respect, u never understand the dignity this is where "incurable" applies besides, im quite sure u guys have never read Marx's original work u swallow what they offer, which is nothing but poison
i love how when anyone threatens your belief they never have anything to say, but love to critisize everyone else's. Communism doesn't work. Never in this day and age will you see a mass concentration of Communist's. It would not be called communism by what we define it as. Nothing ever amounts with communism except war, law, and corruption. It is not humanly possible to ever control that many people. Now, if you were to say communism worked with say, a 1,000 people in their own territory, not surrounded by culture and influence, then yes it could work, they're called Amish people.