WW3 Will begin soon and Last into 2007

far be it from me to interfere in humanity's collective death wish, but as you point out, nukes aren't neccessary, and as i was saying; we ARE stabbing ourselves in the back environmentaly.

for all we know, even human over population isn't neccessarily going to end any time in the next few millinea, but it does seem to be spiralling toward unsustainability.

i still think the most likely thing is a period of human population starve back.
a rather miserable time which people will undoubtedl CALL the 'end' of everything.

wars in some sense may continue to go on through out it. people are sometimes senseless enough to do so. people continuing to kill each other while starving instead of helping each other to survive is not unheard of by any means, rather all to common. but how common will it remain.

there is also a real possibility that collectively as a species we just might not remain retarded infants up to the last moments of our self inflicted demise, however we might go about otherwise inflicting it.

the worst of times could be now. and the blindnessess endemic to the dominant culture, or that culture itself, could chainge. while no movement has as yet been able to do so, time and hunger have a way of moving people idiology and even violence often do not.

=^^=
.../\...

 

Hey guys lets spread some love and understanding around,you never know it might catch on and we can avoid all these worst case scenarios.The genesis for every action is a thought

 

full of shit

 

As long as Ireland is ok, the rest of yous can shag off!!!!!

 

lol.. that was only a joke.... u know i love you guys
peace and love

 

Ireland =

 

nonsense, WW3 wont begin in the near future. and it will be the end of human race.

 

You very well could be right but the fact is there are so many different situations on how and when the world will end its rediculous. You could read nostradamus's predictions and they sound pretty much the same as yours but yours sounds less believing then his do. And then theres the whole bible prophecy about the four horses or whatever they are and the end of days and the time of peace and messiah. But the fact is until it happens no one is going to give a rats ass. But other then that you are wrong about the next anti-christ because it will be that new german pope that looks like the devil.

 

please leave the religion crap out.

 

the only wwiii there's going to be is bush's already ongoing war against international law. how that ends remains to be seen but let us hope it ends soon and with a damp fizzle.

the four animal riders of the asphixiation are war, death, famine and disease. they've been with us for rather a long time now but it looks like death may soon have war for lunch instead of the other way arround. at least that's what i'd make odds on.

=^^=
.../\...

 

Haha, I have no doubt a world war 3 will occur soon, if we don't change our ways. But is it religious? You bet your ass it is. Bush will bomb Iraq in THE NAME OF JESUS CHRIST! Is this anti-christ stuff true? Of course, in daddy bush's eyes. SO E'S GONNA KILL THE ANTI-CHRIST for god. Everything revolves around christianity at this point. Is Christianity the universal truth? I dont think so.
People are caught up in their religion, so anxious to see war carried out, so it'll happen, unless we change our ways.
Times they are a-changin' for the bad.

 

okok...WW3 is coming i think

Mabus will soon die, then will come,
A horrible undoing of people and animals,
At once one will see vengeance,
One-hundred powers, thirst, famine, when the comet will pass.

this nostradamus wrote. Mabus....anagram Musab .... Musab = musab al zarqawi , leader of al quaeda

he was killed today by the americans.

And crazy shit, a fragmented comet just passed in may , the closest from earth that has passed since more than 20 years...if its a coincidence its fucked up

 

well yes, the kind of nuts who want there to be a wwiii are running the u.s. now. have been for what is it; six years now. that's why you don't hear about them in idaho any more. the're all in d.c.

but i refuse to go along with this nonsense of making dear enimies out of a bunch of sand dunes that may have oil under them and a bunch of poor bastards stuck with having to live on top of them between the u.s. and it's 'blood wine' (i.e. oil)

=^^=
.../\...

 

I wanna see russia blast at the U.S. The US got too much control in the world.

 

why can't there just be peace

 

TPB

Human ignorance and stupidity

Occam

PS. Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, does not go away

 

actualy there can and quite possibly will.
i could point out that neither piece nor war are themselves eternal.

when people stop convincing each other there is anything to be gained by robbing one another's calmness, well that is beyond peace, that is heavin.

there's no "can't". there's just the matter of what people choose to feel is more important to them.

you know lots of different things are important at the same time. but people tend, i think, to loose track of which are MORE important and for longer then the current moment.

people soon tire of things being any one way, and then insist on them being, come hell or high water, some other.

when times are at their worst this isn't always such a bad thing.
when times are at their best it COULD be used to make them better.
but usualy isn't.

then of course there are the accumulated effects of trying to keep anything the same that eventualy themselves force things to chainge whether anyone wants them to or not.

but as far as a world where people didn't go arround beating each other over the head, yes i think we could have that.

people say they want it. but then they turn arround and say (and act) that trying to impress each other is more important. or excitement. or something else.

so it really gets back and comes back arround to what is more important, what people act on as being more important, not what they say is, or even tell themselves.

important enough to learn objectively what kind of incentives their priorities ACTUALY create AND choose them accordingly.

if everybody cared enough about peace to do THAT, then we would have it.

even if people cared to objectively analyse what actualy does and does not bring them gratification, instead of assuming the veracity of some popular simplistic/romantic euphamism about it. (often spread deliberately through implication by those who themselves immagine to be getting something out of doing so)

to make a long story short, there are reasons we don't have peace, but there is no reason we can't. the same diversity of reality that does nothing to prevent either the rise or fall of tyrannies, likewise does the same for peace and war.

we just happen to have at this juncture in human history a dominance of core values and idiologies which create more opportunities for the one then the other.

which is also a thing that can, and may well at some point be forced to, chainge.

some point well within the next thousand years if not the next hundred.
over a period of time that will likely take more then a decade, but can begin any time.

without expecting or waiting for magical dates on arbitrary calenders.

=^^=
.../\...

=^^=
.../\...