join my army of nuts! and to archieve the goal, we have to get everyone killed during this war, for the prehistory is the only anarchy.
nah, just the sources of structure. no reasom to nuke the gobi or montana, but bejing and dc are a must.
i dont think anarchy will start by us having a big revolution or anything... i think it will start when more and more people start to realise that they are being controled, and take back their own lives. once everyone takes back their own lives, then we wont need a revolution because we will already be living as free people. if the majority in america for example, become anarchists, then who will the state have to control to try to bring them back? im hoping this spiritual revolution will happen sometime durring my life, but if not its worth fighting for and helping others realise what is wrong.
nope you are wrong. anarchy will never occur unless the power strucures in place collapse. people waking up is a first step, but the realizzation that something is fucked up and getting rid of are two different things. I am not even an anarchist and that much is obvious. they closest thing you will ever experience is if you go move to the hills unabomber style. you will never be free, accept that.
Anarchy will be brought about by getting rid of politicians and political systems The word "anarchy" itself means "without a leader" and therefore is the answer to the question. When we can effect a state of continual being unthreatened by outside forces, in which society is transformed from one which has political leaders to one which does not. This entails a rethinking of social systems and indeed political systems as the only envisagement of an anarchist is toward a form of communist democracy, in which political communes are established for the production and bartering of food and other commodoties. Such a system would not necessarily entail the end of capitalism since communes would be free to choose their brand of anarchy. A period of nihilism is envisaged before anarchy could be empowered
Anarchy will be brought about by getting rid of politicians and political systems The word "anarchy" itself means "without a leader" and therefore is the answer to the question. When we can effect a state of continual being unthreatened by outside forces, in which society is transformed from one which has political leaders to one which does not. This entails a rethinking of social systems and indeed political systems as the only envisagement of an anarchist is toward a form of communist democracy, in which political communes are established for the production and bartering of food and other commodoties. Such a system would not necessarily entail the end of capitalism since communes would be free to choose their brand of anarchy. A period of nihilism is envisaged before anarchy could be empowered
it will occure when the people are fed up, and realise all is not ok, and that they need to overthrow the government. for it to work though, people need to realise first that human nature is fucked up adn no one person has the right to rule over another one. only once the common person fully understands the concepts of anarchy, will it actually work.
I'm not even sure that kind of stuff is aloud on these forums. But either way, you're a sick piece of shit. I know you probably think it's a joke but I don't think people want to see this kind of shit when they're debating a serious issue (although by the looks of it I doubt you can understand what's going on). Grow up, stop jacking off to rotten.com pics, read a book and stop poluting the thread with your hilarious pictures.
I'm sure he feels just terrible. But really, you're covering up for a lack of insight with offensive pictures. It certainly doesn't speak well about your character.