oh most definitely. a little better if not more. we don't need some born-again, conservative, pro-lifer moron ruling the country.
Resident Bush is doomed, one way or another. Huge blanket statement, to be sure, but the fact is he's nearing the end of his reign. So, he can either fix-up the election and win that way, or he can shut the whole thing down and impose martial law. Whatever he does, there's no way he can win it fair and square, and he knows it. Of course, there're too many ppl already in this country who are onto his angle, so no matter what he does, he's doomed ultimately. Trin
They said McGovern was gonna beat Nixon in 72' and he fucked up big time and got crushed in a landslide. Maybe Bush will try to make Kerry fuck up.....
Don't kid yourself Seadragon, Kerry won't be any better than Bush (unless you happen to own stock in Heinz).
Its amazing: Bush is the single biggest problem with the world, steals an election, underminds the economy, starts an illegal war, robs the American people of their tax dollars to pay for that war, takes away ALL our civil liberties, and in many other ways ruins the world; yet he is still a moron! Doesn't really make sense does it? Don't forget that there a several million people working for the governemt, and it takes everyone of them to "ruin the world". There is no way the President can do it all by himself. Emotionalism, simply put.
It doesn't make sense to the extent that Bush doesn't even know what's going on and isn't making any decisions. It's the people behind him like Rove, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and the rest that are making all the decisions.
Alot of presidents use their advisors advice, that's why they are there, Reagan did alot and it worked for him pretty well. In his re-election, all but 1 state voted for him.
It's curious. Since it's quite possible that Bush will be reelected (by people outside of your social circle), you have no way to predict that he will, without a doubt, lose. He could most certainly win "fair and square." But you, a microcosm of the left, have drawn your conclusion before the facts are present. -Atlas
A LITTLE better off? Try extremely better off. He's such an ass. I don't really like Kerry either, but I still think he'd be better than Bush. Hell, 99% of the world population would be better than him. Speaking of advisors... You know Hilary ran the white house... johnkerryisadouchebagbutimvotingforhimanyway.com
Yeah, peaceful420, keep smoking your weed and making "legitimate" observations. and people wonder why nobody likes hippies.
grrr....its posts like these that make people not listen to teenagers. Can you explain how 99% of the population would be better without him? Seeing as how more than 1% of the population is "rich", your statement is inaccurate.
I don't think the "rich" are the problem! I've never been employed by a poor man. you are right though, this post is rediculous! 3% of the population cannot read or write! A much large percentage didn't graduate High School, and an even large percentage never went to college!
This is a little off topic, don't you think. Don't you realize this is a hippy forum? In fact, the URL is www.hipforums.com Did you just come here cause you hate hippies so much that you wanted to show us how mature you are with all your badgering and scarcasim? Wow...you are so coooool.... You need to grow up. I don't run over to the redneck forums to bash on you
Hey, that's not a nice thing to say. Smoking Grass is a personal decision, and has nothing to do with Peaceful420's ability to put his two cents in about politics in america. I smoke weed and am very political and have a good knowledge of what is going on, and it doesn't block my brain from debating issues and knowing what's going on in my country and the rest of the world. Leave your cheap shots at home and make some real, fair, worthwhile posts that actually challenge what we say. Peace and Love, Dan
I believe you've all missed the point. He made an absurd claim, one that he could never backup, like one you would make if you were high. If he were high on crack would his observations be legitimate? If he were drunk would his observations be legitimate? Being stoned doens't make your claims credible, never has. Do you think anyone would take a Senator seriously if he proposed a bill that was written while he was intoxicated? You pick out one comment, in response to the stupidest claim ever, and describe my entire purpose and mentality! NICE! Way to label people. You should try a little less emotion. I like how smoking weed is a personal choice that doesn't negatively affect anyone, but sarcasm WHOA BUDDY!!!!!!
Please, no one here is falling for your bullshit, Hippy Hunter. You are wasting your time. But oh well, it is your time to waste, isn't it?
If nothing else, voting Bush out of office will send a message that if you run the country the way he has you can expect to be a one-term president. And if he's re-elected, what message would that send? "Keep up the bullshit, we're behind you all the way!"