The "booster"jab...

A booster for what? What purpose does this serve? It is a well known fact that after recieving this jab most children become quiet and withdrawn, it is quite normal for them to loose all speech ability for a number of weeks, so what the hell is in it? We think its possibly an agent to calm children or effectively "dumb them down", a setback this early in childhood could mean a person is years behind in terms of general intelligence and wisdom by the time they reach adulthood, a phenomenon I would think is very usefull to the soul controlling rulers of today...just a thought. Anybody know what the actual purpose of this injection is? My mum was a nurse and she has no idea, frightning stuff, what do you guys think?

 

Dumbs down the mind and damages the immune system.

 

Are you talking about a shot or punching a kid ?

 

Hehe, its an injection all kids get when theyre a few months old, except they dont tell you what its for like the other jabs, just that its a booster.

 

hmm sounds sketchy.

 

The official explanation for the booster is to renew the original vaccine's effectiveness, which is really just a bogus excuse for injecting even more crap into people over a period of time that is damaging to both the body and mind.

The number of vaccinations has risen dramatically in recent years, and there are constantly new ones coming out that are being promoted in a favorable light by big pharma and the media. The goal is to get kids while as young as possible, while their brains are still developing, so by the time they're adults they will be so brain damaged they won't be able to think for themselves. They will be submissive and complacent, just like the government wants them to be.

Besides mercury and cancer viruses and such, who knows what is being put in these vaccines. With nanotechnology, they could be putting nanobots into these vaccines and you wouldn't even know it because they're so small. With this type of technology, you don't even need microchips because you can administer these nanobots, which can be used in the same way (for tracking, surveillance, mind control, etc..) without a person's knowledge.

 

Huh, it was my friend james who made me think of this and he mentioned nanobots too, do they really pu mercury and CANCER viruses into vaccines?? Thats quite possibly the most horrible thing I've ever heard, whats wrong with these people???

 

You name it. They're extremely sick. Their goal is control, by any and all means necessary.

 

No, they don't.

 

It makes sense that the number of vaccinations has risen looking at technology, 40 years ago, airbags were the thing of dreams, 20 years ago, a terabyte was unheard of. But, now we have these things, so why not a shot for continued protection of a newborns health.

And what evidence do you have of this. Can I see some evidence of cancer, mercury, and nanobots?

 

What makes you so gullible as to believe it's for anyone's protection, simply because that's what they're telling us? Are you so naive that you believe the government and the big money interests that control it are actually looking out for you are your well-being? Don't give me this shit about a newborn's health. Most of the shit they're vaccinating against poses no threat to an infant that is healthy and well cared for. These vaccinations do far more harm than good, if they do any good at all, which I strongly doubt.

Well, I never claimed nanobots are in the vaccines for certain, but they very well could be, and we would never know it if they were. The technology is out there, and I wouldn't put it past those with the power to resort to such measures if they can get away with it. As far as mercury, anyone who knows about thimerosol, which is used as a preservative in vaccines, knows it's a derivative of mercury, which can cause brain damage, especially in young children.

As far as the cancer viruses are concerned, read these articles:

http://www.gulfwarvets.com/vexing.htm

http://www.infowars.com/print/vaccines/vaccine_scandal.htm

http://www.newdawnmagazine.com/Article/Are_Vaccines_Causing_More_Disease_Than_They_are_Curing.html

http://educate-yourself.org/vcd/knowaboutvaccines24oct02.shtml

 

Reading those articles makes me wonder if any vaccination is safe, I cant help that think humans are meddling with things that were not ment to be tampered with...

 

I doubt any vaccinations are safe. I, unfortunately, was vaccinated as a child. My parents didn't know any better. Thanks to me, they do now though

And it's also highly suspect that they require them to enter the school system. This is simply a means of making sure all children get them. Logically, if a child has the vaccination (this is assuming they are good for your health, which they are obviously not) then a child that doesn't poses no threat to their health. So why does every child need them to enter school?

 

If this is the case why is it that most, if not all of us, were vaccinated and think for ourselves quite well. I'm most certainly not brain damaged, and I don't need to be told by big brother that I'm not. Booster shots have been going on for quite some time now; is this a recent change in the effects of them that bring on this suspision or is it just suspision?

 

I know this guy who got an immunization, and 12 years later i saw him at a mall and he had NO facial hair, like at all, and his eyes were shifty looking. i'm very observant, actually very Psychic - but i dont like to say that too much as people may become paranoid that i am reading their minds and am like a god to them - but anyway he was looking at a movie poster for that totally awesome "Air Bud" movie, but i could tell he was really thinking about Babies, and hating them. it was probably a powerful psychic image and i definitely think that he is probably capable of enhanced speed and +5 on his ciggarette smoking ability.

It made him into a bald faced baby hater!

when will the government learn that these incredible super human experiments can only lead to one thing.
Baby hating. and all because he wanted not to get sick. now he is barely even human.

it is all so obvious now, i can't believe we didn't see it before.
*worriedly starts searching for his bag of "psy-enhancing" ketamine*

 

i think you'll find that the main problem with boosters/innoculations was a large number at one time used a mercury based preservative, mercury being extremely toxic, particularly on young children.

 

Well, actually, most people cannot think for themselves. Many people believe they can think for themselves, but their thinking is based on what has been given to them to think by the powerful few who feel they need to control what the public can and cannot see and hear, thus think.

Vaccinations are just one of the many ways they keep us from reaching our full potential as sentient, sovereign human beings. While vaccines containing neurotoxic thimerosol can profoundly effect some children who are more sensitive to the effects of these toxins, for most people the effects are less noticeable but there nevertheless. The damage inflicted by these vaccines might not be enough to cause noticeable brain damage in most people, but it is enough to dull their mental capablities just enough, making them more passive, apathetic, and easier to control. It's kind of like fluoridated water, where the people consuming it don't notice the effects, which are more subtle and do more to keep people in a state of chronic apathy versus a full-blown stupor. The same applies to vaccinations.

 

I question everything, so obviously I give thought to the theories you present. (I hope you don't take offense to me not taking these as fact but I assume you understand). The problem is a lot of the things you present as your reasoning are double edged swords. You say many people feel they're thinking on their own but are thinking along the lines of what the upper few want them to think. Has it ever occured to you that perhaps the things you believed are fed to you to blind you to other things that may be far worse than what you really suspect?

 

It can't get much worse than some of what I've learned of, which I rarely talk about in these forums because it's just too far out there for most people to comprehend.

The thing is, nothing has been "fed" to me. The information I have is information I have had to seek. The information that is "fed" to people is that which is disseminated through the TV and the newspapers in which most people get their "news" from. People don't have to seek this information out because it is just given to them everywhere they turn by the major power brokers who control the media. In the US, all television news media is controlled by no more than FIVE corporations, and people are naive if they think the big money interests want them to have the truth. Truth in the hands of the public is a weapon against the ruling and corporate elite.

The information I have accumulated, which spans a seemingly endless number of topics, is the based on the work of dedicated historians, researchers, professors, doctors, and dedicated citizens who don't have the ties that the corporate, mainstream media does.

So again, I have to ask myself who has the real agenda and the real motive.

Who really benefits from deceiving people and keeping them blind?

 

I'll PM you with the rest of the conversation if you're ok with that so we don't hijack this thread completely. That alright?