I think he sucks, for lack of a better word. He is an establishment Leftist gatekeeper shill for the NWO. When it comes to the truth, he is no less disingenuous than George Bush. This isn't to say that some of his work isn't good, but the overwhelming majority of it, I feel, is rubbish that does more to mislead than inform. I am basing this on Chomsky's ignoring of relevant issues, such as those regarding the attacks of 9/11, as well as his tendency to be biased in favor of Left-wing politics instead of in favor of the truth, which transcends party lines and slanted political ideologies. Chomsky seems to be the spokesperson for the controlled "progressive" Left, in line with people such as Left gatekeeper Amy Goodman of the establishment "Democracy Now," which alone makes him questionable. Chomsky is your typical establishment intellectual, promoted by the establishment as the voice of the "progressive" Left, when he is really just one of the many voices of biased, politically charged, polemic garbage and disinformation. Despite his status as a professor, I see him no different from the rest of the dime-a-dozen pundits the establishment gives the masses to follow like sheep, be it Michael Moore, Ann Coulter, Bill O'Reilly, or any of the other idiots paid to promote a given viewpoint that points anywhere but in the direction of truth.
Good article about Chomsky here, titled Noam Chomsky: Controlled Asset of the New World Order: Part One: http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?id=3632 Part Two: http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?id=3633
If Karl Marx was connected to the New World Order,then why didn't the global elites make sure that Marxism didn't fail?
But Rat as I’ve pointed out your seem to support the kind of policies that only assist the Establishment. Everything you seem to champion or suggest seems to end up actually helping the rich elite’s. I’ve been asking you questions about these seeming contradiction in your arguments for well over a year now and in all that time you have never seriously attempted to actually refute by criticisms. Why do you shout so loudly that you wish to ‘bring down’ the Establishment, yet you seem to be, more quietly, doing your best to support it? Try coming back to - http://www.hipforums.com/forums/sho...48&page=1&pp=10
Well, you are wrong about Marxism failing. It's just that through propaganda and doublespeak, we have been lead to believe that it has failed when it is in fact as alive as it has ever been, only more concealed and discreet, veiled by names like liberalism and socialism. Just read the Communist Manifesto and see that almost everything that was proposed in it by Marx has become a reality in our present-day society in America, from the income tax to the centralization of credit by means of a central bank (ie: the Federal Reserve).
Blah blah blah.... You must cut and paste the same crap over and over. How can I refute your criticisms when your criticisms are attacks or accusations that pose no real questions to be answered? You keep saying that I support the kind of policies that support the establishment (an assertion), yet you won't say how they support the establishment (and how the policies you support don't). You just repeat the same tired chorus lines over and over as a defense mechanism for being unable to engage in any kind of real debate. These tactics are not only pathetic, you have also worn them out. Throw that trick away and try a new one.
Lets look at the facts: Rat you are probaby between the ages of 25 and 35, you post on an internet forum,you show pictures of yourself alone in the mirror, you show pictures of yourself with beer, to me you are a loner that obsesses over conspiracies. Now I really would like to believe every word you say as true but in the end you are a bit insane and are completely infatuated with governmental conspiracies. Just admit it you probably have little or no friends mainly because they are sick of you ranting about crazy shit, so you have no one to talk to and in the end you just sit at home and drink while ranting online to random people. Its sad but true and even you have to admit it.
OH my poor little Rat You are on record as championing right wing libertarianism, you have even admitted at one time to being a libertarian and voting for the Libertarians. In fact you have attacked about every other political viewpoint EXCEPT right wing libertarianism. Now I’ve asked you if your views are not right wing libertarian in nature (on many occasions) and if so just how they differ but you refuse to answer, so it would seem clear they are very similar. Now I’ve written at length about how this type of libertarianism just aids the wealthy elite’s (you must remember some of them you sparked off many of the posts). But if your memory is that bad you just need to go to the libertarian forum here to get my views. Now how left wing policies would limit or nullify the power of the wealthy elite, I’ve again written about it at length (I’ve just given you some examples in another thread). But I’ve got nothing to hide I want to talk about politics, I love political discussions, want to ask me a political question just go ahead. Rat for someone that is quick to call others ignorant and goes on and on about how extensive their research is isn’t it a bit sad that you can’t seem to keep up with what is going on in a forum that you post to daily?
OK. Let's take your idiotic remarks sentence by sentence. 1) I don't make it a mystery what age I am. It clearly states in my profile that I am 25 years old. Even if you are an illiterate, you should at least be able to make out the number 25. 2) I do post on an internet forum. This is self-explanatory, I think. Don't you post in here as well? So what is your point? Yes, I post in an internet forum. I post in several. Wow, aint that a real mind fuck! 3) I have taken A picture of myself alone in the mirror and posted it in the Member Photos forum. So what? I don't think I am the first person to do that, and that's hardly proof of me being a loner. Some people post pictures of themselves every week which are far more flattering to their image than the one I posted. 4) I have never shown a picture of myself with beer, though I have posted a few images of different exotic beers. 5) I am somewhat of a loner, but I do not spend all my time at home reading about conspiracies. Unlike you, I work for a living, and that takes up a lot of my time. But yeah, when I am not working, I am usually researching. I don't think there is anything wrong with that in a society where most people are content having garbage downloaded into their heads while sitting in front of the TV for hours on end. That is the first paragraph dissected. Please show me how anything you wrote relates to the topic of this thread. Second paragraph: 1) I guess it depends on what your definition on insanity is. If it's asking questions and seeking the truth, not being a typical slug content with buying the garbage that is fed to me by the establishment, then I guess I am guilty of being insane. And I am quite proud of that. I find it to be quite ironic that a person can obsess over football or their favorite movie star, yet for me to talk about the things I talk about means being met with scorn and ridicule. We live in a society that has been conditioned to police itself, and you display this trait perfectly by ridiculing anyone who doesn't regurgitate what the media says. When a person is a slave, they feel that it is necessary for others to be slaves as they are, never questioning a thing, simply going along with the status quo. 2) I have friends, but I do prefer to be alone than in the company of others. So what is wrong with that? Is there something wrong with that just because it's different from what you do? Again.... you haven't addressed one thing that's on topic. You simply made assumptions about me in an attempt to degrade me. You are like many on these boards who do not have any facts. It's funny, because a few months ago you were going along with everything I said. Now, here you are attacking me along with the rest of the forum neocons.
No. That's because Marxists only see things as portrayed by their heroes. Most people are too conditioned and not smart enough to see beyond the doublespeak. It's like the people who believe that Bush is a conservative when he is anything but. They SAY he's a conservative, so he must be.
As I said you are living in a dream world full of enemies. In your head they are all out to get you. You call them neocons and they are the devil. That is all the evidence I and others need to evaluate you as a bit insane but again theres nothing wrong with that.
And yes I was with you earlier in terms of your knowledge but I've now seen the big picture with you. Everyone is the enemy and you are all alone trying to keep your head up in a world full of evil. You never take anyone elses comments seriously and right off others as neocons or typical dumbed down americans. I'm done now.
gee, yet you accuse balbus of repeating the same rhetoric, yet, we have to read this garbage day in and day out, almost every thread you make.... how hypocritical......
yup, thats exactly his plan. he trolls around like no other. he belittles everyone who opposes him and repeats the same lines over and over....... sounds more and more like the so-called neocons and elitists he is out to "destroy"
I don't think anyone is out to get me. What I do know is there is an Elite who wants to eliminate national sovereignty in favor of a world government, destroy the family structure, dumb the population down, and use fear to get the populations to willingly give up their rights. Now if this is a conspiracy to you, you are just badly misinformed. I don't fear a thing because I know what's coming. I think the people who are really fearful are the people who buy into what the media tells them, which is designed to divert people away from the reality of what's really going on. The people who are really fearful are those who buy into this Islamic terrorism myth, unable to see the forces that are really behind it and how it's being used to manipulate the masses into accepting things they normally wouldn't accept. I am only out to TRY to inform others. It has nothing to do with me thinking people are out to get me. they aren't out to get me anymore than they are anyone else.
