So after having a tattoo on my leg and one on my back, I notice a pain difference. Getting my leg done hurt waay more than my upper back. But then maybe it was just the tattoo artist? The one on my back also did not scab up or bleed half as much. Anyone have any ideas why that is?
Like a heavy hand maybe? The scab was nasty on my leg, and I bled, alot. It was a bit of a shock to get my back done and have no bleeding, little pain and normal scabbing. Also for my back I put alot more thought into it and did alot of research to find a good artist. For my leg, it was a walk in, "can you do this?" Half assed sort of thing. and the moral of the story is...
