Right, I'm a newbie so it's definitely presumptuous of me to post this but anyways.... There seems to be a real issue with endangering valuable resources by posting overly specific and indiscreet information with regard to them. When more experienced members and guests here post their objections to this, the result is an online and almost explicit debate that makes it pretty obvious that there is something, somewhere, to hide. Isn't there a more effective way to deal with this than posting? I probably know less about web admin than most of you know about 2,7[ethyliodobenzyl-4-propyl]-phenylethylbutane fumarate but couldn't the offenders just be booted the fuck out. Please, feel free to either warmly commend my sentiment, or if you prefer, viciously mock mjy abject naivety.
You can buy idiot posters here: http://www.art.com/asp/display-asp/_/id--4936/George_W_Bush.htm Pretty good selection.
excellent selection. The research chemical community in general is shitty and full of idiots compared to how it was pre web tryp.
yea that's a good'n, I like the one with the pope where he is holding his head and it says "he's dumber than I thought"
are you lot in the states? did you feel the tremor when the world pissed itself laughing at "more and more of our imports are coming from overseas"...?
No, we were too busy cleaning up our own piss after he dubbed himself "The Decider." I even started calling myself the decider for a while because I make bad decisions.
I really hate to say it because Bush is an idiot - But all our imports do not come from overseas. We receive imports from Canada and Mexico, so, it's entirely possible that he was discussing perhaps that we are getting more and more oil from the middle east instead of from Canada.
