Question regarding time

Discussion in 'Christianity' started by Alsharad, Nov 30, 2006.

  1. Mester

    Mester Member

    Messages:
    284
    Likes Received:
    0
    time is mede up, feectiun
     
  2. Alsharad

    Alsharad Member

    Messages:
    541
    Likes Received:
    0
    Possibly. Conceptually, I would agree. However, if you have an object of infinite density, then even a slight sliver of the object would have the same density as the whole object because every part of the object would have infinite density. So, take a sphere with infinite density. Split it in half, both halves are infinitely dense. There is no division (either conceptual or actual) that leaves me with an object with less than an infinite density. We can divide time conceptually into moments, but we are still left with an infinite amount of actual time between each conceptual moment.

    I agree with what you are saying but I think there is something that has not been addressed. A point, by definintion has no mass and no spacial extension (it does not take up space). Further, without mass or spacial extension, it follows that it doesn't exist in time. A point is nothing actual. No actual thing is made up of actual points because, by definition, actual points do not exist. Points are conceptual in nature. If time actually exists, can it consist of what is actually nothing? A line is conceptual, but there are no actual lines. You can't experience a line. We can experience space and time. Space is "composed" (for lack of a better word) of nothing. Can we say the same for time? If we can, then how are we capable of experiencing it? If time is a continuum, then there are no actual divisions. It simply is. Futher, as a continuum, it is not made up of an infinite number of actual moments, but is composed entirely of itself, an indivisible whole. So perhaps the line analogy doesn't really work at all?

    What do you think?

    Of course you can transverse an infinite amount of nothing (conceptual divisions). But can you transverse an infinite amount of *something*?

    You never know. If relativity theory is true, then it always has been true but the idea didn't come around until the last hundred years. [​IMG]

    How do you respond to the astronomers and physicists that assert that time had a beginning and/or that it began with the big bang? I am curious.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice