Has anyone noticed a difference between LSD and LSA?

Do you find it to be "Shallow and pedantic?"

 

you guys are cool

 

Very. I'm figuring you are making a point and am eagarly awaiting your response. I do so find this entire thread amusing however do not mistake my feelings for taking it as a joke.

Odd......Random......Sarcastic? We will just have to wait-and-see the answer to that question.

 

Coming from someone who obviously has more experience here than me......9 posts?!? Tsk Tsk!

 

haha if anyone cant tell the difference from LSD and LSA is extremly significant they have never done LSD in the first place. end of story. go right ahead and sell ur fake acid doesnt really bother me, but i bet ur bussiness wont hold up long

 

Well, I would make SEVERAL comments on your grammar, but from your lack of such it's obvious you are not concerned about it.

Also, did I not ALREADY state it was a stupid idea? Why are you still barraging me with criticism for doing it? Logic would dictate that if an idea is stupid, any reasonable person would not progress with it.

 

im sorry i guess i missed you saying it was a shit idea in the 6 pgs of u defending and bashing. btw what point r u trying to make by pointing out grammar errors on a MESSAGE BOARD, do u go into to chatrooms and tell ppl they have bad grammar too? thats just pathetic

 

where do u state that ur idea is stupid?

 

Children always have such vivid imaginations.

OMFGLMFAO! My WHOLE point was that I wasn't doing it! OMG you make me laugh so hard!

BTW I think you mean grammatical errors lmfao....

 

ur saying by pointing out my grammar errors, that ur point is that ur not pointing them out.... ok... then right after u claim this point u say "do i mean grammatical" as opposed to grammar, thats just childish

and after again pointing out a silly grammar error (which i couldnt really give a shit less anyway) u fail to mention where u stated that ur idea is shit (thats wut i was actually interested in, since nowhere do i see that u say that)

 

Again, you fail to see my point. I completly conquered your question by stating that I hadn't done what you thought I had. Your question was completly fueled by ignorance. It was kind of like (it's a little hard to compare but this is the best I could come up with) asking when the food is going to be ready while your in a skydiving plane (Where they don't serve food!).

Now that we got that cleared up, I have some other things to say. Why does the word "Childish" pass as an insult around here? I rather think it's childish to call someone/something childish, And the same goes for "Immature". I honsestly just don't see why that word is being thrown around like an insult.

Furthermore, let's get a little deeper here. Why EXACTLY do YOU >>>NEED<<< to know MY point? Are you not content enough that you have to pry and pick at other people for their ideas and intentions? The only logical explanation is that you attempt to progress your ideas further by the assimilation of others. MY DEAR GOD!!! THAT'S BORDER-LINE PLAGIARISM!!! *wink wink*

Pointing out you made a GRAMMATICAL error served to purposes: the primary of which was to see if you had grasped my point yet, and the sencondary was merely to taunt you. You may think it is "childish" to to taunt people, but why is that; why do people consider everything that would cause harm to another person childish? Why do people automaticly assume that fighting is a "childish" quality, aggression, impulsiveness, revengfulness? Most people don't lose these qualities when they get older, however they do tend to pacify them; is that why people assosiate them only with the young? Well how about giving our children credit for some positive qualities to? Fearlessness, honesty, loyalty, conpanmanship?

Dwell on this please.

 

now that makes twice...

by childish i guess what i was getting was actually the irrelevance of u having to pointing out grammar. i guess i should have expected ud take the most meaningless part of my post extremely literally, my bad

DONT DWELL ON THIS for it may lead u to side track

 

let me state this a third time (so u dont go a get semantic again)

 

?!?

I can't understand your mumbling!

*Mumbles* Anti-semantic bastard....(threw it in for fun [Quote from House M.D.])

SINCE you are blind AND dumb AND probly deaf too, I will show it to you.


Posted 12/16/06 at 1:14 PM:

"""164 actually. BTW 160 is qualified as genus. The thing about these forums is that even if someone has great attributes (fast, strong, smart, ect....) no one will accept or believe you b/c anyone here refuses to exept that another person may be better than you at something. I have taken 54 IQ tests and averaged them making the conclusion of 164, of those 4 have been from qualified psychologists, and the rest are from an online subscription (1-year membership to Tickle).

Quote:

Not only does Texas have one of the lowest test score averages in the nation

The fact is that (absolutly no racism intended) 37% of hispanic males in texas in the position to take thoses irrelivant (as in that is the future generation not the present which is what matters) tests just don't care. The outliers should be taken out and not counted.

BTW I have a completly different deminor in other threads, I shouldn't be crusified for one stupid idea (yes I'm admiting it).

Quote:

For two, I guarantee you are not much higher than that from your spelling, grammar, and shitty attitude alone.

Just a suggestion.

"Just a suggestion." is not a sentance, enuogh said about your grammar."""






DO YOU SEE IT YET?

 

yep u caught me, im blind

 

I knew you didn't hit Micheal Jackson with that cruise ship on purpose, you just couldn't see him......right?!?!?

 

this thread is der de der...

 

Watchout using those big technical terms, why....*gasp* your might hurt your-self!!!!!