ban freedom of speech

Discussion in 'UK Parties and Protests' started by paulfreespirit, Dec 11, 2006.

  1. paulfreespirit

    paulfreespirit Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,368
    Likes Received:
    6
    fuck off ...................born wid gobs wernt we ?
     
  2. paulfreespirit

    paulfreespirit Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,368
    Likes Received:
    6
    37 views and no comments guess freedom of spech has been banned already ..............:( :( :( .........oh dear .
     
  3. Duck

    Duck quack. Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    22,614
    Likes Received:
    47
    iun't get it...
     
  4. fountains of nay

    fountains of nay Planet Nayhem!

    Messages:
    6,218
    Likes Received:
    4
    Get on Paul... you have your say mate :)
     
  5. dapablo

    dapablo redefining

    Messages:
    2,701
    Likes Received:
    1
    About time too, cut down on all that bleedin noise.
     
  6. paulfreespirit

    paulfreespirit Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,368
    Likes Received:
    6
    maybe we should talk in clanger mode (supplied with batterys )
     
  7. Elliott

    Elliott Banned

    Messages:
    400
    Likes Received:
    0
    thats been done on other forums. on other forums you arent allowed an oppinion unless its the same as the person running the site. laim huh
     
  8. dapablo

    dapablo redefining

    Messages:
    2,701
    Likes Received:
    1
    It's cool here dude haven't seen a moderator in months. :)
     
  9. J0hn

    J0hn Phantom

    Messages:
    3,508
    Likes Received:
    9
    I know a digital forum that adopts a Hitler formula. This is related to Digital technology like Freeview, sky and cable aswell as Topuptv. Topuptv a recent venture has really put salt into the wound of a forum. It is so easy to get banned. Disagree once, you get warned, disagree twice, thats it, Exile. They are known as Digitalspy. trust me, for techno stuff, it is an ace place to be, but for having your own opinion, one must bite their tongue or pretend to agree. I call it Slaved opinion.

    On the positive side, a little easy on the fucking and the rotten bastard son of bitch, stuff and it might be a little easier on here. But taking away freedom of speech is a non starter. This is something that happens in prison. prison is like a sort of community or forum. If convicted, you have no human right entitlement and you cannot speak in court so I speak from experience.
     
  10. Elliott

    Elliott Banned

    Messages:
    400
    Likes Received:
    0
    hmm tempting hahaha. na i shouldnt
     
  11. Ambient Fraggle

    Ambient Fraggle Member

    Messages:
    195
    Likes Received:
    0
    yeah who are the mods here. I have not seen much of peace phoniex recentely!!

    I do like it here though, you dont feel as if you have people watching every post you make..............
     
  12. paulfreespirit

    paulfreespirit Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,368
    Likes Received:
    6
    we are the mods we are the mods we are we are we are the mods sorry quadraphenia flashback
     
  13. lithium

    lithium frogboy

    Messages:
    10,028
    Likes Received:
    17
    Aye, not a small point ... nowhere is perfect, but I can't stand forums which have an editorial policy and micromanage / edit / move / delete everything in sight which doesn't fit the rules.
     
  14. Lazuli Blue

    Lazuli Blue Member

    Messages:
    529
    Likes Received:
    0
    You're on about the chant ban for activists yeah?





    From Gagged magazine...

    In GAGGED 14 we brought you the news
    that the Met want to bring in in new laws

    that ban the wearing of masks at protests

    & to make the burning of flags a criminal

    offense. Now they want to outlaw

    ‘offensive chants’.

    Met Assistant Commissioner, Tarique

    Ghaffur wants powers to proscribe protest

    chants & slogans on placards, banners &

    headbands. The call comes as part of a

    review of the powers to police protests

    prompted by recent protests by Islamic

    extremists, but clearly such powers could

    also be used against protesters such as

    animal rights & anti-globalisation activists.

    The civil rights group Liberty said the

    powers would make the police "censors in

    chief".

    Chuffer of the Met stated, “What we are

    seeing in effect is a rise in the

    politicisation of middle England”. Again the

    State seem to be taking the approach of

    stifling public dissent rather than tackling

    the issues that give rise to the

    politicisation in the first place.

    At the moment ‘causing offense’ is not

    against the law. Who would be the judge of

    what would be classed as causing offense?

    Clearly what offends one will not

    necessarily offend another. Such proposed

    powers would clash with article 10 of the

    European Convention on Human Rights,

    which protects freedom of expression.

    These new demands for curbs on the right

    to protest come as the Lords rule that

    police had acted unlawfully in detaining a

    bus full of Iraq war protesters heading for

    a demonstration at RAF Fairford in March

    2003 & forcibly turning them back. Clearly

    the police are unable to keep a lid on

    protest with existing laws, so rather than

    being “Tough on the causes of crime”, Tony

    Blair’s mantra from the 1997 election, they

    think it easier to invent new laws to

    further erode civil liberty in this country.

     
  15. dapablo

    dapablo redefining

    Messages:
    2,701
    Likes Received:
    1
    I would of thought the law on incitement was adequate enough.
     
  16. Peace-Phoenix

    Peace-Phoenix Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,206
    Likes Received:
    5
    I'm alive don't worry!

    We are the mods, we are the mods, we are we are we are the mods!
     
  17. paulfreespirit

    paulfreespirit Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,368
    Likes Received:
    6
  18. usernom

    usernom Member

    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Which free speech irritates you the most, is it just people talking to and around you, or does it include films and all forms of artistic expression? If it does, would you ever protest against a film to get it banned? What films would you like to see binned? My top one would be Goal!
     
  19. TomDijon

    TomDijon Member

    Messages:
    446
    Likes Received:
    5
    eh, I had really bad experiences on here involving my saying we should be allowed to SPEAK OF banned members. After I posted on that I was banned. But it wasn't for that, it was because i had double posted accidentally once or twice... ha... but after a bit the whole site went down and they said that all banned members were welcome to rejoin. I still haven't been much on here since though. kinda left me a bit bitter that on a "free speach" forum I wasn't allowed to voice my opinion on allowing us to even talk about the issue of banning and those banned.
     
  20. lithium

    lithium frogboy

    Messages:
    10,028
    Likes Received:
    17
    Another way in which the UK forum here is a little different to the wider forums I think, I always thought it was a bit of an excessive policy that one. Moderators aren't obliged to answer such queries of course but threatening to ban people for merely questioning them?

    Nowhere is perfect, and there's no such thing as true free speech especially on the internet, it's a question of finding somewhere you feel is generally better than the alternatives.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice