i think circumcision for the sake of the jewish religion is fucking disgusting and yes, i do believe it is an infringement of male rights - especially if the male grows up to think for himself and realises that someone took part of him away for the sake of religious bullshit. however, if the foreskin is too tight which would lead to problems in cleaning, therefore future infection - then i completely agree. it's for the best. but i don't think any male should lose it because his parents believe it's the right thing to do as a jew. it's just WRONG.
I am down the middle when it comes to this subject. My partner hates that his parents decided to have him circumsized. I on the other had could care less if it was there or not. How can I miss something that I have never had before. And if I did have foreskin what is going to make it so different then not having extra skin? With the wonders of new cosmetics one might think that it could be reattached. If women can go and get theirs boobs enlarged then why can't a dude go and get a skin graph attached to his penis? Infringement that is hard to say. Cause most parents are doing it on the basis of religion or heritage of this nation.
nation being where you live, don't foregt people on the net come from all corners of the globe and unless its for religious reasons babies in the uk are not rountinly circumsized S
rambo was ritualy curcumcised with a rusty tin can top by the viet cong .......he led a raid on the prison what he escaped from to recover his foreskin still held by the enemy ...
I'm sorry you were lied to. The foreskin is attached to the head of the penis throughout childhood. They're not supposed to move. There is no cleaning involved with the foreskin of a child - no pulling back and washing underneath. To do so would be painful and cause infection. Your sons were completely normal and the doctor lied so that he could circumcise them and get the money from both the surgery itself and selling the foreskins to biomedical and/or cosmetics industries. I know you were doing what you thought was best. It was the doctor's job to give you impartial, truthful information and he flat-out lied. *hugs*
I can't really believe this thread is still active.... Circumcision is mutilation. -The foreskin is part of a very important area of a young man, and is often tight at birth. It loosens. -It IS painful. -It is not a hygiene issue. A man who is 'cut' and doesn't wash will get just as many infections as someone who isn't 'cut' and doesn't wash. Take showers. Problem solved. -If you had to snip a child's earlobes off at birth for a religion, you'd be considered barbaric. This is absolutely no different. It is needless torture that is only accepted due to people mindlessly accepting 'the way things have always been' , or being too politically correct to challenge the norm. People who circumcise their children are mutilating them. Period. You either made a mistake, or were knowingly doing your child permanent damage.
I suppose I am against it somewhat, but I voted no because I'm am personally not bothered by it. Uncut guys are a MAJOR turnoff for me. I just don't like the way it looks for some odd reason.
I think it totally is. Leave it up to the kid untill they get older! Heck, outside the US most places it's commun to be uncercumsized. I wish I wasn't, and will forever hold it against my mom. Yeah, some say"I wouldn't want it anyway", but what about everyone else who wants the choice? I also agree it's mutalation...may just have to try cutting my mom's earlobe off for that>:grrr(wont do it, but I think it'de be a fare trade off)
i guess i can see how it would be a violation of childrens rights but i was circumcised and am quite satisfied with myself. personally i think the circumcised penis is beautiful whereas uncut it kind of looks like a dog, which makes sense, but it's weird to me. all in all i guess i didn't add to this at all except to say a cut cock is a hot cock. but if you can love me right i don't care either way