I think of dogs like guys and cats like girl. You can smack a dog up side the head and he'll still want to be pals. Just like a guy can hit a friend but they'll still be friends. Smack a cat around and buddy that's it. Smack your g/f around and likely you'll be minus a g/f or at least not getting any for awhile. Plus, call a dog and no matter what he's doing he'll come a-running. Like a guy. Call a cat and it'll show up if it feels like it. Like a girl. Give a dog something good to eat and their jazzed. I put some leftover chicken in my dogs bowl and he was so stoked. I mean he likes most any kind of people food and this was MEAT, oh joy. I put a piece of chicken in the cats bowl. She shows up, sniffs the chicken and then looks at me like "is that the best you can do?" and walks away. Treat a guy to a meal at Burger King and he's happy. Treat a girl to a meal at Burger King and she'll be like "Burger King? Aren't I worth more than that?" There's only 1 thing girls have in common with dogs--they like it doggy style, so I'll give them that.
Cat style, yes that my good sir, is the best, but I seriously hate my grandmas cat. She has held like a 10 year grudge on me...I put this sticky shit on her hair and it had to be shaved off, so yah she has never liked me after that...
I've always felt numbers and letters also had gender property... as well as certain appliances, furnishings, and alcohols... cars too.
Black Bic from the liquor store - $2 A gram of some chronic from your buddy - $15 New glass pipe from the local headshop - $20 Hearing a personal story or insight from rangerdanger - Priceless
Maybe you should learn french? I never understood how they thought that the grand canyon was masculine though... neways. I always thought that men would be more accurately described as cats. we're pretty solitary, teritorial and self interested (by and large, i'm just noticing some trends and evolutionary baggage, i don't want to imply that every man is a jerk). A 'herd' of cats is really just a bunch of cats that aren't too bothered by each other's presence at the moment. They're not very social animals and their life revolves around gratifying it's primal urges to hunt, eat, mate, and sleep. They will show affection, but usually only because it's in their best interests, and if they find a better deal they will leave it. women on the other hand have always been more social, this is why most convesations with the fairer sex revolves around people. Traditionally (and i'm talking back in the monkey days for you non-bible folk) women would tend the family and gather food while the men hunted. This meant that over time the women who were the most social were the most successful. Dogs are pack animals. they have a duty to the pack above all else. They will sacrifice everything in order to provide for the pack. Most of a dog's psyche is based around this approach and it's of extreme importance to the dog where it ranks. this is more womanly than manly. And if you think that women will not let themselves be beaten because they think it's best for the family, you have never watched day time television... my two cents neways.
Only when it's in his best interest. Man is inheriently self-interested. A sporting event or a war is just a 'civilized' way of proving dominence, what's more male than that?
I don't see the "men aren't pack animals" analogy and am 100% with ranger on this one. You could tag "only when its in his best interest" to any statement to twist it your way, but that doesn't make it true.