Attack on Iran - IMMINENT!

Discussion in 'America Attacks!' started by skip, Mar 11, 2007.

  1. skip

    skip Founder Administrator

    Messages:
    12,914
    Likes Received:
    1,897
    When I started this forum, many years ago, I had a feeling that after 9/11 America, led by G.W. Bush was gonna pretty much have a field day attacking anyone they could blame for 9/11 or terrorism.

    We haven't been disappointed yet, have we? And after all these years, the US has still yet to STOP attacking other countries. As long as Bush is in charge we can expect more aggression, more military interventions, more death and destruction, and more hatred directed at America due to these acts.

    And now it looks like Iran is on the verge of being our next victim. And Bush isn't gonna stop at taking out Iran's nuclear program. This is because the real goal is to oust the government and gain access to Iran's oil, one way or another.

    This is to benefit the Oil Companies who've conspired with Bush & Cheney to get control of mideast oil supplies so they can continue to profit from oil rather than seek alternatives that wouldn't necessitate war after war.

    And now reports are circulating that the US is moving a LOT of air assets from Europe to bases in the mideast. This is probably the last thing to be done before the attack.

    It's highly unlikely those forces would be moved unless an attack was imminent because of the costs involved and the burden it places on the support structure on the mideast bases which are already pretty damn busy with the two ongoing wars that WILL NEVER END AS LONG AS BUSH IS IN POWER!

    So get ready ppl, cause most pundits say when Iran is attacked, that is the official start of WWIII. I won't even go into the various scenarios that are likely to play out once it starts, but NONE OF THEM ARE GOOD.

    So enjoy this relative peace now, cause when WWIII breaks out, all you young people are gonna get drafted whether you like it or not. And then we will REALLY need to defend ourselves.

    This is what Bush & Co. have really been waiting for. ALL OUT WAR with Iran.

    There's gonna be a LOT OF BUTTONS pressed on that day...

    [​IMG]
     
  2. shaggie

    shaggie Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,504
    Likes Received:
    19
  3. shaggie

    shaggie Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,504
    Likes Received:
    19
  4. Pressed_Rat

    Pressed_Rat Do you even lift, bruh?

    Messages:
    33,925
    Likes Received:
    2,465
    It actually goes a lot higher than Bush. Bush simply does as he's told, like the puppet he is. Keep in mind, this was all planned back in the late 90s by the Project for the New American Century (PNAC). What we see unfolding is part of a long-term agenda. It's unlikely that the next president will change anything, as this is all coming from the top. Hillary is certainly not going to save us, and neither is any of the other hand-selected candidates that stand a chance of winning.
     
  5. Carlfloydfan

    Carlfloydfan Travel lover

    Messages:
    7,176
    Likes Received:
    45
    this could lead to world war 3, I am sure, it is scary. a recent reading I read stated this was planned as far back as the late 1870s, Albert Pike among the people.

    not these exact events obviously...but the basic outline of each of the three world wars was stated (as what must happen). two of which have occured obviously, by design, not naturally.
     
  6. Higherthanhell

    Higherthanhell Banned

    Messages:
    1,064
    Likes Received:
    0
  7. gardener

    gardener Realistic Humanist

    Messages:
    10,027
    Likes Received:
    2
    I am not sure how they are going to pull it off with the US military stretched to the breaking point. But most of the elitists having been pushing for this for quite some time.
     
  8. skip

    skip Founder Administrator

    Messages:
    12,914
    Likes Received:
    1,897
    They are thinking this is ONLY going to be an air war. Yeah right.

    They have little defense for the missiles that will rain down in their hundreds on US bases in Iraq, Afghanistan and across the middle east. Not to mention Israel.

    BTW, the Iranians haven't just been conducting war games simulating an attack on their country by the US and Israel, they now have their entire military on 24/7 WAR FOOTING as we speak. They are one step from pushing their buttons right now, as is the US.

    Too bad the Iranians don't have a chance as they are COMPLETELY SURROUNDED on 4 sides by US bases and the US fleet. The assets we have in the area is probably WAY MORE than we have defending the USA at this moment.

    Oh, and you can be SURE those US planes coming from Europe brought their NUKES with them...

    Can you spell Apocalypse Now?
     
  9. skip

    skip Founder Administrator

    Messages:
    12,914
    Likes Received:
    1,897
    Oh, and I nearly forgot to mention that the US supposedly has a big time defector, the former Iranian deputy minister of defense, who is squealing his head off about the capabilities and weaknesses of the Iranian defense system.

    My guess is it's either a ploy to lower Iranian morale and make them question what the US knows or perhaps this guy is a plant to throw off the US attack entirely.

    If indeed they have inside info, it will probably only match what inside info the Iranians have on the US. They've had moles in the US military & gov't for decades.
     
  10. Pressed_Rat

    Pressed_Rat Do you even lift, bruh?

    Messages:
    33,925
    Likes Received:
    2,465
    They, as in the public. The people behind this know it will be a full-scale war, and that's what they want. They aren't all as dumb as they look, just psychopathic. They are simply alluding to the public it will only be an air war, but they know better than that. There is not a doubt that an attack on Iran will be the start of a third world war, which is exactly what the neocons and their elitist handlers want. This will no doubt also coincide with a reinstatement of the draft.

    As I stated before, to get the people behind the invasion of Iran, they are going to have to use some sort of a pretext, whether it be a Gulf of Tonkin type event, or an attack on one of the US bases in Iraq, which will be blamed on Iran. There is no limit to the tricks these people have up their sleeves.
     
  11. skip

    skip Founder Administrator

    Messages:
    12,914
    Likes Received:
    1,897
    PR, it won't have to be an attack on Iraq. The US has in place a contingency plan for after another 9/11 type attack on the US. As soon as it happens, Iran gets blamed and WWIII begins. It was all set in stone since b4 the US invasion of Iraq.

    Tell me, just how hard would it be for a clandestine attack on the US by it's own operatives?

    Oh wait, that's right there's 9/11, anthrax, assassinations of JFK, RFK, MLK, etc.

    Been there, done that, another's no problem...
     
  12. skip

    skip Founder Administrator

    Messages:
    12,914
    Likes Received:
    1,897
    Know what, I've been thinking lately that the REAL reason we haven't had another 9/11 yet is that the US has TOLD IRAN that another attack on US soil would result in an invasion of Iran.

    That just might've made Iran and the jihadists think twice about another direct attack on the USA. After all if the US were to invade or nuke Iran as a result, it would definitely setback their goal of liberating the mideast from western influence, no?

    In fact I can think of no other logical explanation as to why there hasn't been another 9/11 yet, other than PR's assertion that WE DID IT TO OURSELVES...
     
  13. Pressed_Rat

    Pressed_Rat Do you even lift, bruh?

    Messages:
    33,925
    Likes Received:
    2,465
    The so-called jihadists have very little ability to attack us within the states, let alone with anything on the order of a massive-scale attack like 9/11, which could only have been pulled off by the intelligence agencies. The jihadists are simply being used as patsies to take the fall for what is in reality a massive scam being perpetrated on the people of the world by the Elite.

    I also have to question Ahmadinejad's role in all this. Seems awfully convenient for the US and Israel (the neocons) that this man is shooting his mouth off with one of the biggest standing armies in the world right next store just waiting to pounce at any moment. We know that Saddam was a CIA asset. We know bin Laden is/was a CIA asset and close business partners with the Bushes via the Carlyle Group. How do we know Ahmadinejad isn't part of the game -- knowingly or unknowingly? I honestly have a hard time believing he's not just a puppet as well.

    These people specialize in deception.
     
  14. Carlfloydfan

    Carlfloydfan Travel lover

    Messages:
    7,176
    Likes Received:
    45
    like I said before earlier in this thread, as early as 1870 with Pike in what i have found recently. Some even state as early as the French Revolution (which was orchestrated by bugeousise types similar in fashion to elites others talk about here.) People who stood to gain regardless of the outcome in other words. And there are a certian few who stand to gain regardless of what happens currently with Iran.

    The Spanish/American war of 1898, the fall of the czars in 1917...was when things started to fall into place, the assination of arch bishop of Austria, leading to world war 1, all orchestrated by people behind the scenes. Not just coinsidence.
     
  15. skip

    skip Founder Administrator

    Messages:
    12,914
    Likes Received:
    1,897
    No, I'm referring to the SPECIFIC plan, that says where the troops should go, which military hardware is required, etc. etc. A COMPLETE plan for the invasion. It's already been there for years.
     
  16. Carlfloydfan

    Carlfloydfan Travel lover

    Messages:
    7,176
    Likes Received:
    45
    aahhh yes my bad, sorry.
     
  17. Alaskan

    Alaskan Hip Forums Supporter HipForums Supporter

    Messages:
    678
    Likes Received:
    0
    Skip: I in total agreement with you as the plans were set into place a couple of presidents back. I wonder if the "shock and awe" bombardment of Bagdad. Didn't shock them that much, I guess...
    Since the air strikes we've had troops on the ground longer than our involvement in WW II. Is it just me or is the military trying to "heavily armed police".
    As mentioned in previous post, we are stretched too thin to wage another military action, anywhere. Geez, we cant even secure our own borders. Or control crime in our cities.
    War is a very, very dirty business, we've seen what happens when you try to keep it clean and letting the press do an indepth story everytime a squad goes on patrol.
    Hopefully the house and the senate can put a muzzle on P.O.T.U.S. before he gets us into full out shooting war with nukes........
     
  18. relaxxx

    relaxxx Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,544
    Likes Received:
    767
    If it was a long term plan of the US military to attack Iran then the Iraq was a big part of this long term plan. Unfortunately for the US the Iraq was a huge fiasco and a massive failure. The US does not have global national support let alone American public support. Their debts are too high and their forces stretched too thin. The lies of the Iraq war have cost the US a huge toll in all aspects, financial and publicly, their credibility is completely and utterly shot to hell. To launch an attack on Iran will be a fatal mistake.

    The most unfortunate thing about this may be that Iran actually is a viable threat but after attacking Iraq based on lies they completely screwed their plan. Iraq was no threat at all, ten tears of UN sanctions had completely dismantled their military. Words can not describe how huge of a fuck up this move was!

    So if Iraq was a step, and a test war of sorts, it was a failure. This was a country of around 25 Million people with more religious diversity than Iran. Iraq was about 60% shi’a vs sunni mixture. Iran on the other hand is 60 million people who are far more united, almost 90% Shi’a. If you think Iraq went bad… Iran will be an absolute disaster, an absolute freakin’ bloodbath!!

    If the US military has any sense left at all, they certainly know this type of move is pure suicide. I don’t see any way they could send troops into that country whatsoever. An air attack it this point in the game is also rather pointless and counter productive. The US needs support from their fellow nations. A cold war approach would make the most sense. Regroup, contain the situation, try to get some UN friends back on board point your missiles and wait for the other guys to fuck up for a change! The US needs to get its head out of the fucking OIL gutter! Start making moves for the right reasons instead of greed. Oil is a crutch, we need to get over it and move on to clean energy not destroy our world fighting over it. Get rid of these greedy oil puppet Presidents and get some bastards in charge with the balls to do what right for the people. Tell the middle east to keep their filthy oil.
     
  19. sentient

    sentient Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    1
    The USA aint gonna attack Iran - they love Iran - they just destroyed two of Irans sworn enemies - What do ya think they were doing in Iraq ? - this is just payback time - the USA delivered Iran what it wanted - now the USA wants what Iran to pay up and part of that payment is no development of nuclear weapons - this aint gonna result in an attack this is just what politics is - theyre bullshitting ya - theyre the best of friends behind the scenes but front of stage they make out like theyre bitter enemies WHY WOULD THEY DO THAT ???? Intelligence agents in the East - who but a sworn enemy of the usa could get agents into most arabic businesses and gov't HQ's - ANY MONEY - ANY MONEY YOU LIKE - says It will be muslims funded by Iran that are in charge of Iraq within three or 4 years
    On the other hand I say bomb Iran into the stoneage and lets have surety there will be world peace as once them idiots are knocked out - you would get a hell of a lot more peace in the world - Ignoring the fact of course that Britain and the USA dont want world peace - why would the two biggest arms dealers on the planet want world peace????
    _____________
     
  20. Higherthanhell

    Higherthanhell Banned

    Messages:
    1,064
    Likes Received:
    0
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice