Groundbreaking New 9/11 Film "September Clues"

Please do. Watch the videos. It shouldn't take you any more than an hour. I think each segment is like 10 minutes.

 

I didn't really think they used missles either,but after watching these videos it's clear that it wasn't a plane,well not a normal one.

 

I read your posts and I always laugh at them. Because you literally say the same thing everytime. Back up your opinions with some answers and maybe people will listen to you.

 

It was certainly not a normal plane. I had assumed that it was a remotely-controlled one. The technology has existed for decades to control a plane from the ground. I believe (and this may be wrong) that there was a prototype called Global Hawk. And that's what the public has been allowed to see. Technology is lightyears ahead of that behind the scenes.

Now, a question for you, Rat. Why missiles? What would be the point. It's late, but I'll watch the videos tomorrow. I'm just curious as to why you think missiles would be necessary when, as I said, planes could do the job just as well (as far as I understood).

 

Yeah, you really need to watch the videos.

The most common alternative theory from the beginning is that the "planes" were remote controlled. This was always a strong possibility (and the ONLY possibility, considering it was actually planes that struck the buildings) in my mind and many other's, but it has always been just that: a theory. There is no more proof of this than there is for the "official" story of "Muslim hijackers," who couldn't even fly a Cesna.

There were several eyewitnesses that day who reported to see and/or hear a missile, and I don't think these people's accounts should be ignored simply because the media decided to bombard us with "official" accounts of it being a plane (according to script of course). Especially when all the footage we have been shown of the "planes" hitting the towers has proven beyond all reasonable doubt to be fake, and if you watch these videos, you will see that to be the case.

Why did they decide to use missiles? How would I know? It's like the question about what happened to the passengers. You could just as easily ask why did they use planes instead of missiles (if you believe the "official" alternative theory as promoted by the 'Loose Change' crowd). Nobody knows all the answers. We can only go based on what we DO know according to the evidence. If we want to get into speculation, one reason might be that it would be a heck of a lot easier (and much more precise) to use a missile, rather than use remote controlled planes, where there is a much greater chance of error. The same goes for the Pentagon, where it would have been nearly IMPOSSIBLE for a jet to crash into the building flying so low to the ground at such high speed.

 

Literally Impossible to fly a plane at that low of altitude with such accuracy, definately an EXTREMELY trained pilot or a missle. Light posts that would have been taken out by a plane werent taken out and they didnt even find wing debri. The hole in the pentagon was like 70 ft wide and a Boeing 747's Wingspan is 151 ft.....

 

There's no way a plane hit the Pentagon, I know that for sure. Do they expect us to believe that air space isn't protected? I mean, if you enter the air space of the Parliament House in Canberra, Australia, you will be prompted by a computer to enter a code. If you don't in a very short time, you will be shot down by homing missiles. This is in Australia, for the Parliament House. But at the center of US Military Intelligence (as far as we're told), nothing. Fly right over, we don't care. Bullshit.

 

The truth about it?
America bombed too many countrys, as soon as it gets hit all the shit comes out

 

Shit, you were right. Those videos are faked. But of course, the coverup is never done skillfully, because it doesn't need to be. Throw in a silhouette that's roughly the shape of a plane, and people will ignore the detail and go for the message. The TV says a plane hit it, and there's the video. Nevermind looking at it carefully. They were definitely covering up something. Whether it was a missile, who knows? But I don't see a lot of other options.

 

Great videos.

 

Somethings fucked up about 9/11...

Let me tell you die-hard supporters of the no-government involvement theory something.... There are WAY too many discrepancies in the official 9/11 conclusions (i.e. hundreds +). This is not "chance," chance is something that happens once. When so many damn things dont add up, and will not be officially adressed, this is not a matter of chance.

I definitely think the government had some invovlement. Too many things dont add up, waayyy to many...

 

What? No! It was Muslims with boxcutters! They planned it in a cave, I heard it on the news!

 

Indeed.

Its fucked up what the upper echelons of the gov't can get away with...

I'm reading a book called The Terror Conspiracy: Deception, 9/11, and the Loss of Liberty.

Pretty messed up this stuff is. Great read too, sources listed, and written by a world-renowned author. Def. recommended reading.

 

haha :& Thats a good one

 

People have a shallow-minded stereotypical view of terror groups, as if they are a bunch of dunderheads in caves that don't know what they are doing. That mentality is part of the reason why people let their guard down and get hit. These groups have gotten very skilled and resourceful. They're forced to be clever and resourceful since they don't have the budget and equipment that a government has. They're able to run circles around those in the government who have become the real dunderheads.

.

 

Look, the western intelligence agencies and the "global terror network" are one and the same. Al-Qaeda is a CIA/MI6 creation, and the name comes directly from a CIA file on the Mujahadeen, which the US was funding to go against the Soviets in the late 80's. Al-Qaeda translates to "the Base" (in reference to the database), and in certain parts of the Middle East it is slang for using the toilet. How convenient the "evil doers" named themselves after a bodily function.

But it's no surprise because bin Laden was brought to the US in the mid 80's under the alias Tim Osman, where he was groomed for his boogeyman role.... just like the CIA visited him in the summer of '01 at the hosptial in Dubai.... just like the head of the Pakistani ISI (a CIA-MI6-Mossad front), General Mahmoud Ahmad, who was meeting with officials in Washington on the morning of 9/11, wired Mohammed Atta $100,000 dollars the day before these attacks.

But those behind all this have perfect knowledge of the human psyche. They know that if you don't have an enemy, you need to create one in order to keep the people in a state of chronic fear, clamoring to the government to save them from this contrived outside threat they believe to be real. Governments need wars to remain legitimate, or else the people might actually wake up and decide to think for themselves and perhaps realize they've been had.

Because of fear and the belief that government is savior, the people are dependent on its oppressors, much like the battered wife is dependent on her abuser.

 

Well, actually, the newsmedia has stated almost ad nauseum that Al-Qaeda is based in Afghani caves. The official story also has them learning to fly at puddle-jumping schools in Florida, where their instructors reported they couldn't even fly a Cesna. It has them leaving Korans laying around in hotel rooms, and even a strip joint (see any confliction there?) So, they sound pretty clueless to me. But that's okay, since they didn't have to do anything but take the fall.

 

Have you ever seen a boxcutter? The fucking blade is like 1/2 an inch long!!! That's TOTALLY deadly! If I got cut by one of those I might bleed to death in the next 72 hours!

 

Even less if you couldn't find a band-aid!

 

Indeed. It is known that the majority of the planners, financiers, and hijackers involved in 9/11 had some form of higher education, if not a degree (several in a field of engineering). Angelheadedhipster once provided a link to a study that showed that most "9/11 conspiracy theorists" have no more than a highschool education.