Rothschild Global Warming Handbook Accompanies Hyped 7/7 Live Earth Concert

http://www.jonesreport.com/articles/050707_rothschild_global.html




Rothschild Global Warming Handbook Accompanies Hyped 7/7 Live Earth Concert


Jones Report | July 5, 2007

Efforts to hype the 7/7 Live Earth global warming concert have gone so far as to include an official companion, The Live Earth Global Warming Survival Handbook-- all the more interesting because it is written by David de Rothschild.​

​

David Mayer de Rothschild is the youngest child (born 1978) of Sir Evelyn de Rothschild, of the British wing of the Rothschild banking family. ​

​

​

​

A brief video interview with Rothschild about the book appears here. ​

From Wikipedia: David de Rothschild, founded Adventure Ecology whose stated goal is to promote a greater connection with the natural world through a series of high profile expeditions. The first mission in the series 'Top of the world' Mission 1 expedition began on March 4, 2006​

​

While David de Rothschild endures his extreme sports adventure series in the name of global warming, his 77 Essential Skills to Stop Climate Changes calls for ordinary people to limit outward behavior and even work at home. As Brendan O'Neill put it in his article The Planet's Burning. Let's Party!:​

The most irritating thing about this book is that it is based, not on scientific investigation, but on the quarterlife crisis of some long-haired middle-class rich boy. The author is David de Rothschild – and yes, he's a member of the super-wealthy Rothschild banking family. These are the kind of people now telling the rest of us to live in little houses and wear £5 jumpers.



​

Via green solutions, the son of the prestigious banking family also advocates online banking and perhaps a cashless society (for the environment). He also promotes the green chic of compact cities and urban living. ​

​

​

​

 

Hardly surprising.

 

Makes sense, the super elite wont have their healthy private natural land to live in if the whole planet is fucked.

 

But the reality is that it has absolutely NOTHING to do with the environment at all. The general public is being lead to believe that they are the ones contributing to global warming, when no such scientific evidence proves this to be the case. Besides, most of the C02 that comes from sources other than natural ones is largely from their factories and corporations. The people who consume far more natural resources than the average person (ie. Al Gore) say we must change our lifestyles to save the earth, when they own multiple mansions and fly all around the globe in their private jets. Do you think they plan on changing their lifestyles anytime soon? Of course not, because they know it's a hoax but have been selected to push this agenda for their masters behind the scenes.

The entire sham which is manmade global warming is nothing more than a ruse used to bring about the necessary changes needed to usher in their new system of tyrannical control. For decades at their private meetings the Elite have discussed the limited effectiveness of war in controlling the public through fear, so they sought to come up with another way of "uniting" the population through the promulgated threat of impending environmental catastrophe. After all, global problems require global solutions, and when you have a global problem, global bodies such as the UN will be deemed necessary to step in and solve this problem with new sovereignty-eroding international laws and regulations, as well as a global tax. This would coincide with the complete reengineering of society and the way people would be required to live as outlined in Agenda 21.

As it is, the modern environmental movement is merely a wing of the Club of Rome, and receives massive funding from people like the Rockefellers and their tax-exempt foundations. Under the guise of environmentalism, the West has been deindustrialized, and the wealth that once belonged to these prospering nations is now shipped abroad to the third-world where no such environmental laws exist. This is all part of the socialist-collectivist agenda which is the New World Order.

 

Rothchilds #1!!!!

 

seems the fucking hypocrite can't even put this online for people to download. they don't even try anymore and people seem to eat it up.

so are people really that dense? really its just common sense. Common sense says this is a load of crap and the hypocrisy is clear as day.

He just wants us to make the sacrifices while he and his buddy gore can fly in their private jets to one of their multiple ultra consuming mansions (which uses more in a week than a family does in a year) packed with suvs. So they can cut down more trees to print their propaghanda and use more trucks to ship the nonsense throughout the nation. all while telling us to live small. fuck that. or at least the way he preaches. cause he ain't practicin it!

 

I don't agree with the above for two major reasons (and many minor ones).

1. The science of climate change is sound. The earths atmosphere is a closed system. The chemical composition held within creates the conditions in the closed system. Change the composition and you change the conditions. Simple. I don't know how people can't understand such a simple concept.

If you have trouble you may try an experiment. Close your garage door. Turn you car on. Note the change...

2. I have been an environmental activist for twelve years. I have met founders of Greenpeace and the most prominent environmentalists in Australia. To suggest that these people are in anyway are working for the NWO is absurd.

Most of the major environment NGO's (the WWF is a notable exception and recieve donations from petrochemical multinationsals and coincidentally have been soft on oil and climate change in general...) have policies of not accepting corporate donations.

To have spent the amount of time inside the environmental movement as I have I can tell you the most stalwart warriors protecting this planet are environmentalists.

Only recently has the "elite" jumped on the climate change bandwagon. For years the "elite" have sabotaged every attempt to deal with climate change. It seems at last they have accepted the reality that even rich people will suffer when this planet goes to shit.

Finally.

The sociopolitical effect of humanity switching to RENEWABLE energy will directly and absolutely undermine centralised control by any type of oppressive regime.

With all due respect I suggest that people who think climate change is some conspiracy need to take a break from reading about the NWO, learn some science and do some research on this subject.

Cheers
J

 

The science of climate change is sound in that the most scientific evidence shows global warming to be cyclical in nature, corresponding primarily with increased sunspot activity. As the earth is warming up, so is Mars, Jupiter and Saturn. Now if you have any evidence of SUV's on Mars or Jupiter, please let me know.

The evidence shows that CO2 rise lags behind a rise in temperature by literally hundreds of years, meaning that warming leads to an increase in CO2 and not the other way around. And even if we were to belive that humans are playing a significant role in this warming process, or that greenhouse gases are even the cause of this, it must be understood that the amount of C02 given off by human activity is virtually nothing compared to natural sources like volcanoes and the ocean.

We can look back to historical records and see there were periods when the Earth was much warmer than it is today, and this always followed periods of cooling. This is part of an ongoing cycle, though people are being lead to believe that the earth has never experienced such a thing before in all its ancient history. They depend on people not to question these things, because generally the public never questions anything they're told to believe from "official" sources.

The public, with the media's help, is being mislead to believe that global warming is manmade, and when a lie is told enough times it eventually becomes fact in most people's minds. The truth is that MANY scientists in the field of climatology have come forward saying that global warming isn't manmade, but rather cyclical. Many of these scientists even sat on the board of the IPCC and had their findings excluded from the report, despite having their names included among the list of participants. This has already lead to numerous lawsuits and shows the political -- not scientific -- agenda of the IPCC and UN.

As I stated in my previous post, the environemtal movement was formed in the late 60's by the Club of Rome, with money from pro-eugenics families like the Rockefellers and Rothschilds. To this day most of the big environmental organizations receive funding from the many Elite-controlled tax-exempt foundations like the Rockefeller Bros. Fund and the Ford Foundation.

There are alternative forms of energy that exist, but are being suppressed by the same people who are forcing this global warming nonsense down our throats, telling us we must change the way we lives our lives, or else risk the imminent destruction of the planet. This is called fear-mongering, and you need to look back on history and understand how governments throughout time have used fear to push agendas which the public have no idea about.

And I never said most environmentalists are working for the New World Order. I beleive most of these people truly believe in what they're doing, unaware of the fact that they're being used and lead down a rabbit hole. There is no doubt damage is being done to the earth, and there are legitimate environmental concerns. However, the issue of the environment is being exploited by people who have a totally different agenda.

 

This is an interesting idea. I'm gonna go try it. I'll post the results in a few hours, when I'm done.

 

PressedRat, I like your style.

But I gotta say you are really wrong on this mate. Although you are spot on that the elite have suppressed many clean renewable technologies.

Whilst maybe the elite is manipulating this crisis to further their ends, human caused climate change is real.

Check your sources. I know FIRST HAND some of what you wrote is blatantly wrong.

The real conspiracy under all this and one of the most important issues in the world is the control of power production. Just think for a second the power that would be in the "peoples" hands if we all had renewable energy at our fingertips and were independant of any big oil, coal, nuclear companies for our power supply.

Cheers
J

 

I was joking!

Nalencer! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!

Cheers
J

 

he's being sarcastic

 

OOPS

Looks like Rothschild screwed up big time!

Not only was Live Earth a flop, but he claimed that Jupiter and Saturn are Closer To Sun Than Earth!

Listen while you can, Rothschilds agents are already trying to remove this interveiw from other websites:

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/july2007/090707closertosun.htm

stupid moron. Maybe he'll be disowned from the family now

 

can anyone save that clip to repost it when it is taken down?

 

and remember, there was a global cooling scare in the 70's, where some even wanted to melt ice caps to keep the earth warm.. This eventually died after heavy criticism from the public.

And now the man made global warming movement is dying as celebrities like Madonna continue to own 6 SUVs and other idiots can't even get basic facts right. How much CO2 do some of these artists use for concerts and tours? Think about that

...exactly!

now don't fucking lecture me on how to live. I treat the earth far better than Gore, Maddona, Rothschild, ect!!

 

I can save a copy of this and repost it, if you think it's necessary, but do you really think it's gonna be taken off that website?

 

Ah... yeah, I was going along with the joke.

Anyway I was gonna leave this thread alone but this morning, as I read the paper I came across an article about the climate sceptics and the sunspot explanation and such.

I thought I'd just chuck it in here.

Heres a link and beneath the article.

http://www.smh.com.au/news/environment/climate-sceptic-directors-missing-details/2007/07/13/1183833724424.html


The director of a controversial documentary about global warming which aired on ABC television last night was put on the spot over a simple graph which was to meant show how global warming was linked to sun spot activity.

In his documentary, The Great Climate Swindle, director Martin Durkin used a graph produced by acclaimed English climatologist Hubert Lamb to show that the earth's temperatures for hundreds of years had risen and fallen in keeping with sun spot activity.

He argued possible causes for rising temperature had not been given proper consideration by scientists and those arguing global warming was caused by human-induced greenhouse gas emissions.

But the graph's two lines stopped around 1980, just the time when temperatures rose - without a corresponding rise in sunspot activity - and science began to show concern about human-induced global warming.

Mr Durkin also said a warmer period some hundreds of years ago, referred to as the mediaeval warm period, was even hotter than temperatures today.

Pressed by interviewer Tony Jones on why he did not avail himself of the authoritative Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) graphs available since 1990 - which have shown astronomical rising temperatures and slowing sunspot activity, Mr Durkin said they were unreliable.

"You can't just get a graph produced by Hubert Lamb on the various statistics and then add another bit of line to it," Mr Durkin told the program.

"In terms of the error bars of that graph, it is absolutely absurd to quibble on when it finishes in terms of tens of dates."

Mr Durkin took exception to questions over why he referred, in his program, to temperatures matching sunspot activity "now", when the graph ended around 1980.

This was despite IPCC reports in 1990, 1995, 2001 and 2007 showing steady increases in temperatures.

"I'll tell you exactly why we didn't use one of those. They were superseded by graphs which eliminated the mediaeval warm period," he said.

"This is what (his opponents) do. They'll fix on something which is a moot point.

"Personally, I think it's perfectly legitimate to refer to the late 20th century as now, just as the IPCC did."

 

And? What's your point? I've never even heard of Martin Durkin. Refuting him does not refute everyone who says that global warming is not man-made.

 

What about all the factories sending deadly chemicals into the rivers and oceans? That should be halted shouldn't it. That a doctrine of the Magna Carta.

 

No one said pollution doesn't harm the planet. But it's certainly not at the point of causing any major upheaval, and it is not causing global warming.