Racial Relationships and the bestiality therein

A sexual encounter between a human and a chimpanzee would, obviously, be considered bestiality. The genetic difference between the two is 1.6% It follows that the amount of bestiality involved in a person having sex with a being that had an 0.8% genetic difference from themselves would be 50% (because a genetic difference of 0.8% is half that 0f the 1.6% between humans and chimps).

(Note: all percentages featured below have been rounded to first decimal point)

Going by the same logic, the amount bestiality involved in a relationship between an Englishmen and a German (who have a genetic distance of 0.002%) would be: 0.1%

• Between a Finn and an Englishmen (who have a genetic difference of 0.005%): 0.3% bestiality
• Between a Italian & Englshmen (who have a genetic difference of 0.007%): 0.4% bestiality
• Betweena Japanese person and an Englishmen (genetic dif. of 0.061): 3.8% bestiality
• Between a Filipino and Englishmen (genetic dif. of 0.074%): 4.6% bestiality
• Between a Thai person and an Englishmen (genetic dif. of 0.081%): 5.1% bestiality
• Between Bantu (African) and Englishmen (genetic dif. of 0.108%): 6.7% bestiality
• Between an Australian Aboriginal (Australiod) and an Englishmen (genetic dif. of 0.122%): 7.6% bestiality
• Between a Nigerian and an Englishmen (genetic dif. of 0.133%): 8.3% bestiality.

 

Erm. And?

Who wants to shag a chimp when there are girls.

 

people are just people... we arent classed as a different psecies therefor fucking one another isnt bestiality... and im hoping and praying that this isnt some backasswards way of supporting racism

 

It sure bloody sounds like it.. this is the kind of research the Nazi scientists would condone.. "scientific" "evidence" that "proves" white superiority... or at least can be construed as so.
notice how all his examples are of Englishmen - presumably here he means Godfearing White English Upperclass Men.

 

Yes we are people, but people differ. It's like saying we are all animals, and neglecting that animals differ greatly. Which are more accurate: classifications or facts.

In response to, Quoth the Raven: I don't believe whites are superior, and the only reason I compared them with Englishmen is because they were the only whites featured in the article I read.

 

HIV was transferred to humans after some guy in Africa had sex with a chimp.

 

There is less variation between the DNA of two human beings from opposite ends of the earth than there is between the DNA of two gorillas from the same African rain forest.

 

I wouldn't say this is any more racist than saying an africans skin is darker than a europeans.

its interesting that these figures are based on a chimps relation to us, and not the 'average' generitc difference between us and another species in the animalia kingdom. If you were to take the average difference between our human DNA and the DNA of any random animal, you'd find the percentage of beastiality between humans of various descent would be far lower.

 

so who is the human and who is the animal?
This study is retarded

 

ur an idiot. seriously. ur thread is ridiculous. ur an inbred dumbass. get a life.

 

based on this logic, sex with a lizard would be like 215615% bestiality, which doesn't really make sense because it's either bestiality or it isn't.

 

I think this is pretty ridiculous since we're still the same species as someone with a completely different heritage than ours, and I'm sure there's some junk science involved with numbers as large as these.

However, I find it interesting that what most people think he's saying is, "Beastiality is wrong, therefore interracial sex is wrong," as opposed to, "Interracial sex is okay, therefore beastiality is okay too." Because this could really be interpreted both ways.