A scientific View on Homosexuality

Homosexuality is very obviously a genetic mistake, but what could be the cause? To examine what might cause such a crippling mutation, one must first discover the reason for such a biological failure.

Could homosexuality be caused by faulty genes? Surely, since homosexuality flies in the face of evolution, which is accepted in the scientific community as a proven theory, it could not possibly be caused by healthy genes. In stead, it might be caused by genes that are sort of "mixed up". Instead of having normal, male or female genes, someone might have male genes that produce the hormones that would attract the individual to other men. However, there is one problem with this hypothesis: If homosexuality is the fault of faulty genes, then how are these genes being transmitted?

Since homosexuals will only want to have homosexual sex, they will most likely die with no heir, wiping history clean of their family's imperfect genes. One might argue that since some homosexuals come to the realization that their actions are against the natural order of things they will, in turn, have heterosexual sex, propagating their defunct DNA. However, as “acceptance” of their “life style” spreads, this explanation grows weaker, and it doesn't explain why there are so many of them to begin with.

However, there is another explanation. Desire for one sex or another is not only affected by the hormones a person produces, but also the shape of their brains. It has been shown that many gay men have brain structures more similar to women than to men. Therefore, the explanation is clear. Human fetuses begin life as a female. Left uninterrupted, any fetus will grow into being a female. Therefore, gay men are people who's brains did not completely form into the male structure, and gay women are women who, in the gestational period, began to form a male brain, but did not complete the process, or just regular women seeking attention. Thusly, homosexuality can be explained as a form of brain damage.




Now that we have reached the root of the problem, it is my belief that we, as a people, should begin the process of monitoring the gestation of babies so that we may try to figure out how to cure our species of this horrible defect, before more lives are ruined by it.

 

that is a brillant statement there...amen!

the sooner we rid the world of narrow minded, self rightous assholes filled with hate ...the better this planet will be.

 

Well.. What Sad Little Streak Of Misery And Hate You Are!!!!.....I See From Your Profile You Omitted To List Your Location ????....Well let Me Hazzard A Guess !!!!....You Live In A Little Town Called "Bible Belt".....Every Day I Take The Time To Thank God We Don't Have Any Of "Your Type" Here In Australia............Cheers Glen.

 

Jesus. How can you deny any of this? It's science!

Not only does this guy regard gay men as being brain damaged, he also implies women have underdeveloped brains. Nice.

Oh and if you don't mind me asking, what do you think of lesbians, Mr Darwins_Reason?

This whole social Darwinist shit is so 1920's man. You're living in the past.

 

Haha Whoever put this in the Pure Bull section - good work

 

I am from Sydney, and I am an atheist, but that is beside the point. You all seem to be jumping to classify me as a bigot, when in fact you simply don't understand the facts. I am not saying women are undeveloped, I am telling you that what I stated is exactly how the male brain forms and how the female brain forms. It is fact that all fetuses begin as women, and then develop into men, if you can't accept that without attack the person who told you this then you are obviously unwilling to acknowledge accepted science, much like those who do not believe in evolution. What I have stated is not social Darwinism, it is basic fact. Evolutionarily, it is not advantageous for the males or females to be gay, because the species would die out. To avoid any of the complications of such an occurrence, simple procedures can be taken to assume that the brains of any child forms properly, and to fix any genes that might cause the fetus to produce the wrong hormones. There is no need to deal with the current gay community, they can live out their lives as they so choose, and soon we will be a species free of any anti-evolution attributes, or at least one of the ones that could, theoretically, affect the prorogation of our species.

 

well I had to do something you liked in the end Andy!
S

 

youre working off the assumption that ones gender preference is linked to our genes, that theres something obvious there and not some other cause

when you can scientifically link homosexuality, heterosexuality and bisexuality to our genetic make up, come back with this argument. til hten, shush child, shush.

 

Homosexuality and heterosexuality can both be linked to the amount of estrogen/testosterone you have in your body, as can they be linked to the similarity of your brain structure to either a man or woman. Just because you don't want to accept it doesn't mean it hasn't been stated.

 

Hell bub, you don't get it. Darwins idea's are way deeper than your ability to see. Evolution has the ability to see that reproduction is highly counter-productive for Earth right now. The system sees the wisdom of having bright people willng to nurture others, nurture the Earth with out adding even more strain to the eco-system. Hence it well may be that those of us gifted by evolution to be caretakers will eventually dominate you unnecessary breeders so there is a healthier balance in the world. Don't worry, we have the sense to value you, we won't let you die out. Maybe when you're further evolved you'll see how much we really need each other. Till then, we still love you.

 

Maybe if didn't smoke so much hash you would realize who ridiculous what you just said is. "Evolution has the ability to see that reproduction is highly counter-productive for Earth right now." is a ridiculous statement. Evolution is not a living thing so it doesn't "see" anything, stop anthropomorphizing. Secondly, evolution has absolutely nothing to do with what is good for the "earth". Those species that can ensure their survival and reproduce propagate their genetics and those that don't do remove their genes from the gene pool, that is it. There is no new age philosophy about "what is good for the earth" involved in Darwinism.

 

show me some scientific literature that is, you know, published in a credible journal

 

On what? That rambling new age babble from before? I am afraid I won't be able to find any.

 

wheres your proof of this? credible sources n all that jazz

 

Absolute BOLLOCKS!

Sorry all, just had to get that off of my chest.

 

everything you just wrote about, particularily about homosexuality and heterosexuality relating to the amount of testosterone/estrogen levels in the male/female body. lets see some credible science backing up what you just wrote, otherwise you're just making shit up.

 

http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/199706/homosexuality-biology/3

 

None of this matters.

What do you think will happen in 100, 200...500 years when a 50 yr old business man can go into a doctors office and for the same time and price of a dental check up can come out looking like a hot 20 yr old guy or girl, then switch back monday morning?

What happens in a thousand years, when you can buy an appliance and do it at home?

 

I think I might be a little gay. I have this thing for Lou Reed, you see...

Will getting testosterone shots make me less obsessed with hot rock n' roll Lou Reed sex?

 

Oh how sad I hope this is a joke
Either way, what a poor loser

I also like how this is in Pure Bull where it belongs. Good work