In your opinion, is free love morally wrong? Yes or no

i'm poor i can only pay you in love & hugs & kisses,
maybe we can work out a deal?

 

who mentioned anything about money?
and i thought you were gonna be the one charing.. lol

 

ohh right i forgot im the professional hugger yea pay me!!!!!!!
dont worry though when we're all 3 together in a couple weeks i'll be more then satisfied with the "payment"

 

lol

 

I don't know but ya wanna split it?

 

In my opinion, responsible non-monogamy is not wrong. Lying, cheating, and being deceitfull is wrong.

 

19FlowerGirl87, this is just another case of people taking license with their liberty. We are human beings and can govern ourselves to keep society from running amok. Just because you can screw lots of people doesn't mean you should. Hippies...

 

^ Just because you can be a smartass dosn't mean u should either!!!!

Keep ur nose out of other ppl's opinions!

*sigh* know-It-Alls!

 

i believe if u truely love someone there will be no reason for you to adventure out and "love" everyone! and think about it how real is this love if your just giving it away like balloons on free balloon day?

 

I think it has a lot to do with the description under the title of the forum.

 

You can say that again.I have to agree with you 100%.

 

How can love be free? That seems like a contraction in terms.

 

Again u ppl are misconstruing love and sex. I am truly n love with everyone and every thing, if I saw you in the cold i would hug you, give you shirt off my back and call a cab. if you need something whats mine is yours, you need comfforting i'm here for you, love is about caring for others overtop of your own selfish needs. and in the end thats the way it SHOULD be, but most of you on here are referring to it as "if your sexing somebody then give it to everyone else how is it truly real" when sex is just that...sex. It is a part of love but such a small part. I believe in free love, every other species on this green earth has it, our so-called "society" frowns upon and preconditions your minds to believe it is wrong when really, it's not. it's a beautiful thing to be embraced and cherished... And soaring eagle you have very kind and touching words

**Hugs for You**

 

Sex is one of the many Icebreakers.

 

I do not think it is morally wrong. I think it is all a matter of opinion. With me and my girl, we belive that sex can be shared, and are very open. We talk about having 3 somes 4 somes orgys, you name it, the thing is that I wouldnt really have sex with someone without my girl there, because it wouldnt feel right. They would have to be a part of our Circle of Love, as we call it.

 

I think of it this way: free love is the uninhibited expression of love and by "love" (since there are so many different uses of the word,) I mean really caring for someone beyond just physical attraction. It's possible to care for someone without wanting to have sex with them, and it's also possible to want to have sex with someone without caring for them as is demonstrated by people who force it on people who don't want it (rape,molestation) or who knowingly spread STDs.
If you are expressing caring for others without inhibition, you are not raping them, molesting them or giving them a disease because that is not caring for them, but you are feeling free to have safe, consensual sex (if physical attraction is there) without feeling like you are morally wrong or going to hell or some crap like that. But it's also more than that since sex is only one of countless ways to express love without inhibition.
People usually associate free love with unbridled sex, but free love can be giving food to someone who's hungry or a hug to someone who's lonely --even if you don't know them. Then too, I think it's also allowing others to express love freely without being possessive or thinking of them as having "cheated" on you. A lot of people want a monogamous relationship, and I don't think that is wrong either, but I do feel that putting limits on the expression of love is not quite as good as free love--but that's just my opinion.

 

Love and sex are two different things. Love can include sex but doesn’t have to. Sex can be loving but isn’t always. Love is never morally wrong but sex can be morally wrong. We should feel morally obligated to show Love to all but we are never obligated to have sex with any one.

When the Hippies of the 60’s talked about Free love they were talking about feeling free to show love to others in a world that seemed to be based on hate and a distrust of others.

When they talked of Free Sex they were talking about two people that loved each other feeling free to have sex without needing to worry about getting the approval of a world that didn’t know what love was in the first place.

 

As additional thought;

Sex without love is just a pleasurable experience.
But sex with love is the joining of two souls!

 

i think we are trying too hard to understand what free love really means. freedom to
fuck any body, anyone can do that. love goes much deeper because it means there's
careing for the other person as well as yourself. free to be me and free to be thee
without worry or inhibition. simple words but a world of meaning and understanding.
oh well just a thought.