Get Rid Of Bush!!!

AHHH READ WHO I QUOTED, NOT HARD TO FIGURE OUT WHAT I WAS SAYING. YOU JUST DID THE SAME THING GEEEZUS

 

I say bush must go!!! His answer to everything is blow everything up!! Now that's not the way to do things!!! I think he has many serious phsycalogical issues and he needs to be locked up for good in the rubber hotel!! He is not really christian, a real christian would not be sending such orders as he does, what a hypocrite!!

 

Keep it coming! I love this particular brand of BS. You can't say hippy without ignorant!

 

Or maybe terrorists are going to attack the US if given an opportunity (Do not allow history to guide you; it's full of crap). Whats sad is that the media doesn't focus on the foiled attempts. Just recenctly I caught a 1am special that was supposedly about 9/11 commision findings (yeah right). In this documentary they named several attempts that could have succeeded if law enforcement had not interviened.

Can you name one redeeming quality found in a Muslim extremist bent on killing civilians?

I don't know if you watched the RNC, they made a clear distiction between Muslims/Islam and terrorists. Maybe you've labeled all Muslims, but I haven't.

So, Kerry isn't using terrorism as part of his platform? He isn't saying that Bush is failing us (thus we're going to die), and he would surely be the savior if he were just elected?

 

No More Years!

 

You'll get four more years to say that all you want. Isn't that great?

 

4 more years, huh?

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/3/7/213753/1954

I know you're going to say its not a good source, but if you check these things out, they're all true. But hey, if he's pointing you in the direction you wana be in, by all means, vote for Bush. And if you think that Bush's RECORD deficit of $422 billion is the best thing for this country, then Bush is your man. Those arnt my numbers, and that's not my record. That's your own American CBO's numbers.

And I don't recall anyone saying anything about "all muslims must die". There is a very big distinction. That's like saying all biker guys are killers. No.

 

Damn. I don't usually say this, but I just hate you. You remind me of a republican I know.. you attack every possible aspect of someone's OPINION, and then expect that same person to take YOUR views as FACT. Well fuck that, and fuck you. You leave a bad taste in my mouth.

 

Quite frankly, it is counterproductive to engage in this level of discourse. You are attempting to defend a policy that a) turned this country into an aggressor nation in a way that we have not seen in our history, b) planned to take us into Iraq even before 9/11 (Sept. 11 was simply the catalyst for taking us there; see Paul Wolfowitz's position papers in the mid-90's to read his recommendations to topple Hussein), c) has created more of the atmosphere that breeds resentment and hatred and desire to injure our country, and d) has led this country into a war that has degenerated into Israeli/Palestinian-style conflict with the insurgency controlling large portions of cities while we attack from a distance with ordinance certain to cause significant collateral damage (i.e. dead civilians and ruined infrastructure). Please note that many of the players in this administration were the ones who brought you Iran-Contra in the 80's and ones who subscribe to the notion of the Domino Theory (that the fall of the government in S. Vietnam would lead to the spread of Communism) that was prevalent in the 60's. The theory is applied in Iraq by suggesting if we install a U.S.-style democracy, it will spread to the rest of the region.

In simpler terms, we have been mislead and misrepresented by an administration that wants us to believe that we can dismiss the positions of the rest of the world (including our allies) and hold our standing in the world on military strength alone.

 

BRING ON THE EMOTION HIPPY!!!

 

It's nice to see that your responses are becoming more sophisticated. Any response to the assertions I have made to you?

 

Just in case we needed more reason to dump Bush:


Bush is Making us Safer?

The complete lack of interest of the Bush administration in actually securing dangerous materials connected to the old, abandoned Iraqi nuclear program has long belied Bush's stated concern with Iraq's alleged weapons as a pretext for the war.

James Glanz, William J. Broad and David E. Sanger with Khalid al-Ansary reveal in the New York Times today that the Bush administration allowed 380 tons of super-powerful explosives to disappear from al-Qaqaa, one of Iraq's sensitive military installations, after the war in spring of 2003. These are not ordinary bombs. This explosive material, HMX and RDX, can be used to detonate atomic bombs, collapse buildings, and form warheads for missiles. A pound of it brought down a passenger jet over Lockerbie, Scotland.

A lot of the roadside bombs that have killed hundreds of US troops and maimed thousands have been made of HMX and RDX, as suggested by how infrequently the guerrillas have blown themselves up in planting them. HMX and RDX are favored by terrorists because they are stable and will only explode via a blasting cap.

Incredibly, the International Atomic Energy Commission and European Union officials warned Bush before the war that these explosives needed to be safeguarded.

Josh Marshall is suspicious that this major screw-up has been known to the Bush administration for some time, and that it may have pressured the Iraqi government not to mention it.

If Bush cannot even protect our troops from explosives at a sensitive facility in a country he had conquered, how is he going to protect the American public from terrorists who have not even yet been identified?


Just a thought...